Williamstown ZBA Continues Vote on Chemical Dependency Center Again

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals continued an application to operate a chemical dependency rehabilitation facility in the former Sweet Brook Nursing Home on Cold Spring Road for the third — and likely final — time on Thursday.

Last month, the ZBA continued the petition to a third meeting hoping that the applicant, Williamstown Recovery Realty LLC, and abutter Sweetwood retirement community, could reach an understanding about the fencing and landscaping plans.

Williamstown Recovery partner Sean Stewart reported that he and Sweetwood attorney Karla Chaffee had discussed site plan alterations in the interim.  The two agreed on a split rail fence on the property and tree replacement where there is a gap in the tree line.

The issue is that the board did not have a site plan that reflected these alterations in front of them. For this reason, they continued the decision to Sept. 15.  

Within the plan, they would like specifics about the fencing and the trees.

"We've permitted things before the site plan was submitted and then we'll get the site plan and it was not what we thought we had permitted," board member Keith Davis said.

"I'm nervous with passing something and not having the actual site plan in place. I'm in favor of the petition but I would like to see what is proposed."

The board is essentially in agreement with everything but the missing site plan, which Stewart said he could submit by Monday.

"I think if the applicants know that they don't have to come back with high anxiety," Chair Andrew Hoar said.

Chaffee suggested that it may be helpful for the board to provide an example of an acceptable site plan to the applicant so that he has guidance.

It was suggested that a special meeting is held for the decision, as members expressed that they wanted to finally put it to rest, but there was no room in the town calendar.



Owner Williamstown Recovery Realty LLC intends to use the building as an inpatient chemical dependency/co-occurring disorder treatment facility with Williamstown Recovery LLC as the operator.  The facility aims to provide medical supervision, assessment, and clinical services for adult men and women.

It will fall under the same use as the previous nursing home and will not require any change to the current utilities.

The property falls under RR3 for institutional use and its use as an inpatient behavioral health-care facility required a special permit from the ZBA. Only superficial interior improvements are proposed to transform it to the new use.

Stone Hill Road resident Paul Haklisch, who has raised concerns with the proposal and questioned the applicant's qualifications at both preceding hearings, again urged the ZBA to "hit the pause button" on the proposal.

He said that the applicants have never operated a chemical dependency center before and that it is not clear who is responsible.

"We as a committee as participants are doing a gross disservice to the community if we give a license to people who aren't qualified," Haklisch said.

Board members pointed out that there are state qualifications that the applicant has to meet before opening the facility and that it is not under the ZBA's purview to make that decision.  

"We have another month to continue to think about this. We have a month for Mr. Stewart and his organization to prepare the materials we've requested, to get those materials to miss Chaffee, for people, and to [Community Development Director Andrew Groff] to distribute appropriately, in a timely manner so that we have a chance to review them prior to the Sept. 15th meeting," Hoar said.

"If members of the Board want to consider [Haklisch's] concerns we encourage you to investigate that on your own and bring those concerns to our next meeting."


Tags: ZBA,   addiction recovery,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Fin Comm Hears from Police Department, Library

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Police Chief Michael Ziemba last week explained to the Finance Committee why an additional full-time officer needs to be added to the fiscal year 2027 budget.
 
The 13 officers in the Williamstown Police Department are insufficient to maintain the department's minimal threshold of two officers on patrol per shift without employing overtime and relying on the chief and the WPD's one detective to cover patrol shifts if an officer is sick or using personal time, Ziemba explained.
 
Some of that coverage was provided in the past by part-time officers, but that option was taken away by the commonwealth's 2020 police reform act.
 
"We lost two part-timers a couple of years ago," Ziemba told the Fin Comm. "They were part-time officers, but they also worked the desk. So between the desk and the cruiser shifts, they were working 40 hours a week, the two of them. We lost them to police reform.
 
"We have seen that we're struggling to cover shifts voluntarily now. We're starting to order people to cover time-off requests. … We don't have the flexibility when somebody goes out for a surgery or sickness or maternity leave to cover that without overtime. An additional position, I believe, would alleviate that."
 
Ziemba bolstered his case by benchmarking the force against like-sized communities in Berkshire County.
 
Adams, for example, has 19 full-time officers and handled 9,241 calls last year with a population just less than 8,000 and a coverage area of 23 square miles, Ziemba said. By comparison, Williamstown has 13 officers, handled 15,000 calls for service, has a population of about 8,000 (including staff and students at Williams College) and covers 46.9 square miles.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories