image description
The former Zip's is being converted into two apartments with the endorsement of the neighborhood.

Dalton Zoning Board OKs Conversion of Zip's Bar into Apartments

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday approved the conversion of the former Zip's Bar & Billiards into four apartments. 
 
The owner, Ron Carver, submitted an application for a special permit requesting to convert the first floor of the tavern into residential apartments.  
 
"The former tenant went out of business. He was operating a bar/nightclub and had lost business and decided after COVID that it just wasn't worth his while to continue," board Chair Anthony Doyle said.
 
"So Mr. Carver is left with an empty commercial space, and the question is do you try to get another bar in there or do you do something else, and he opted to convert."
 
The detailed application that Carver submitted was described by board members as impressive. The notice of the public hearing was posted on April 23 and 30 to alert neighbors to come and speak. 
 
Despite the public hearing notice, no one attended the meeting to speak against the application, which is a good indication that the neighbors support it, Doyle said. 
 
Carver attended the meeting and provided a letter from one of the neighbors expressing their support for the change. 
 
"Due to work conflicts. We couldn't be there for the upcoming town meeting concerning the construction work on 191 East Housatonic St. As a neighbor at 199 East Housatonic St. we fully support any changes made to the property," the letter says. 
 
The property is located in an R-2 district, which is a multiple-family residential zone, and is boarded by residential properties. 
 
City records indicated that the property was built in 1875 and was formerly the Edmare Cafe. However, the site was later used as a bar and nightclub for many decades. 
 
The use of the facility as a nightclub is "impractical," "undesirable," and has been financially unsustainable post pandemic, the application narrative says.
 
"Further nightclub use is undesirable from the neighborhood perspective based upon past interactions with the neighborhood," the document says.
 
"This proposal is a compromise from the non-residential use to a multi-family use in the residential zone." 
 
A new front door would be installed to "improve access/egress from the existing second-floor apartments," and a new sidewalk would be installed "to facilitate pedestrian access from the parking to the front entrance." 
 
A sprinkler system would be installed, and the existing exterior fire escape would be removed "as they are no longer required." 
 
The project would involve an interior renovation of the building and converting the buildings into apartments. 
 
"The upstairs will be renovated to improve the stairs and egress as part of the project. Overall, the project will increase the existing apartment count from two existing apartments to four total apartments at this location," the application documentation says. 
 
The proposal's traffic estimates suggest that traffic would be lower during peak periods, except for the morning peak time, compared to its current use.
 
"The peak morning estimate is 15 trips, which is not significant from a traffic perspective," the application says. 
 
The Traffic Commission and Board of Health reviewed the application during their meetings in April and expressed that they had no concerns about the project. 
 
There is currently parking on site for more than 30 vehicles. 
 
There would be no parking in the front yard except for the multi-dwelling’s off-street parking. 
 
"The existing parking is screened and shall be reduced to six parking spaces with screening to remain," the application says. 
 
Any parking area with more than five parking spaces would be screened. 
 
The parking area for ten or more cars would be contained or "bordered by trees and/or plantings as necessary to effectively screen adjoining properties and provide visual relief from broad expanses of pavement." 
 
The proposed sewer and water use will be less than half of the current use, the application says.
 
"The renovation will require a new water service to support the installation of a sprinkler system in the building," the application says. 
 
In other news: 
 
The board approved the special permit for Susan Korte to expand her 2,240-square-foot barn by 288 feet to make room for more farm equipment, animals, and hay. Korte has sheep, goats, two mini horses, and geese, which she has rescued. The siding will match the current barn, so it will appear seamless. 
 
The board expressed no concerns as the work she is doing there is permitted, the change complies with town bylaws, and there is plenty of space on the parcel. 

Tags: ZBA,   apartments,   housing,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories