image description
Town officials are still discussing options for Dalton Division Road.

Dalton to Talk Roundabout, Designs for Dalton Division Road

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board will discuss at it's meeting on Tuesday, Nov. 12, whether to reconsider its preferred option for the preliminary designs of Dalton Division Road. 
 
During a meeting last December, the Select Board voted to advocate for Concept A, which would have sidewalks on both sides, a 5-foot bike lane in the road on both sides with a buffer, and a 2-foot painted buffer between the vehicle lane and in the bike lane. They also recommended the two-way stop control option. 
 
This would be the most expensive and "certainly not" the engineer or the state's "preferred design," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
The town's engineers are scheduled to speak at the next board meeting. 
 
The town's engineers are ready for the next step of the project, which will be starting to finalize the plan that the town approves for the state, he said. 
 
Hutcheson said he reviewed this with Chair Robert Bishop and Vice Chair Dan Esko, and there were some sentiments to revisit the decision that was made previously. 
 
Esko said that he supports the roundabout and the most affordable "path of least resistance to get this project done" in a timely fashion. 
 
"At the end of the day, getting a sidewalk on that whole road is a win. "It doesn't really matter what side it's on, to be honest with you," Esko said, with Bishop agreeing to this sentiment. 
 
Board members Marc Strout, former member Joe Diver, and Esko voted to advocate for Concept A at last year's meeting. 
 
They raised concerns about the preliminary designs' value for town residents, specifically noting that the Dalton side would not receive sidewalks despite paying for the associated project costs.
 
The project has challenges surrounding wetlands, state Department of Transportation requirements, and easements. 
 
The project would examine redesigns of the intersection off Williams Street, Washington Mountain Road, and Mountain Road to improve safety.
 
The two intersection options were a roundabout and a two-way stop control. The roundabout would require a permanent fee. 
 
Steve Savaria, Fuss & O'Neil project manager and senior traffic engineer, said during the December meeting that the existing roadway already crosses private property, so it would need to be corrected regardless. 
 
However, there would be about 6,000 square feet of the lot on the corner where Shire Donuts is located.  
 
Some of the construction of the intersection will take place over the line onto Williams Street so MassDOT does view this project as being in both municipalities, Savaria said during the December meeting. 
 
Last December, Diver motioned to advocate for the two-way stop control option because it is a new scope because of state requirements. 
 
If MassDOT chooses the roundabout option, the town could also be responsible for the "land grab." 
 
Boyle and Diver agreed that Pittsfield should pay at least half the cost of the project because it would benefit the city just as much as Dalton, if not more, if there were only sidewalks on the Pittsfield side.
 
"It works fine now. Make some minor corrections to it, and move forward because I would not support more funds to take over land when we don't even know what our next capital plan is for the next one or two years," Diver said in December. 
 
Bishop was absent during the December meeting, and Boyle was against the motion to advocate for he two-way stop control option because he favored the roundabout design.
 
Savaria said during the December meeting that the two-way stop control option would have little impact on traffic operations.
 
"You would still have the same issues with the geometry of the intersection being contrary to people's normal expectation of the right away, and that's the problem that you have there now. That the main flow is going around the corner instead of going straight in any direction," he said. 
 
During the Monday night meeting, Boyle expressed his strong disagreement with the decision made in December to advocate for the two-way stop control option. 
 
He noted that the chairman at the time, Diver, did not seek input from the police chief, fire chief, Department of Public Works director, or officials from neighboring towns before making the motion.
 
Following the December meeting, the Traffic Commission weighed in on the topic, and some felt the roundabout was "a better alternative." More information here
 
At the December meeting, Diver originally motioned to pause the project to inform the Metropolitan Planning Organization that the board had "major concerns." 
 
Boyle agreed with this motion, but it was later voted down due to worries of delaying the project. 

Tags: road project,   roundabout,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories