image description

State Considering Limit on Bus, RV Access to Mount Greylock

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Advisory Council discussed the impact on the state reservation of a proposed regulation that would limit longer vehicles on the mountain's roads.
 
Chairman Cosmo Catalano Jr. said during Thursday's brief virtual meeting that the state is considering a limit on vehicles longer than 21 feet. 
 
Mark Jester, mountain district manager for the state Department of Conservation said he wanted to be clear that DCR is still researching the prospect and although something may go through, there is still a lot of work to do on a new regulation.
 
"It is still in the planning process and this isn't just Mount Greylock, it is with our other high-ground locations," he said. "We are looking at this across the state. It wasn't just Greylock included in the MassDOT survey."
 
Cheshire representative Gary Trudeau is opposed to the regulation because he felt it would limit access to the summit.
 
"I am more interested in getting people up the mountain and giving them access," he said.
 
Specifically, he was concerned about service vehicles that needed to climb the mountain for deliveries and maintenance. Also, larger passenger vehicles often bring students and groups of people to the state's highest summit.  
 
Trudeau added that his own truck is 21.4 feet and by the proposed rules he would not be allowed to drive up the mountain's roads.
 
He also didn't think the regulation would be easy to enforce.
 
Jester again clarified that much of this still has to be worked out but did note there would be an exception for larger service vehicles that need to access the summit.
 
He added that most trucks fit in that 21-foot range, and there wouldn't be a problem if they were a bit over.
 
"On average trucks are OK even if they are closer or a little over they can use the roads," he said. "Your truck, my truck, DCR trucks, those are fine." 
 
He said the regulation is really aimed at buses and recreational vehicles that not only cause extra wear and tear on the road, but could create dangerous situations on the switchbacks. He added that it is difficult to park these larger vehicles at the summit and that they often cause traffic flow problems.
 
He did agree that driving students and groups of people up the mountain would be difficult without buses or larger vans. He said this is an issue that still needs to be worked out.
 
Adams representative Heather Lindscott thought some sort of regulation was a good idea and was happy it was being considered by the state.
 
"I think it is a good idea. I think school buses and RVs going up there is scary," she said. "There has to be some sort of limit. The road is not built for that."
 
Jester said there are no plans to put a new regulation in place in the immediate future.
 
"It is not out of the realm of going through, and it is a matter of working out the details about the length and what types of vehicles it addresses," Jester said. "I am not saying it will happen tomorrow but maybe before the end of the year."
 
Other than that there wasn't much to discuss and Park Supervisor Travis Clairmont gave a brief report.
 
"It has been pretty light," he said. "I don't think I have ever had a report where I didn't have an incident to report." 
 
He went over some winter maintenance and said the administrative garage underwent some paving and drainage work.
 
"In the past, it was pretty much an ice factory," he said.
 
He said the furnace in the building has failed, and that they are working toward a repair.
 
He said composting toilets have been removed form the summit, and there are plans to install new ones. 
 
To improve communication with the snowmobiling community and minimize complaints, Clairmont said they are beta testing a new Groomer Tracker App that will upload directly to sledmass.com's interactive map. 
 
This allows users to see when and which trails were recently groomed in real-time.
 
In lighter news, Clairmont said he has made a new friend on the mountain.
 
"We have had a ruffed grouse hanging out near the visitors center through November and December," he said. "It has been following me around for like 30 days. I can't do any work on the mountain without it showing up … I named it Sheila."
 
Clairmont said the ruffed grouse is perfectly comfortable sitting on the hood of vehicles or getting inside them when she can. 
 
He said she even makes an appearance on group hikes.
 
"I tell everyone on the hikes that we will have an encounter, and they look at me like I am crazy like I have a pet bird in the woods," he said. "On every occasion when we go on a hike the bird would come out of the woods and walk up to me and follow us for the rest of the hike."
 
He said ruffed grouse are usually pretty territorial, especially when they are nesting and it is odd to meet one so friendly.
 
Clairmont said he hasn't seen her in a few weeks but hoped for another visit soon.
 
"Hopefully she is alright, and I will see her again," he said. "It was nice during the fall and early winter."

Tags: Mount Greylock,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Fire Deliberates Next Steps on Retirement Mandate

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

ADAMS, Mass. — The Fire Department is seeking clarifications on how the state's mandatory retirement age for firefighters will affect its older members who aren't involved in firefighting. 

Earlier this month, the Fire District questioned the impact of the retirement mandate after four Dalton firefighters, including the interim chief, had to retire.

During a workshop on Monday, board members said they will seek a legal opinion regarding the district's available options. With Chief John Pansecchi set to retire, First Assistant Engineer David Lennon intends to run for the chief position, while Edward Capeless plans to run for Lennon's current role.

Pansecchi went over some of the department's policies, stating that members 65 and older are just support members and are exterior only (as opposed to entering a building).

The board is looking to also clarify its insurance related to what ages it covered. 

"We have documentation that in 2021 our insurance company said that we were covered for everything, but after 70 we weren't covered for heart circulation. We're trying to verify the current age," Pansecchi said, stating the company may have changed its policies.

He also would like to know if the district creates a separate support person, what would be needed to make sure they cover their insurance bases.

Lennon brought examples from other communities which have had to deal with the mandatory retirements and how they used home rule petitions through the Legislature to keep older firefighters on. Some had done it by department and some by individuals, and got district meeting votes before applying. 

They plan to ask state Rep. John Barrett III to guide them on a home-rule petition as well as look at sample language from others who have applied.

Lennon suggested having fire company members who are 65 and older not wear fire gear at a scene,  but rather a coat or vest that will show they are affiliated with the department.

"What we would like to do, to keep the Prudential Committee comfortable with what's going on, because we do want to have safety for all of our firefighters," he said. "The safety of my guys that are inside are directly affected by the person I have outside. So he's making judgement calls, and he's getting resources that we need, and there needs to be somebody to do that.

"And when take some of those people away that can do that, but can't be interior, we remove more interior people, which is not advantageous."

He said Capeless is a valuable asset as he usually is outside of the fire.

"We just had a structure fire, and the way that worked was, we got to work. We took over command, stayed outside. He did the radio work. He got resources while the people were inside. Now, if we take that out of that picture, that means one of the people working [inside] has to now go outside, and so that's where we come down to," Lennon said.

The team is also working with legal counsel to find out if support members should be driving the vehicles and what other liability exposures there might be.

Pansecchi said the department is comprised of a core of 15 members and will lose one once he leaves next month, and the loss of another five affected by the mandate will have a deleterious impact.

"Thirty-three on the roster. If you remove these five individuals, bring us down to 28 out of those, one's on regular military leave, two apprentices have not been showing up and may be removed in their future, one of the engineers has not responded to a call in months," he said. "That brings us down to 23 then we have about eight members, not including the above members, that have made less than 10 percent of the calls." 

Board members agreed to start the uniform differential with the older members and said  they will consider next once they have more information.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories