Letter: Henny Penny in Williamstown Over Marijuana Cultivation

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Let's continue to allow outdoor marijuana cultivation in Williamstown. Vote no on a planned amendment that would ban outdoor growing. And vote yes on article 29 at the June 8 town meeting. The proposed zoning bylaw would continue to allow — but further restrict — legal cultivation. If we want to know what the impacts might be we can look back over the last four years. There has been one proposed outdoor grow operation that faced stiff opposition and legal challenges and went elsewhere. Up to two acres of cultivation has been legal in Williamstown since 2017.

I am not arguing whether marijuana is good or bad, but we're seeing a strange hypocrisy from those trying to outlaw legal cultivation. Some of the opponents are the same people who have cried out for years that regulation of land use was crippling economic development. But now they want to prevent Williamstown's current or future farmers from growing a crop that is legally available to them.

Growing up in Williamstown in the '60s and '70s I can say with authority that, like it or not, marijuana has been a major part of life here for at least half a century. It's been widely used to varying degrees by students, parents, teachers, professors, doctors, lawyers and others. Up until 2017 this widespread use was criminal. We indirectly enabled illegal trafficking and the attendant violence and devastation in Latin America and inner cities. But because we are a largely white and increasingly privileged community, we rarely suffered the consequences of decades of criminality.

In 2017 residents overwhelmingly supported legalizing recreational use of marijuana and cultivation. Now Williamstown receives close to half-a-million in tax revenue from fees from legal sales. Massachusetts dispensaries may sell only marijuana grown in Massachusetts. But suddenly the sky is falling because the Planning Board is trying to establish sensible safeguards for grow operations that may or may not be proposed in the future.

While we reap the fiscal benefits from the legal sale of recreational pot, it's only fair to allow farmers and landowners to benefit from a completely organic and legal crop. Let's not push possible impacts off on a less privileged community. Please vote no on the planned amendment that would ban outdoor cultivation. And please vote yes on Article 29, which would place sensible restrictions on an already legal farming opportunity.

Dave Simonds
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planners OK Preliminary Habitat Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board on Tuesday agreed in principle to most of the waivers sought by Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to build five homes on a Summer Street parcel.
 
But the planners strongly encouraged the non-profit to continue discussions with neighbors to the would-be subdivision to resolve those residents' concerns about the plan.
 
The developer and the landowner, the town's Affordable Housing Trust, were before the board for the second time seeking an OK for the preliminary subdivision plan. The goal of the preliminary approval process is to allow developers to have a dialogue with the board and stakeholders to identify issues that may come up if and when NBHFH brings a formal subdivision proposal back to the Planning Board.
 
Habitat has identified 11 potential waivers from the town's subdivision bylaw that it would need to build five single-family homes and a short access road from Summer Street to the new quarter-acre lots on the 1.75-acre lot the trust purchased in 2015.
 
Most of the waivers were received positively by the planners in a series of non-binding votes.
 
One, a request for relief from the requirement for granite or concrete monuments at street intersections, was rejected outright on the advice of the town's public works directors.
 
Another, a request to use open drainage to manage stormwater, received what amounted to a conditional approval by the board. The planners noted DPW Director Craig Clough's comment that while open drainage, per se, is not an issue for his department, he advised that said rain gardens not be included in the right of way, which would transfer ownership and maintenance of said gardens to the town.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories