WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Less than a year after its board of directors held its first meeting, the sprawling Mohawk Trail Woodlands Partnership is on track to hire an administrative agent.
The board's search committee met on Monday afternoon and recommended to the full board that it enter negotiations with the New England Forestry Foundation to provide administrative support.
The Littleton-based NEFF was the lone respondent to the MTWP's request for proposals. Monday, the subcommittee reviewed the non-profit's answers to the panel's followup questions before voting, 5-0, to send a recommendation to Tuesday's board meeting.
"I think they've addressed, although not in terribly great detail, our concerns," said Williamstown's Hank Art, the chair of the MTWP board. "Overall, it was a decent response, especially since we gave them all of two days to come up with the answers to 13 questions.
"On balance, I'm happy with the fact they've addressed our concerns. It strengthens the proposal from where it was last week."
The Mohawk Trail Woodlands Partnership includes North Adams and 20 towns in Berkshire and Franklin Counties.
Its mission is to bring financial and technical resources to those municipalities in order to support natural resources-based economic development and sustainable forestry in the region, which stretches from Peru north to the Vermont state line and from Williamstown east to Leyden.
To that end, the partnership has helped secure nearly a half million in state funding for local projects over the last year, with $260,000 awarded in February and $225,000 earlier this fall.
From its inception, the MTWP board has envisioned hiring an administrator, a process that it had hoped to wrap up this summer — before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Monday's meeting marked a step in that direction. One taken after subcommittee members expressed a couple of concerns about the NEFF proposal.
Franklin Regional Council of Governments Director of Planning and Development Peggy Sloan suggested that the MTWP needs more specificity from the New England Forestry Foundation about how it plans to allocate resources to supporting the partnership.
"What would be helpful is if the budget was broken down by task so you could see how much staff time is allocated to developing the plan, how much to supporting the subcommittees," she said.
Art said that is among the issues that could be worked out in negotiating the final contract.
"In the contract, we could say the subcommittees are an integral part of the board, and that would cover that we need support for the work of the subcommittees," he said. "We should nail that down in the contract."
Whit Sanford of the Greater Shelburne Falls Area Business Association said she liked NEFF's proposal overall but wondered about its commitment to economic development.
"They seem reticent about developing the whole plan within the budget framework," Sanford said. "That seems to me a problem because that's the first thing we want done.
"Also, while they've easily identified all the conservation groups, they didn't identify the economic development groups … They could work with the CDCs or Chambers of Commerce … and business associations."
Robert O'Connor of the commonwealth's Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs said he appreciated Sanford's concern but felt the MTWP would not be able to find one agency that would satisfy all its needs.
"They said they'd subcontract out with approval of the board," O'Connor said. "I think that when we actually do a contract, that's our next chance to tweak the proposal into a scope."
Adams' Joe Nowak agreed that the partnership should move forward with the New England Forestry Foundation.
"I don't want to stay in neutral," Nowak said. "I'd rather get on the accelerator and start moving forward. I feel they're a pretty good group. I get what Whit [Sanford] says, but I feel that's something that can be tweaked before the contract is signed.
"I feel comfortable with that group. I liked what they have to say."
The full Mohawk Trail Woodlands Partnership board is scheduled to meet Tuesday at 6 p.m.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Williams College Lone Proponent for Development of Water Street Lot
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Williams College hopes to replace the current Facilities Services building on Latham Street and use that space for a new athletics complex.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — If the town accepts an offer from Williams College, a 1.27-acre lot that long has been eyed as a possible venue for housing and economic development instead will find a use similar to its history.
The college was the lone respondent to the town's request for proposals to purchase and develop 59 Water St., a dirt lot known around town as the "old town garage site." This was first reported Wednesday by Greylock News.
If successful, the college plans to use the former town garage property for the school's Facilities Services building. Or it could be turned back into a parking lot.
Williams' offer includes a $500,000 upfront payment and a 10-year agreement to make $50,000 annual donations to the Mount Greylock Regional School District according to the proposal unsealed on Wednesday afternoon.
If it closes the deal, the college said it will explore development of a three- to four-story Facilities Services building with "a structured parking facility providing approximately 170 spaces."
"[I]f site constraints impact our ability to develop both structured parking and the Facilities Services building, our backup proposal is to develop the parking structure with approximately 170 spaces, also with capacity to support institutional and public needs," the college's proposal reads.
The college's current Facilities property at 60 Latham St. has an assessed value — for the .42-acre lot only — of $113,000 and an annual property tax bill of $1,606, according to the town's website.
Bergeron answered that officials in both member towns told the district they did not want Mount Greylock using taxpayers' money to build their reserves. click for more
Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 84 North Summer St.
click for more
The tax bill of a median-priced single family home will go up by 8.45 percent in the year that begins July 1 under a spending plan approved by the Finance Committee on Wednesday night.
click for more