Letter: Faulty Conclusions About Youth Center

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I am disappointed that I have to write yet again to address the many faulty conclusions and misleading figures published on your website regarding the Williamstown Youth Center's funding request to the town. To publish one such letter, along with a response, seems to me a reasonable presentation of differing opinions for your readers to sort out. To publish a second does not encourage not public debate about an important issue but simply kickstarts a useless back and forth that can only cause bad feelings and muddy the discussion of a pretty simple request.

Pat Meyers can write a letter every day of the week that would only restate the concerns expressed in their original post, just as I can respond in kind to explain what is done with the $77,000 we typically ask for. But I think that would be not only a waste of time but a bad way for public policy to be debated.

That being said, there is one point that needs to be corrected. Despite the implication of Meyers' letters, the After School Program is not the only service we provide the town. We are the de facto rec committee, and offer sports programs from downhill skiing to cross country running. We are the emergency childcare provider whenever the school closes due to weather or other unforeseen event. We host Girl Scout meetings, public presentations of municipal initiatives, child care for parents attending town meeting, the Community Chest Fun Run, and a number of parent groups. We keep the calendar for use of the Elementary School's playing fields, Once again, I ask anyone reading this to provide an example of any local government that can provide the services we provide for less than $77,000 per year.


After reading Meyers' second letter I took the time to find out what percentage $77,000 is of our roughly $24 million annual town budget. It's 0.0032.

In 17 years of living in Williamstown and attending town meeting, every Finance Committee has recommended that taxpayers fulfill the Youth Center's request. More important, I recall but one or two nay votes from the floor in all those years. But we should not be funded only because people have generally positive feelings about the work that we do. We should be funded because we provide essential services that are worth every penny of the $77,000 we've received these past few years.

With gratitude,

 

Michael Williams
Executive Director, Williamstown Youth Center

Editor's Note: We agree with Mr. Williams that the Letters to the Editor are not a place for a back and forth about this subject. Two letters each is enough. Perhaps a better place for debate is a finance meeting or a town meeting. 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories