Letter: In Response to: Dalton Finance Committee — Thank you

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I debated if I should submit a response to this letter or if I should just let it go. I felt a response was needed as the author of the letter published June 30, 2025, Ms. Schmidt, is an elected official of the Dalton Finance Committee. Her comment that a Request for Information is a form of harassment is outlandish and an insult to open government.

I assume I am one of the requestors who is "harassing" the Finance Committee by using the state law of public records to receive information from a committee which is not transparent. As the public reads this letter, know that the Finance Committee members use their personal email accounts for committee and town business. According to the secretary of state, as published in a guide for members of public boards in 2022, private email use is a public record if used in the course of committee business: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/guide-for-members-of-public-boards-and-commissions-chapter-9

Examples of the requests I made include:

1. Public records request for email contacts for all Finance Committee members. Once elected, officials should be reachable to hear from residents. Chair [William] Drosehn did not want to provide the information so the request was made. In addition, the request made was not delivered timely per the state law (within 10 days).


2. Public records request made related to the police budget and related email communication from the Finance Committee chair and Vice Chairman Tom Irwin. In this case, the emails sent/received by Vice Chairman Irwin were not delivered. Since he uses a private email address, I assume he believes that he does not need to respond to the request by the Dalton Records Access Officer. Therefore, an appeal has been submitted to the state supervisor of records and this is pending a decision which will be reached within 10 days.

So if Ms. Schmidt believes that this is harassment, all I can do is disagree. I call it forcing open government which is the right of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and required under the General Laws of the Commonwealth.

If our elected officials believe that the public should not make these types of requests, we should be cautious as to who we elect to office.

However, I do agree with Ms. Schmidt to a point. Members of our Finance Committee do deserve a thank you but only a few. Others should be more transparent and lead in their role as chair and vice chair or the committee should relieve them of that responsibility.

Joe Diver
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories