Letter: Faulty Conclusions About Youth Center

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I am disappointed that I have to write yet again to address the many faulty conclusions and misleading figures published on your website regarding the Williamstown Youth Center's funding request to the town. To publish one such letter, along with a response, seems to me a reasonable presentation of differing opinions for your readers to sort out. To publish a second does not encourage not public debate about an important issue but simply kickstarts a useless back and forth that can only cause bad feelings and muddy the discussion of a pretty simple request.

Pat Meyers can write a letter every day of the week that would only restate the concerns expressed in their original post, just as I can respond in kind to explain what is done with the $77,000 we typically ask for. But I think that would be not only a waste of time but a bad way for public policy to be debated.

That being said, there is one point that needs to be corrected. Despite the implication of Meyers' letters, the After School Program is not the only service we provide the town. We are the de facto rec committee, and offer sports programs from downhill skiing to cross country running. We are the emergency childcare provider whenever the school closes due to weather or other unforeseen event. We host Girl Scout meetings, public presentations of municipal initiatives, child care for parents attending town meeting, the Community Chest Fun Run, and a number of parent groups. We keep the calendar for use of the Elementary School's playing fields, Once again, I ask anyone reading this to provide an example of any local government that can provide the services we provide for less than $77,000 per year.


After reading Meyers' second letter I took the time to find out what percentage $77,000 is of our roughly $24 million annual town budget. It's 0.0032.

In 17 years of living in Williamstown and attending town meeting, every Finance Committee has recommended that taxpayers fulfill the Youth Center's request. More important, I recall but one or two nay votes from the floor in all those years. But we should not be funded only because people have generally positive feelings about the work that we do. We should be funded because we provide essential services that are worth every penny of the $77,000 we've received these past few years.

With gratitude,

 

Michael Williams
Executive Director, Williamstown Youth Center

Editor's Note: We agree with Mr. Williams that the Letters to the Editor are not a place for a back and forth about this subject. Two letters each is enough. Perhaps a better place for debate is a finance meeting or a town meeting. 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Updated Policy on Seclusion, Restraint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee recently approved an updated policy on time-outs, seclusion and the physical restraint of students.
 
The policy is based on updated state regulations that came down last winter. Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the panel at its August meeting that his office waited on recommendations from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees that were released in May and ran the proposed changes past the district's legal counsel.
 
That timing — and an expectation from the commonwealth that districts have the updated policy in place for the start of the 2026-27 academic year — led to an expedited process for the School Committee, which did not do a first read with a vote at a subsequent meeting as is its practice.
 
"Policy JKAA speaks to the ways the school district and our procedures shall abide by the updated state regulations," Bergeron said. "We're not going to have a lot of leeway.
 
"Nothing about the way we interact with our students on a day-to-day basis is being shifted by this."
 
For example, the commonwealth does not allow schools to use "seclusion," or, "the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area, with or without adult supervision," except some extreme cases, like when, "when student behavior poses an imminent threat of assault, or imminent serious physical harm to self or others, but only if safeguards are accounted for," the updated policy reads.
 
"From the state's perspective and my perspective, the idea of locking a child in a room without adult supervision is something we've never done," Bergeron said. "And it's something the state wants to make explicitly that nobody ever does."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories