Williamstown Select Board Finds Diversity Training Program for Town Personnel

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday expressed its commitment to provide ongoing diversity, equity and inclusion training for town employees.
 
And the board members promised in a formal statement to participate in that training themselves.
 
Andy Hogeland and Jeff Johnson took the lead on finding a firm to train town personnel in how to treat one another and members of the public in a way that upholds DEI values — as mandated by a pair of articles overwhelmingly passed by town meeting in 2020.
 
"We discovered three or four months ago there was a gap in our DEI training," Hogeland said Monday. "In the course of the last three months, we talked to various people who do this. We have come down to recommending this particular one."
 
The one they chose, Diversity Builder out of Nashville, Tenn., is a 19-year-old workplace training firm whose clients have included, among others, the Williamstown Police Department, which made its own push to establish DEI principles in the wake of revelations in a 2020 lawsuit that roiled town government.
 
"I was pleasantly surprised by the volume [of trainers] out there, which made it a more difficult decision for us," Johnson said. "This is about getting us up to par with modern trainings.
 
"It is not anything against our town employees. But it's our job to get them training."
 
The $1,800 price tag for online training was less than the board expected, Johnson said. And, as a bonus, the expense can be covered by the fiscal 2022 budget that ends on Thursday. That leaves untouched the $7,000 that the town allocated to diversity training in the FY23 budget.
 
Board member Randal Fippinger objected to the idea that the training will be conducted online.
 
"This sort of work needs to be done in person, in groups, preferably in smaller groups," Fippinger said. "It's significantly different than the kind of training you do online."
 
Johnson and Hogeland agreed, but Johnson noted that with in-person training, "zeroes add on to that cost."
 
Both emphasized that the initial online program from Diversity Builder is the beginning of the town's process, a point echoed by incoming Town Manager Bob Menicocci in the statement the board approved 5-0 on Monday night.
 
"As Bob said, this is a start," Johnson said. "You can take that initial training, and it puts something in our files that people can be held accountable to because they've had the training.
 
"This is just a start to get us going."
 
Monday's statement on DEI training dovetailed with another item on the agenda, a review of last week's joint meeting between the Select Board and the Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Committee.
 
Select Board Chair Hugh Daley said it was a productive exercise in crystalizing the purpose of the DIRE Committee as it begins its third year.
 
That purpose was left largely undefined by the Select Board itself when it created the advisory committee in the summer of 2020 after residents expressed concern about equity issues in the town as the country grappled with race relations in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis
 
"If you ask 10 different people in town what the purpose of the DIRE Committee is, you get 10 different answers," Daley said, repeating a comment he made in last week's joint meeting.
 
He said even the DIRE Committee and Select Board members who attended the joint meeting had trouble expressing a succinct mission for the advisory committee. Daley argued that a clearer remit will help DIRE Committee members.
 
"It's not that we're totally far apart, but if it's not something where people can say, 'I know why we're doing this,' you're stuck."
 
Fippinger, who chaired the DIRE Committee before his election to the Select Board in May, pointed out that attendees at last week's meeting agreed that DIRE is empowered to pursue its own projects in addition to answering specific questions posed by the Select Board.
 
Last week's session was the first part of a dialogue about the DIRE Committee's role in town government. On Tuesday, June 28, the Select Board was to hold the first of a series of public listening sessions to receive input from residents about how they saw the diversity panel's purpose.
 
In other business on Monday, the Select Board approved a utility pole move on Berkshire Drive, reappointed some incumbent members of town boards and committees, expressed its appreciation for the service of interim Town Manager Charlie Blanchard, whose term ends Thursday and discussed the town's approach to expenditures of American Rescue Plan Act funds.
 
The board also talked about how things went at this month's annual town meeting, which was both longer than usual and, for some, frustrating for its inability to decide on a number of proposed zoning bylaw amendments.
 
The issues arising out of the June 14 meeting, coupled with longstanding concerns about low attendance at the meeting, have sparked interest in either reforms to the town meeting model, consideration of charter changes that would alter the meeting's role in town government or both.
 
Daley suggested on Monday that the board look at undertaking parallel studies: one to review the charter, which is largely unchanged since 1956; and one to consider reforms to the meeting, including, as some have suggested, moving to Saturday or even breaking the process into two sessions.

Tags: diversity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Votes Slight Increase to Proposed Assessments

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee on Thursday voted unanimously to slightly increase the assessment to the district's member towns from the figures in the draft budget presented by the administration.
 
The School Committee opted to lower the use of Mount Greylock's reserve account by $70,000 and, instead, increase by that amount the share of the fiscal year 2025 operating budget shared proportionally by Lanesborough and Williamstown taxpayers.
 
The budget prepared by the administration and presented to the School Committee at its annual public hearing on Thursday included $665,000 from the district's Excess and Deficiency account, the equivalent of a municipal free cash balance, an accrual of lower-than-anticipated expenses and higher-than-anticipated revenue in any given year.
 
That represented a 90 percent jump from the $350,000 allocated from E&D for fiscal year 2024, which ends on June 30. And, coupled with more robust use of the district's tuition revenue account (7 percent more in FY25) and School Choice revenue (3 percent more), the draw down on E&D is seen as a stopgap measure to mitigate a spike in FY25 expenses and an unsustainable budgeting strategy long term, administrators say.
 
The budget passed by the School Committee on Thursday continues to rely more heavily on reserves than in years past, but to a lesser extent than originally proposed.
 
Specifically, the budget the panel approved includes a total assessment to Williamstown of $13,775,336 (including capital and operating costs) and a total assessment to Lanesborough of $6,425,373.
 
As a percentage increase from the FY24 assessments, that translates to a 3.90 percent increase to Williamstown and a 3.38 percent increase to Lanesborough.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories