Conte/Crosby SOI Greenlit by School Building Needs, School Committee

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Building Needs Commission and the School Committee authorized the superintendent to submit a statement of interest for a combined elementary build on the site of Crosby Elementary School.

Now the SOI needs support from the City Council, which will be decided later this month ahead of the April 12 deadline.

The proposal rebuilds Conte Community School and Crosby on the West Street site with shared facilities, as both have outdated facilities, insufficient layouts, and need significant repair. A rough timeline shows a feasibility study in 2026 with design and construction ranging from 2027 to 2029.

Following the SOI, the next step would be a feasibility study to determine the specific needs and parameters of the project, costing about $1.5 million and partially covered by the state.  There is a potential for 80 percent reimbursement through the Massachusetts School Building Association.

The SBNC took the vote on Tuesday and the School Committee on Wednesday — both unanimous.  The City Council is expected to vote on March 26.

After a site visit to both schools, committee members spoke to the risks that Conte’s open space plan poses.

Chair William Cameron pointed out one attendee commenting that there was "No way you could defend a shooter in this building."

"We’re talking about access here, which is obviously very important as a security issue but those schools, given what's happened in the United States since Columbine in 1999, how common this has become, these horrific incidents, those buildings are particularly vulnerable, it seems to me," he said.

"That the students in the classroom or the instructional areas, they're vulnerable in a way that would not be the case in say, Crosby or any of the other elementary schools where you have corridors and classrooms and doors that that shut."

Member William Garrity said an open-space layout is also difficult for students on the autism spectrum.

"I think we really, really, really, really, really need to do something with Conte and Crosby. Just going through I think, from personal experience being on the autism spectrum, the open-concept classroom just sounds ridiculous to me. I know it's really strong language there but just as a person that can get distracted by a lot of noise, I don't think I would ever learn in that environment and there's many, many, many other students like that and I think it's something we need to move past," he said.

"I think open concept classrooms had its moment in the '70s and '80s or whenever it was developed and I think we need to bring back classrooms with four walls and I think this is the way to go forward."

Superintendent Joseph Curtis said veteran teachers who had been incredibly committed to open-space schools chose to move to another district school without the layout because they "wanted a classroom with four walls."


"I started off my career in open space, went to school in open space in Springfield, and I've been a principal in open space," he said. "It does have an impact, there's no question and just some simple thoughts can lead you to that conclusion."

Silvio O. Conte Community School is an open-concept, 69,500-square-foot facility that opened in 1974. Located on West Union Street, it is not far from the proposed site on West Street.

The school was built with no walls separating the classrooms and today, temporary walls that do not reach the ceiling separate the learning areas but allow noise to travel. Originally meant to be an unlocked school that can be accessed by the community, Conte's main office is located on the second floor and is "highly unusual" for modern-day standards that require significant security.

Crosby is about 69,800 square feet and opened in 1962. It was built as a junior high school, so several aspects had to be adapted for elementary use.

"Crosby being a true junior high school and its layout and Conte and Morningside not having walls was an experience for some of the elected officials that took the tour," Curtis told the SBNC.

"There were some there that didn't realize that Conte and Morningside didn’t have walls so it was good to have them in the facilities."

He pointed out that if they were to renovate Crosby, they would still be left with a renovated junior high school rather than an elementary school.

During the tour, Curtis pointed to broken windows that cannot be fixed because the glazing contains asbestos and the higher level layout that separates administrative offices and service provider areas from the classrooms.  

School attendance zones are a point of discussion for the entire school district and for this project.

Currently, eight attendance zones designate where a student will go to elementary school. Part of the vision is to collapse those zones into three with hopes of building a plan that incorporates partner schools in each attendance zone.

The West Side zone can potentially have both partner schools, Crosby and Conte, on the same site.  These partner schools could share several common spaces including the gym, cafeteria library, and potential administrative offices which could result in a reduction in costs for maintenance.

This plan has the potential to house grades pre-kindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another with both having their own identities and administrations.

Curtis pointed to the district restructuring study that is currently underway, explaining that the MSBA will look favorably on the larger efforts.

"It does ask if we have invested in a master facilities plan which we have," he said.

"So that signals to them that it's not simply the superintendent with a desire receives authorization and then just goes to the website and submits the statement. That there is bigger thinking around this investment that has implications beyond the building investment itself."


Tags: school building committee,   school project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories