Pittsfield Licensing Unhappy With Heavily Redacted Reports

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Licensing Board continued a hearing on Monday, saying its work was being stunted by heavily redacted, "almost indecipherable" police reports.
 
The show cause hearing was for two disturbances at Thistle and Mirth that occurred on Jan. 7 and Jan. 13.
 
The first incident was an argument that took place outside of the West Street restaurant and the second, which prompted a referral to the Licensing Board, resulted in a window being broken.
 
Board members felt that the reports provided by the Police Department did not allow them to make a well-informed decision because there were too many censored words. Knowing that it had been an issue in the past, Chairman Thomas Campoli requested to have responding officers present at the meeting to fill in the gaps.
 
To his disappointment, those officers were not in attendance.
 
"In advance of these hearings we get reports and those reports were so heavily redacted they were almost indecipherable, so that's a problem for us," Campoli said. "Because we have to make a decision here and with respect to these reports that are blacked out such that it is very difficult, it makes our job almost impossible."
 
He reported speaking to members of the Police Department about this in the past but saw no change.
 
After a brief review of the first incident, member Kathy Amuso interjected to ask that the hearing be continued until March.
 
"For me, I think it would be beneficial to Thistle for this to wait," she said.
 
Attorney Ethan Klepetar, representing co-owners Joad Bowman and Austin Oliver, said they would like a resolution as soon as possible.
 
"We are confident that the record will show that the licensee did everything appropriately," Klepetar said.
 
"They had security at the door, they call the police immediately as soon as something happens, cooperate with the police, shut the premises down, and have done everything that they could possibly do to make sure once something happens that it's taken care of appropriately and to take action to not allow it to happen again."
 
While the board's consideration was appreciated, he pointed out that both owners were present at the meeting to explain what happened.
 
Amuso stressed the importance of having police and licensee testimony so that the board does not make an adverse decision.
 
"We want to get the full information so we can make an educated decision," she said.
 
Board member Richard Stockwell said if a potential license suspension is on the table it is important to "cross all the Ts and dot all the Is."
 
Lt. Matthew Hill clarified that the first incident, which was described as "large scale disturbance" of verbal arguing outside around 12:45 a.m., would not have brought Thistle and Mirth to the Licensing Board.
 
"They are only here because of the proximity of the two instances and the severity of the second," Hill explained.
 
There is an ongoing investigation into the incident that led to property damage.

Tags: license board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Rejects Federal Police Drone Grant

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday rejected a $31,000 police drone grant after a larger conversation about surveillance and responsible data storage. 

On the agenda was $31,167 from the Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. For about two hours, councilors dug into the U.S. Department of Justice contract, found grammatical errors, and what they described as abnormally worded conditions and red flags. 

"It's not even like one red flag. It's like a whole field of red flags," Ward 7 Councilor Kathy Moody said.

They voted 9-2 to reject the grant, with only Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren and Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn in favor.  

"We should not approve a grant where the contract goes against our own policies, whether it be state or local policies, or whether the requirements in that contract go against our community's values," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"And what I heard from residents before this meeting, and what was a concern that I flagged when I first read this, is that it does go against my values and the values of our neighbors and us wanting to protect people." 

Open microphone speakers said provisions in the contract violate the Massachusetts PROTECT Act, which Gov. Maura Healey signed last month to establish statewide limits on state and local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement. 

"I'm particularly concerned about Condition 53, that would essentially require police officers to report to [the Department of Homeland Security] anyone who is being released from custody from a correctional facility, which would include local jails," resident Kamaar Taliaferro said. 

"Condition 54. This condition is in direct violation of the PROTECT Act." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories