Fire Chief Craig Pedercini provides information on articles at the Fire District's annual meeting. Right, Markus Burns, a member of the district's Community Advisory Committee, gives an update.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — After decades of service to the town's fire district and decades more to the protection of lives and property, Ed Briggs said an emotional goodbye at Tuesday's annual district meeting.
"I've enjoyed every bit of it," said Briggs, who decided not to run for a 14th consecutive three-year term on the district's Prudential Committee. "I've spent most of my life involved in fire departments, so that will be a change.
"I appreciate the voters electing me for 13 terms. I don't know if that's good or bad. But it's gone in a flash."
Briggs will not truly be gone from Williamstown's fire service, and his service will involve a flash.
Prudential Committee Chair John Notsley told Tuesday's meeting that he has appointed Briggs the district's official photographer, a title that is more meaningful than one might think.
"It's kind of an important role because when we have a bad situation and call in the fire marshal, they want to see what we saw when we arrived," Briggs said. "I've gotten to know some of the marshals, and when they arrive, I give them the chip out of the camera or – in the old days – got the film developed as fast as I could so they could start their investigation."
In addition to his service behind the lens, Briggs has played an integral role in advancing the district's efforts to build a new fire station, Notsley said.
"We're going to miss Ed's expertise and thoughtfulness," Notsley said. "He's been a fantastic guy. He kept the board rolling along."
Notsley is the sole remaining member from the Prudential Committee in its days as a three-member board; it was expanded to five in 2019. Last year, another longtime public servant, Ed McGowan, stepped down after serving 18 years on the committee and 50 as a firefighter and chief in the town.
Prior to the start of the annual meeting, the district held its election for new committee members to fill Briggs' seat and the one vacated during the year by former Chair Richard Reynolds.
Alex Steele and Joe Beverly, the only candidates on the ballot, were elected with 36 votes and 33 votes, respectively.
Thirty-eight voters participated in the election from 4 to 7 p.m., and 25 residents checked in to the annual meeting in the Williamstown Elementary School gymnasium.
The meeting members needed to take care of one bit of business to bless the results of the election. At the end of the meeting's previously warned agenda items, Notsley sought a vote to allow Steele, a call volunteer firefighter in the district for 18 years, to serve on the Prudential Committee in light of what could be seen as a conflict of interest.
Like the other 11 votes in the meeting, which took a little more than half an hour, the motion passed unanimously.
None of the meeting members spoke from the floor to question the articles crafted by the Prudential Committee over the last couple of months. But Chief Craig Pedercini went to the podium a couple of times to provide additional information on some of the special fiscal articles outside the district's regular operating budget.
Before a vote on a $120,000 appropriation for a new brush truck for the Forest Warden, Pedercini explained the current truck is nearly 30 years old and actually broke down last year during the fight to contain the East Mountain wildfire.
Likewise, Pedercini said his primary vehicle, known as "Car 1," recently broke down during a call. The Prudential Committee sought and received from the meeting approval to spend up to $70,000 on a new command vehicle to replace the 10-year-old rapid response command vehicle.
Tuesday's meeting included reports from the district's Building Committee and Community Advisory Committee, who both received thanks from Notsley for their service to the district.
In turn, the advisory committee's Markus Burns thanked the department's firefighters.
"As a town, we kind of take it for granted that when there's an emergency, the district shows up," Burns said. "We don't necessarily consider everything else that goes into the work done by the district. [The advisory committee has] learned about the limitations of the current space and also the staff and recruitment challenges.
"We've been happy to try to help think of different ways to adapt to the availability of volunteers."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: Vote No on 'Jungle' Primaries
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
They don't call them "jungle primaries" for nothing.
Question 3 on the November ballot would trash two-party primary elections and replace them with California-style, chaotic — and extraordinarily costly — "jungle" primaries that would destroy the very political parties that have kept America stable since Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison created them in the 1790s.
Jungle primaries put all candidates, regardless of party, on one ballot with the top two vote-getters facing off in the general election — even if they're from the same party. That would create chaos, but the real issue is money: Jungle primaries give a distinct advantage to candidates backed by corporate money and the super wealthy. In short, jungle primaries move our primaries from the ballot box to big donor meetings long before campaigning even begins.
When something this radical is proposed, you have to look at who's behind it, who's funding it, and ask "why" they are doing it.
Their philosophical guru is Danielle Allen, a Harvard professor who ran for governor in 2022 but couldn't get 15 percent of the Democratic Convention vote to win the party's endorsement.
The money behind this extreme attack on small "d" democratic politics tells us more. With over $5 million in the bank as of Aug. 28, this is a very well-funded campaign — the lion's share of which came from wealthy Boston-area private equity individuals.
Twenty-two private equity executives gave $3.99 million, or 77 percent of all the money from individuals. Current and former Bain Capital executives contributed $1.92 million, and Berkshire Partners executives put up $1.32 million. In short, 22 rich people put up nearly $4 million to change how five million of us vote. Yes, it seems the ultra-wealthy want to destroy the two-party system that has kept our politics stable for 200 years.
The community-based non-profit organizations that operate local access cable TV channels in the Berkshires have been expanding their roles and strengthening their ties to their communities to adapt to the volatile era of "new media."
click for more
Unlike two weeks ago more people turned out Monday to urge the board to accept the plan to hang the Hometown Hero banners on utility poles around town between Memorial Day and Veterans Day starting in the spring of 2027. click for more
The Cooperative Hoosac Valley football program will resume football related activities on Monday, Sept. 28, after being on “pause” for the past nine days. click for more
The festivities, scheduled for 1 to 5 p.m., will feature a demonstration by a professional skateboarder, food and music to celebrate the long-sought publicly/privately funded facility. click for more