Pittsfield School Officials Making Budget Recommendations Wednesday

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee will make recommendations for the district's fiscal year 2026 budget on Wednesday.

This follows a workshop on April 2, where principals and district leaders presented their facility's breakdown with a 2.15 percent reduction to meet costs and a public hearing on Monday, which garnered no participation.

The $87 million budget proposal includes an $18 million city contribution and more than $68 million of anticipated Chapter 70 funding. It is a $3,765,084 increase from FY25.

Superintendent Joseph Curtis reported on several outreach efforts to maintain transparency during this budget season, including "much more communication" with Pittsfield Public Schools staff, a survey, and a video overview to the Pittsfield Public School Council.

"At our next meeting, which is just two days away, the School Committee will be able to offer any suggestions for the budget, as it stands right now, so we'll certainly look forward to that if anybody has any suggestions," he said on Monday.

"And then we would make any modifications, if necessary, and bring that back to the committee on Wednesday, April 30, for hopefully final adoption."

The proposed $86,450,361 spending plan has $1,238,000 in payroll reductions, but district officials anticipate cuts will be made through job movement, attrition, retirements, etc.

Contractual increases and additional obligations are anticipated to exceed $5 million, and $1,294,916 must be reduced to meet the FY26 city appropriation. Contractual obligations account for more than $3 million alone.


Other budget drivers include $820,000 of special education out-of-district tuition, $120,000 in utility cost increases, and $770,000 in transportation costs. Utility projections are based on the 15 percent rate increase in January.

The budget exercise on April 2 examined every school, academy, and central office, with a 2.15 percent reduction.

"It's important to point out that this year, we felt strongly that the principals be the sole decision maker in their reduction so we have done it in a myriad of different ways in the past, but this year, they really worked closely with the staff and school councils," Curtis explained, adding that a previous budget exercise factored a 6.65 percent reduction so school leaders were tremendously relieved when asked to work with a lesser reduction.

The presentations included information about the school's local staffing budget, reductions, demographics, staff members, and key focus areas on the school improvement plans.

Silvio O. Conte Community School has the highest budget at the elementary level, $4,292,934, and a 2.15 percent reduction would cut $92,406. This would cut the full-time equivalent of one classroom teacher, interventionist, and paraprofessional but adds a family engagement & attendance coordinator who monitors attendance, provides community resources for at-risk families, and assists with social-emotional learning interventions with students.

The school has nearly 350 enrolled students, 88.5 percent of whom are economically disadvantaged, 21 percent receive special education services, and 29 percent are multilingual.

The city's two middle schools, Herberg and Reid, have about $5.3 million local staffing budgets and around $114,000 in reductions. Herberg would see the reduction of one full-time equivalent teacher and paraprofessional, and Reid would see the reduction of two FTE teachers and one paraprofessional while adding three FTE teachers and three FTE paraprofessionals to accommodate special education inclusion.

Pittsfield High School has a local staffing budget of $8,261,211 and $177,740 in reductions, including about two FTE teachers, one FTE dean of students, and adds a FTE teacher of deportment.  Taconic's $9,103,009 local staffing budget has $195,852 in reductions, including three FTE teachers.


Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories