Adams Filing Injunctions Against Two Businesses for Incomplete License Work

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

ADAMS, Mass. — The town is in the process of filing injunctions against two businesses that have not completed its licensing process. 

 

The Board of Selectmen met on Wednesday to review a few final licenses, ultimately voting unanimously to begin the injunction process for Mount Royal Inn and McDonalds. The board is still waiting on a final inspection for Mount Royal Inn, which it discussed extensively at its last meeting and are also waiting on renewal paperwork and payment of taxes from McDonald's. 

 

"We act as the town's licensing board. I just don't understand how we can go forward this evening with not starting the injunction process," said board Chair John Duval, noting that this work should have been done prior to the start of the new year. 

 

Attorney Jeff Grandchamp, who attended the meeting representing Mount Royal Inn, asked for an extension on behalf of owner Syed Bokhari. He said Bokhari is on vacation and currently out of the country. 

 

"He requested the opportunity to be present when the inspection occurred with [Building Commissioner Gerald] Garner and [Fire Chief John] Pansecchi," he said, noting that he would inform Bokhari of the board's decision. 

 

Town Administrator Jay Green said Administrative Assistant Bri Hantman has been unable to contact the owners of McDonalds, despite several attempts and a certified letter. Town Counsel Edmund St. John III said the letter had been signed for and received. 

 

"We're kind of befuddled as to what more to do for a business operating in our town," Green said. 

 

Selectman Howard Rosenberg said he felt uncomfortable with the businesses remaining open without a license. 

 

"Mr. Bokhari did not offer a good explanation why, for four years in a row, he hasn't acted in a timely way," he said. "It puts the town in a precarious position. And I think we should discuss how long we let this go on until we really have a disaster on our hands." 

 

Selectman Joseph Nowak said he has concerns for those staying at the inn from Louison House. The inn has an agreement with Louison House, which provides transitional housing for the homeless, to provide temporary housing. 

 

"As we know, they're in a contract with the Louison House. And I worry about people that are homeless. If they're shut down, and the Lousion house is at capacity, where do these people go?," he said. 

 

In other business: 

 

Resident Pam Sherman came before the board to discuss issues with contracting work on her house. She took issue with the quality and timeliness of the work. 

 

"I just wanted good work done in a timely fashion," she said. "I was looking forward to my home and getting this part of it done, and it's been nothing but a nightmare." 

 

Sherman's housework, according to Green, is part of the town's housing rehabilitation program funded by the Community Development Block Grant. Green and St. John are working with Sherman for a suitable resolution to the problem. 

 

"There's about $7,000 of work left within the initial scope that was put together for Miss Sherman's house, and the intent is to attempt to find one more contractor to complete the $7,000 worth of work so Ms. Sherman's work is completed," Green said.

 

The board plans to discuss the issue again at its second meeting in February.


Tags: license board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories