Letter: Mass MoCA Strike

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

On March 13, 2024, I had the opportunity to speak with the workers on strike at Mass MoCA. I spent several hours with them, listening to them, learning from them, and coming to understand them. The workers are on strike not because they don't love their work, but because they deserve to be paid sustainable wages. They don't just want a job but they want career opportunities, the ability to work at the museum and make enough in wages to provide for themselves and their families.

It's unacceptable for dedicated employees to struggle to make ends meet while working at an institution as prominent as Mass MoCA. Negotiating for fair compensation is a fundamental right, and it's disappointing that after five months of discussions, museum management has failed to reach an agreement that meets the needs of its workers. Anyone in our community can attest to the fact that the cost of living in Berkshire County is going up — and Mass MoCA staffers are not immune to these increases.

MASS MoCA is an important institution within our community. They are great at bringing people in to visit our city and they recently secured a grant to become a better economic partner with the city of North Adams. I am grateful for their presence and what they have done to help our city grow. Mass MoCA,is also a non-profit organization that enjoys tax benefits not available to commercial businesses, many of which still provide a higher wage to their workers.

If Mass MoCA truly supports economic development in our city and our community then there is no valid excuse for Mass MoCA failing to invest in its most valuable asset — the people who make it great. I stand in solidarity with the workers of Mass MoCA and urge the management to prioritize their well-being by reaching a fair agreement as soon as possible.

Ashley M. Shade
North Adams, Mass.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Worked With Both, Voting One

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The question of experience comes up during elections. At nearly 80, John Barrett III unquestionably has more years with nearly half a century as a career politician, but longevity does not guarantee stronger leadership or better outcomes, especially if we are looking forward to 10 years. Andrew Fitch who has worked non-political jobs across a wider range of roles in half that time, can bring broader skills, fresh perspectives, and a more adaptable approach to public service.

Election results show that years served do not define effectiveness or one would have the people's support. The majority, 60 percent, voted against Barrett in this same state primary nine years ago. Longevity matters, but so do community connection, collaboration, and the ability to evolve with changing needs. Serving as a state representative is very different from being a mayor. A representative is one of 160 members, not a singular executive authority, and the role requires coalition building, negotiation, and networking which has never been one of Barrett's finest attributes.

Long-standing community priorities require consistent advocacy, such as completing the North Adams bike path connection to Adams and Williamstown. Former state Rep. Gail Cariddi championed this project, and Barrett said he would finish her work when he first ran, yet North Adams is no further along. In contrast, Fitch on the City Council is respectful but persistent, pushing issues until answers, progress, and resolutions emerge.

We need someone who works well with others, not someone who relies on intimidation or positional authority. A heavy-handed style doesn't work in a large legislative body, with members averaging 30 years younger than Barrett. Small wins may look like progress, but the state distributes billions of which some reaches us no matter who holds the seat. The real question is whether we could secure more funding for roads, infrastructure, public safety, and economic development, or is the status quo of what we received the past 10 years acceptable to you?

Having served alongside both candidates on the council, I've seen how their styles shape outcomes. While one on council struggled to gain support for anything because their authoritarian approach created conflict, the other has consistently moved ideas forward through collaboration and shared credit.

That contrast may explain why Fitch consecutively lands first for City Council elections, and Barrett — despite his years as mayor before losing two elections — finished sixth. For me, the choice is straightforward: Andrew Fitch for State Representative.

Keith Bona
North Adams, Mass. 

Keith Bona is a North Adams city councilor.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories