image description
The Police Advisory Board is considering to better meet its mission, including how to do community outreach.

Police Advisory Board Looks to Amend Ordinance to Support its Mission

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Police Advisory and Review Board is considering amending its governing ordinance to improve how it functions.

Three members have agreed to hold a "sub meeting" to begin this discussion: Judge Alfred Barbalunga, Erin Sullivan, and Michael Feldberg.

For some time now, the board has mulled the possibility of amending its ordinance for clarification and empowerment.

In July, members were advised to think about its language to make changes that support its mission.  The panel intended to meet in September but the meeting was canceled.

Between the two meetings, Chairwoman Ellen Maxon met with Mayor Linda Tyer and City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta so they could review and make suggestions on the PARB ordinance.

The current duties and powers of the board include studying policies, practices, and procedures to provide a forum for the public to discuss them, receiving complaints from the public and relaying them to the chief of police, and reviewing final investigative reports regarding citizens' complaints to make policy recommendations.
 
The review board feels a degree of frustration with the legal constraints that prohibit it from more direct involvement in the oversight of the Police Department. There was a debate at the time the board was modified to its current form to give it a more robust role in investigating and reviewing police operations.

Pagnotta's recommendation applies to PARB's first listed duty in the ordinance, which reads: "To study police-related policies, practices, and procedures and to provide a forum in which citizens may address police matters."

He found it appropriate to add "Where appropriate, the board may advise on purpose and or recommend positions, procedures, regulation, rules, statements, and policies of the Pittsfield Police Department," to the end of the sentence.

The board did not vote on the amendment at this meeting because of the sub-meeting that is planned.  There is not a date set for it but Maxon said it will occur before PARB's next regularly scheduled meeting so it can be on the agenda.



The board also received correspondence from state Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier in regard to her proposal for the state's $3.65 billion spending bill that allocates $250,000 for the Pittsfield police station design, engineering, and construction.

Because of the facility's current conditions, PARB has previously taken a stance in supporting the new police headquarters project with a price tag of $55 million. They will be sending a letter to Farley-Bouvier in support of her position.

In addition, Maxon discussed how the pandemic has affected PARB's ability to reach out to the community over the last 19 months.

"We have been meeting for 31 months and 19 of those months we've been under this COVID situation, which in my mind has been very unfortunate because we haven't been able to meet in person and talk to each other and connect, but it's also I think has affected our ability to reach out to the community, which is one of our charges and I feel badly about that," she said to the panel.

"Because for the first year when we met we had so much training and just procedural stuff to get out of the way that we never quite got to the providing a forum for the public to talk to us, and that makes me sad and I'm hoping that there's a way if we continue to do Zoom meetings if anyone has ideas on ways that we can reach out to the community that would be helpful."

Members suggested hosting hybrid meetings to allow for in-person and virtual commerce.

Sullivan pointed out that virtual meetings over the Zoom platform improve accessibility for those who cannot get to the City Hall for meetings.

The board is scheduled to meet again on Nov. 16, when the conversation on ordinance changes and community outreach will resume.


Tags: police advisory,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories