Pittsfield School Committee Adopts $86M Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Pittsfield Public School's budget for the upcoming fiscal year includes added communication supports and a special project manager.

The School Committee on Wednesday adopted a $86,450,361 budget for fiscal year 2026 that includes an $18 million city contribution and more than $68 million of anticipated Chapter 70 funding.

It is a $3,765,084 increase from this year. With $450,000 in school choice and Richmond tuition funds, it totals $86,900,361.

While the bottom line stayed the same, this iteration of the budget accommodates the School Committee's two requests, reallocating $20,000 for contracted communications services and $80,000 for a special project manager to guide the middle school restructuring and the Crosby Elementary School rebuild.

This was covered by reducing the technology renewal cycle line by $100,000.

"We we started the year with a $200,000 reduction in that line, and we were able to put those funds back based on hiring in the FY25 budget and so we are proposing reducing that by $100,000 at this point to add two additional things that were brought up for our consideration and for your consideration at our last meeting," Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke said.

She explained that the district needs assistance with both ongoing and crisis communications, which tend to have different rates, and "depending on what's happening in the district, it might make sense to have contracts for both."

"We do some excellent, excellent work in this district. As a parent, I can tell you that. As someone who sits up here and has sat up here for a number of years, I can tell you that. We do not do a good job getting that story out," Behnke said.

"When we talked about the number of websites that we have in the district, that's a lot of how we get some of that stuff out. We could do it in a better, more cohesive manner, but we need help doing that, and it would cost a lot more money, I think, if we had somebody full-time on staff."



Superintendent Joseph Curtis will step down from his position at the end of the school year after 30 years with the district. The special project manager aims to provide support on the district's significant action items while the new superintendent is getting acclimated.

"I think there's enough in the day-to-day, managing the district, working with the principals, and doing what they need to do that to add these things on to an interim superintendent might be too much. It might also be inconsistent, at best, if we were to break that up and do it with our current staff," said Matthew Bishop, assistant superintendent of curriculum, instruction, and educational engagement.

"… I think you're going to get a far better process than if we're trying to manage that on top of everything else because it's important, and we want the attention to be paid to it."

School Committee member Sara Hathaway sees this as a good investment, recognizing that the district expects to hire an interim superintendent for one year.

"We may have to look at whether we extend that based on how the search goes for the permanent replacement. It seems like one way to guarantee some continuity would be to say we are hiring somebody for the school building piece, separate from the interim superintendent. If the permanent superintendent has experience in that, feels they can take it on, great. If the first year of the permanent superintendent, they're going to have their hands full with other issues, perhaps we would look at extending the project manager for the school building project at that point," she said.

"I think we need to be open to that. I think we need to realize that Mr. Curtis' workload was probably excessive and will not be duplicated — should not be duplicated by whoever we hire to take that position, so this is a good solution to make sure that this project goes forward in service to our students."

Mayor Peter Marchetti again highlighted the importance of sustainability. In FY26, there were more than $5 million in contractual increases and additional obligations. The nearly $1.3 million budget gap was bridged through job movement, attrition, retirements, etc.

"If we turn to the city side, depending upon if we're using the governor's budget or the House budget, unrestricted government aid increased by $233,000 for the entire city budget on the governor's side and zero increase on the House side," he said.

"Our revenues are depleting, and so at some point in time, we continue to say this, we're not gonna be able to sustain the city as a whole. I'll support the budget, but we've got to start making— and I don't know what they are, right— different strategic decisions. We're going to be forced to at some point in time, and maybe as early as this year if we lose title funding, so we have to start thinking outside the box to be prepared for that if it does happen."


Tags: fiscal 2026,   pittsfield_budget,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories