image description
The Select Board is considering whether to recommend more electric vehicle charging stations since much of the cost would be reimbursed. Above, charging stations were installed at the Senior Center in 2017 through state grants.

Dalton Select Board Approves Research into EV Charging Stations

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board expressed its support in continuing to research the prospect of installing level three electric vehicle fast charging stations in town. 
 
During its meeting earlier this month, Green Committee member Tony Pagliarulo gave a presentation by Connecticut solar energy company Earthlight Technologies. 
 
"We have no fast chargers in Berkshire County other than the Tesla banks down in South County. So fast chargers are really the future. I mean, you're going to charge up in 30 to 40 minutes, and then you're on your way," Pagliarulo said. 
 
Due to the number of tax credits and incentives available for the town the insulation of these stations would make the town money, he said. 
 
The total cost of installing the charging stations at Pinegrove would be about $167,000, but the town would receive a $145,000 utility incentive, so it would only have to pay $22,044.08. 
 
This amount would be split into two payments of about $11,000, to be paid in the middle and the conclusion of the project. 
 
However, at the end of the tax year, following the completion of the project, the town will be credited $50,188.89 because it is entitled to 30 percent of the total cost under the Inflation Reduction Act. 
 
"The key to this is that the federal government has realized that municipalities don't get tax credits because we don't pay taxes, but they have provided an alternate means to give the municipalities the amount of money that a private individual would have as a tax credit if they did the same project," Town Manager Tom Hutcheson, said. 
 
The town would earn $28,000 from the installation of these chargers, Pagliarulo said.  
 
"These are 480-volt systems, dual ports, and they'd be metered separately, much like the other chargers [at the Senior Center] or at the CRA."
 
The cost of installing the chargers at Greenridge is slightly more, about $175,000, but the town would receive a utility incentive of approximately $145,000, so it would only be responsible for $27,618.95. 
 
Following the completion of the project at the end of the tax year, the town would be credited $51,861.35 under the IRA tax credit. 
 
Pagliarulo requested that the board approve continued research into this initiative so that it can develop a concrete plan to present to voters at a special town meeting or for the board to consider using American Rescue Plan Act funds at a future meeting. 
 
The ARPA funds are currently frozen until the Police Station issues are addressed
 
Another option Pagliarulo is discussing with the company is to see if it would be willing to have the town sign over the credits in lieu of payment if voters approve the initiative during a special town meeting. 
 
The company's representative is running this request "up the ladder" at Earthlight, Pagliarulo said. 
 
"I'm in support of some, particularly when you look at the net cost after tax credit, depreciation, and incentives, which means we're getting paid to put these in," Select Board Vice Chairman Daniel Esko said. 
 
The board had previously approved negotiations with Livingston Energy Group for Direct Current Fast Chargers at Pine Grove Park, the Senior Center, and Greenridge Park, but town counsel and company could not come to an agreement.  
 
"I will say that Livingston Energy, who we had been in contact with and discussion with, did not come through, so we could not reach agreement on that," Pagliarulo said. 
 
"I want to thank [Hutcheson] and our attorney also for the work they did to bring it to a conclusion, but we could not." 

Tags: charging stations,   electric vehicle,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories