Letter: Disappointing Responses to MCLA Homeless Proposal

Print Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

It’s been disappointing, but hardly surprising, to see the knee-jerk reactions to the proposed temporary use of a vacant MCLA dorm for transitional family housing. The stereotypes of homelessness have been alive and well among our local leaders and among the public. The conjured images of filthy drug addicts pushing shopping carts and begging for money have been splattered across social media and whispered over back fences. This is not what family homelessness looks like.

Families are some of the most difficult people to provide shelter for when they lose their housing. When you have families with kids, caregivers, multiple generations, etc.. the public’s stereotype of a homeless shelter simply does not work. The MCLA proposal is not this stereotype, yet that is what people are wrongly being led to believe by some who should know better.

Keeping a family group together is usually imperative and leads to much better outcomes. Kids will go to school. Grandma will get her pills. The family member with mental health issues will keep their home support group. Most revealing of all is that this group is statistically likely to leave transitional housing, and land on their feet, faster than almost any other. They want to work. They want to provide. But in that moment that they have lost their housing, they need a safety net, a roof over their head, and a warm meal. Berkshire Towers can provide that.



I am an MCLA parent. Are there concerns to be addressed? Of course. Extra support systems will need to be fortified and funded as part of the deal, but those are definitely doable. This is a temporary experiment that will be evaluated after 18 months. Hopefully, in a few years, MCLA will need the dorm back as enrollment increases.

But right now, our city, region and state are in an acute housing crisis that affects the vulnerable most of all. The Healey Administration is trying to do something effective with the resources we already have. We should let them try.

Greg Roach
North Adams, Mass.

 

 

 


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Clarksburg Looking to Reduce Costs of North Berkshire School Union

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday discussed its planned presentation to Thursday's North Berkshire School Union "super committee." 
 
The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at Clarksburg School. 
 
Officials have been mulling a more equitable split on the costs of the school union since last winter. The town currently pays about 54 percent of the administrative costs of the shared superintendency based on enrollment. 
 
"After reviewing a few things, we're noticing the superintendent oversees four principals, the other school committee meetings, state reporting, oversees school buildings," said Chair Daniel Haskins. 
"It just felt us at the biggest percent of 54 percent and then the next, which would be Florida, 18 percent, it just doesn't quite seem like it's a good breakdown or a fair breakdown for us."
 
The percentage changes each year but for Clarksburg it's been trending up since being in the mid-40s nearly a decade ago, while the other towns are trending down. 
 
School Committee members have also noted that while the town pays about half the cost of the superintendency, it doesn't have an equivalent vote. At the last meeting, Clarksburg had one vote out of around 10. 
 
The Select Board would like the other towns to pick up costs for the similar responsibilities (some positions are already split equally). The board is proposing that all four communities with schools — Clarksburg, Florida, Rowe and Savoy — automatically cover 10 percent and Monroe, which sends its students to Rowe, 5 percent. 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories