image description
State Rep. William 'Smitty' Pignatelli addresses the Western Massachusetts Passenger Rail Commission on Friday, urging that the Berkshires be part of the initial plan from day one.

Local Leaders Advocate for Berkshires Inclusion in East/West Rail Plans

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

State Rep. John Barrett III says the investment will be worth it. Other members of the commission participating remotely are cast on the wall.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Local officials want to ensure that Berkshire County is not left out of initial plans for the east/west passenger rail.
 
The Western Massachusetts Passenger Rail Commission held the first of six planned statewide public hearings at the Berkshire Innovation Center on Friday. Several dozen people attended in person and the meeting was available through Zoom, which a number of people used to provide testimony.
 
The panel heard testimony about how the rail service is crucial to economic development and statewide accessibility for residents. There was also a wealth of support for taking the connection across state lines to Albany, N.Y.
 
State Rep. William "Smitty" Pignatelli said he would like to see the rail connection begin with the Berkshires — working eastward instead of westward.
 
"I have to tell you in my 20 years in the House, I have never once seen the Western Mass 413 delegations work better together than on this particular issue," Pignatelli said.
 
"New legislators, old legislators, we all came together for the greater good so I hope that you would really consider the western link first."
 
The connection would transform Western Mass and especially Berkshire County with immediate economic opportunities, he said, adding that the county cannot wait for rail that starts in the east.
 
"We will see our declining population start to reverse immediately. We will receive the jobs that we have here that are needed to be filled — from hospitality to hospitals and doctors and lawyers and engineers and nurses across the spectrum of our economy," Pignatelli said.
 
"We're becoming an older population in the Berkshires. We're becoming a poorer population in the Berkshires. Making this once-in-a-lifetime, certainly my lifetime, once-in-a-100-year lifetime investment would be transformative to finally connect the commonwealth in its entirety from the Berkshires to Boston."
 
State Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier, participating remotely, seconded the sentiment.
 
"Keep the word 'Pittsfield' in mind constantly. Please do not succumb to the temptation to leave Pittsfield out, for now, to say that we're going to solve getting to the Berkshires later," she said.
 
"Anything short of connecting the Berkshires in the initial plan will send a strong message that this commission and the commonwealth of Massachusetts is leaving the people of Berkshire County behind, leaving us behind yet again."
 
This will work, state Rep. John Barrett III said, but it will take money and time and will not happen overnight.
 
There was a strong sentiment in favor of the rail project and state Sen. Brendan Crighton, co-chair of the commission, noted how each speaker was applauded, wondering if this was just a quirk of the Berkshires.
 
The Legislature created the commission and approved a transportation bond bill to investigate and receive public comment on passenger rail service to better connect eastern and western parts of the state. The panel will issue a final report in the spring based on the public comment discussions and a feasibility analysis.
 
Farley-Bouvier cautioned the commission to not get hung up on findings but consider possibilities, noting a study against a crosswalk on a Pittsfield fell short when walking patterns changed during the pandemic.
 
Last week, the state Department of Transportation announced that it submitted an $108 million application for the Federal Railroad Administration's FY 2022 Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements grant program for corridor improvements between Worcester and Springfield.
 
President and CEO of 1Berkshire Jonathan Butler pointed out that his organization served on the initial East-West Study Committee and continues to be involved in this dialogue.
 
He said the rail connection will promote regional equity and support the visitor economy.
 
"The east-west study is a generational project for us, as our members of the delegation have already mentioned, that will represent potentially the greatest individual infrastructure investment that could be made to address a whole litany of issues from housing and economic growth, all the way to equity, and quality of life," Butler explained.
 
Berkshire Health Systems Director of Media Relations Mike Leary pointed out that the rail service is vital for patients who have to access care across the state and fill open positions.
 
Edward Sporn, who is the program manager for the Berkshire Flyer, said that the effort needs to take a regional perspective and improve Amtrak's customer interface.
 
"I'm very excited about the future," he said. "Everything seems to be lining up for a very exciting growth in passenger service in Western Massachusetts."
 
Other points brought up during the hearing were the importance of keeping costs low and how the rail has the possibility of promoting diversity in the county. It was noted that the weekend tourist Berkshire Flyer and the Greenfield-New Haven, Conn., Valley Flyer have been very successful.
 
The two-hour hearing did not get bogged down in details, with most of the testimony about local needs and economic potential, but there was some discussion about funding, infrastructure and authority. State Sen. Jo Comerford of Northampton questioned what would have to be in place. 
 
Adams Town Administrator Jay Green, former regional manager for Amtrak, said there was infrastructure in place that could be utilized, including in New York State. Farley-Bouvier said funding could be based on the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority, which has dedicated revenue from state taxes; others spoke of the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority, which operates the Downeaster with Amtrak, as a model for governance.
 
Community activist Kamaar Taliaferro of Pittsfield called in to support rail but also pointed out how issues of equity, such as how tracks tend to be in disadvantaged neighborhoods. This project could be transformational but, he said, so was urban renewal. He urged the commission to consider broader impacts in its study.
 
To submit written testimony, email commission staff at: Siobhan.Morrissey@mahouse.gov.
 

Tags: passenger rail,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories