March 2024 Unemployment and Job Estimates in Mass

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — Local unemployment rates decreased in twenty-three labor market areas and remained unchanged in one labor market area in the state during the month of March 2024 compared to February 2024, the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development reported.
 
Compared to March 2023, the rates were down in seventeen of twenty-four labor market areas.
 
Of the fifteen areas for which employment estimates are published, fourteen NECTA areas gained jobs compared to the previous month. The largest percentage increases occurred in the Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead (+0.9 percent), Barnstable Town (+0.8 percent), and Worcester MA-CT (+0.7 percent) areas.
 
From March 2023 to March 2024, eleven areas gained jobs with the largest percentage increases seen in the Barnstable Town (+5.4 percent), Lynn-Saugus-Marblehead (+3.2 percent), and Pittsfield (+2.3 percent) areas.
 
The statewide seasonally adjusted preliminary jobs estimate showed an increase of 2,900 jobs in March, and an over-the-year gain of 22,500 jobs.
 
In order to compare the statewide rate to local unemployment rates, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates the statewide unadjusted unemployment rate for March 2024 was 3.5 percent, down 0.2 percentage points from the revised February 2024 estimate and was the 0.4 percentage points below the nation's unadjusted unemployment rate of 3.9 percent.
 
Last week, the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development reported the statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in the month of March 2024 was 2.9 percent, unchanged compared to the revised February 2024 estimate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the nation's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for March 2024 decreased by 0.1 percentage point over-the-month to 3.8 percent.
 
The unadjusted unemployment rates and job estimates for the labor market areas reflect seasonal fluctuations and therefore may show different levels and trends than the statewide seasonally adjusted estimates.
 
The estimates for labor force, unemployment rates, and jobs for Massachusetts are based on different statistical methodologies specified by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
 
The preliminary April 2024 and the revised March 2024 unemployment rates, labor force data and jobs estimate for Massachusetts will be released on Friday, May 17, 2024; local unemployment statistics for April 2024 will be released on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. Detailed labor market information is available at http://www.mass.gov/EconomicResearch.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

SJC: Public Records Petition 'Proper'

Staff Reports
BOSTON — The Supreme Judicial Court in an advisory opinion released Monday found the petition to bring the Legislature and governor's office under the Public Records Law is "proper" as a form of law.
 
"Its principal purpose is not to regulate the internal proceedings or operations of the two Houses," the court wrote. "Instead, its principal purpose is to provide the public with a new right of access to the records of the General Court and the office of the Governor, applying the existing public records law to those bodies alongside the other governmental bodies already subject to the law. "
 
The state Senate asked the Supreme Judicial Court to weigh in on whether public records petition was a violation of the state constitution. The Legislature is required to act on the matter by May 5; if not, supporters plan to put it on the ballot in November. 
 
Auditor Diana DiZoglio has championed the petition as a measure to bring greater transparency to the workings of state government and as part of her own battle to audit the Legislature. More than 70 percent of voters approved the audit question in November 2024. 
 
The Senate asked the court whether, first, the petition was a law or a rule that would interfere with its internal processes and, second, would it create "new and unprecedented authority" to the courts to determine challenges to records determinations.
 
The court offered "that the petition proposes a law and is therefore properly pending before the Legislature" and, for Question 2, concluded "that the proposed measure does not relate to the powers of courts."
 
The court declined to answer three following questions related to intrusions on Senate authority and General Court authority, and violation of rights of  "deliberation, speech and debate" granted to members and staff.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories