WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The interim superintendent of the Mount Greylock Regional Schools will recommend Wednesday that the school be delayed until Sept. 16 and the year begin in a hybrid learning model that sees half the students in school at any one time.
Robert Putnam on Tuesday delivered two virtual "fireside chats" for members of the school community to discuss the current state of planning for the resumption of classes after in-person instruction ended in March due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Citing a Monday memo from the commissioner of education, Putnam said that the commonwealth is reducing the school year by 10 days for 2020-21.
"The full memorandum of understanding with the [Department of Elementary and Secondary Education], the Massachusetts Teachers' Association, AFT-Massachusetts and the Boston Teachers’ Union …. States that DESE and the unions have a shared commitment to the safety and well-being of students, families and staff," Commissioner Jeffrey Riley’s Monday letter reads in part. "[T]hey are collaborating to support a successful start to the school year, and they recognize the need to provide additional time for educators and staff to prepare for the start of instruction."
The commonwealth is requiring schools to begin providing instruction to students no later than Sept. 16, and that is the date Putnam said he intends to recommend to the School Committee, which sets the school calendar. The original first day of school was to be Sept. 1.
As for the instructional model, Putnam explained that the commonwealth still is requiring all schools to come up with a plan for three different approaches to the start of school: fully in person, fully remote and a hybrid.
His preference is to start the year with a hybrid model.
"While the Mount Greylock Regional School District schools can accommodate all the students for in-person learning, the district administration believes the district must start the school year with a hybrid model to give students, staff and families the time and training to consistently execute behavioral protocols necessary for safe, in-person learning in these times of pandemic," Putnam said during an hour-long noon webinar that he planned to repeat at 7:30 Tuesday evening.
"Students [would] alternate between in-person learning, with safety requirements, and remote learning," he said. "High-needs students may still participate in full-time, in-person instruction.
"The hybrid model requires schools to divide a student body into two groups and then alternate bringing those groups into the school."
Putnam gave two examples of hybrid learning models.
In one, half the students would attend schools on Mondays, Tuesdays and alternate Wednesdays. The other half would attend on the other Wednesdays plus Thursday and Friday each week. On days when a student was not at the school building, he or she would receive instruction remotely.
In the other, half the students could come to the building in the morning and receive remote instruction in the afternoon. After noon, the two cohorts would swap places each day.
Putnam said there are pluses and minuses to each hybrid model, and he is waiting for recommendations from the district’s reopening groups before making a decision on which model to plan for the district’s students.
Whatever plan the school uses, the development of strong remote learning practices will be the key for the coming school year, Putnam said.
"The hybrid model will only be as good as the remote portion of the model," he said.
Plus, he noted, the district could find itself moving from in-person instruction to a fully remote model if the public health conditions demand it. And the guidance from DESE requires that schools make available remote instruction for the children in any family that does not feel comfortable sending kids to school despite the cleaning and social-distancing protocols in place.
On Tuesday, he went over the results of a family survey the district conducted.
With at least 84 percent of the families responding from each of the district’s three schools, the survey found that the majority (58 percent at Mount Greylock, 61 percent at Lanesborough Elementary and 63 percent at Williamstown elementary) "probably" send their children to school with safety protocols in place.
About the same number at each school said they "maybe" would do so — 36 percent at the middle-high school, 31 percent at LES and 30 percent at WES. Ten percent or fewer at each school said they definitely would not, with the highest number in that category, 10 percent, at Mount Greylock.
After presenting his current plan to the School Committee on Wednesday evening, Putnam will make an initial report to the commonwealth on Friday, he said. The final plan is due to DESE on Aug. 10, and he anticipated a School Committee meeting to look at that plan four days earlier.
In the meantime, he referred any members of the school community to the district’s website, which has a new page devoted to COVID-19 updates, including the reports from the district’s planning working groups as they become available.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
One of the issues no one considers or talks about is day care. Kids through 8th grade or so need home supervision. Parents need to work in many cases. Will the district make an effort to put elementary school and high school students in the same family on the same schedule?
Mount Greylock School Committee Votes Down Remote Learning Start to School Year
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires.com Sports
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Two months of input and advice from Mount Greylock’s working groups looking at the reopening of school were undone in four hours of discussion by the School Committee on Thursday night.
On a 6-1 vote, the committee directed interim superintendent Robert Putnam to submit to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education a radically different plan for the start of the year that moves more children into the school building more quickly than the administration was recommending.
Subject to approval by DESE and, not insignificantly, collective bargaining with the district’s unions, there will be no two-week period of fully remote learning as Putnam was proposing.
Putnam went into Thursday’s meeting with plans based on input from groups established in the spring and summer by him and his predecessor with the goal of getting the School Committee's blessing for the plan he has to submit to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education on Friday.
Putnam laid out a plan largely like the one he presented in a virtual town hall on Tuesday evening and told the School Committee he was looking for guidance.
In a split decision on Tuesday, the Planning Board voted to recommend town meeting take no action on either of the proposed zoning bylaw amendments related to the production of marijuana. click for more
On a 6-1 vote, the Mount Greylock School Committee Thursday directed Putnam to submit to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education a radically different plan for the start of the year that moves more children into the school building more quickly than the administration was recommending. click for more
Putnam said that, depending in part on the levels of COVID-19 infection in the area, the district will, at some point, offer families the option of keeping their child or children home for remote learning or sending the children to school for part of the week in a hybrid model.
click for more