Letter: Kamala Harris' Visit Was for the Money

To the Editor:

I hope the Harris campaign thanked iBerkshires for the free advertising you gave them about her visit to Pittsfield for a lavish fundraiser at the Colonial Theatre. Make no mistake, Kamala didn't come to the Berkshires because she cares about what average people are struggling with in the 413 area code — she came because privileged followers donated $1.4 million.

I am under no illusion that she will keep us out of World War III, curtail the impending climate catastrophe, raise the national minimum wage, significantly reduce crushing student debt, or fight to get us Medicare for All. She takes big money from superPACs including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and such donors will heavily influence her policies. Martin Luther King said that people should be judged "for the content of their character," and this should apply today to Kamala Harris, who superficially might seem like a good leader for our troubled country. Let's not forget that as Attorney General of California she prosecuted the impoverished parents of truant children while not prosecuting investment banker Steve Mnuchin for his role in the 2007-8 financial crisis.

The election of 2024 is not just a contest between the two corporately controlled political parties. I strongly reject both the Democrats and Republicans, neither of which work to significantly improve the lives of average Americans. Both are corrupt and support needless wars and a genocide in Palestine. Trump has been convicted for his payments to a porn star, but every high level member of the Biden/Harris administration should also be prosecuted for being partners in the Palestinian Genocide. And it is not anti-Semitic to say that Israel is an apartheid, racist, settler colonial state whose foundation was based on land theft and forced displacement of an indigenous population. Many American Jews like me share the conviction that anti-Zionism is not a form of anti-Semitism, and that the phrase "never again" must mean never again to anyone.

There is another choice that should be reported by our media, assuming that balanced reporting is the goal. Jill Stein is seeking the Green Party nomination, she doesn't take big donor money or have a superPAC supporting her, she is pro-labor, pro-climate, pro-peace, and anti-genocide. It's time to put the lives of ordinary people over corporate profits by voting for her for president.

Henry Rose
Dalton, Mass.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
05:50AM / Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'

DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 

 

The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.

 

"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.

 

"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 

 

Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 

 

Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 

 

Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.