Letter: Williamstown Dealing in Toxic Sludge to Save Money? Madness

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

While Williamstown builds a $20 million fire station, Bob Menicocci and the Finance Committee expect us to be up in arms about $500,000 to deal with a very real environmental problem in a responsible fashion — toxic sludge.

Waste water treatment in Williamstown yields effluent (discharged to the Hoosic River where there is a PFAS advisory on fish from the Mass Department of Health) and sludge — a concentrated byproduct. The proposal before us is to start taking toxic sludge from other towns because the town wants to lower costs and we have the capacity.

But what is the trade-off? The trade-off is increased liability for Williamstown who would become a producer/source of toxic waste spread on New York agricultural fields (that is, our food and water) and environmental contamination. As the country scrambles to find ways to filter PFAS from our drinking water, given that it causes cancer, Williamstown wants to sign on to spreading more of the chemical around? Madness. It's a terrible idea. We should tell Casella "No" at the Select Board meeting April 14, Town Hall, 31 North St. at 7 p.m.

We can't on the one hand say: PFAS "forever chemicals" cause intractable harm to humans, ecosystems and animals, but then also say, let's put them into our food at varying levels depending on any given state legislature. Maine and Connecticut have banned the land application of PFAS chemicals; Vermont is extremely stringent; they have the right idea! Because various New England farms have been contaminated, Casella seeks to send the product to New York, essentially taking advantage of regulatory lag time. Lawmakers haven't banned it there yet. We should not be a partner in this kind of short-term exploitation.

Williamstown has it's own PFAS problem. The Hoosac Water Quality District has not explained the planned testing protocol for incoming sludge: What is the type and frequency of testing? PFAS bioaccumulates in the environment and our bloodstream. Yet, they talk of expansion. With a PFAS advisory on the Hoosic, apparently our method is leading to contamination, which doesn't make me want to say: Let's scale up! Harmful heavy metals also exist in the sludge and effluent. Human waste is a bad fertilizer in general. Too much junkfood and pharmaceuticals. Now, Williamstown wants to go into the toxic sludge business to save $500,000? Madness.

Todd Fiorentino
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Select Board Candidates Answer Questions

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — While three seats on the Select Board will be on the ballot at the May 13 annual town election, just one seat is contested.
 
Longtime board member Jane Patton is opposed by Shana Dixon, chair of the town's Diversity, Inclusion and Racial Equity Committee, to fill out the remaining year of a three-year term vacated last year by Andrew Hogeland, who moved out of the area.
 
iBerkshires.com asked the two candidates a series of questions about their priorities and philosophies. Their responses are below. 
 
The Williamstown League of Women Voters is also hosting a forum with Dixon and Patton, moderated by Jennifer Howlett, on Tuesday, April 29, at 7 p.m. at Town Hall. It will air on Willinet. 
 
The deadline to register to vote in the town election and participate in the May 22 annual town meeting is Friday, May 2, at 5 p.m.
 

QUESTION 1

After a couple years of relatively low to negligible increases in the property tax rate, Williamstown at this year's town meeting will be asked to approve a spending plan that will significantly raise the levy. As one of five people who would be responsible for directing the town manager, do you feel that the town side of the budget is too high, too low or right-sized to provide the services that residents need? If your answer is too high or too low, what sorts of changes would you recommend the manager make?
 
DIXON
As a town, we face real needs — from maintaining infrastructure to ensuring public services remain strong and equitable. If the proposed budget reflects a thoughtful investment in those priorities, I'm open to supporting it. As of right now, I feel that the budget is right-sized.
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories