Letter: In Response to: Dalton Finance Committee — Thank you

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I debated if I should submit a response to this letter or if I should just let it go. I felt a response was needed as the author of the letter published June 30, 2025, Ms. Schmidt, is an elected official of the Dalton Finance Committee. Her comment that a Request for Information is a form of harassment is outlandish and an insult to open government.

I assume I am one of the requestors who is "harassing" the Finance Committee by using the state law of public records to receive information from a committee which is not transparent. As the public reads this letter, know that the Finance Committee members use their personal email accounts for committee and town business. According to the secretary of state, as published in a guide for members of public boards in 2022, private email use is a public record if used in the course of committee business: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/guide-for-members-of-public-boards-and-commissions-chapter-9

Examples of the requests I made include:

1. Public records request for email contacts for all Finance Committee members. Once elected, officials should be reachable to hear from residents. Chair [William] Drosehn did not want to provide the information so the request was made. In addition, the request made was not delivered timely per the state law (within 10 days).


2. Public records request made related to the police budget and related email communication from the Finance Committee chair and Vice Chairman Tom Irwin. In this case, the emails sent/received by Vice Chairman Irwin were not delivered. Since he uses a private email address, I assume he believes that he does not need to respond to the request by the Dalton Records Access Officer. Therefore, an appeal has been submitted to the state supervisor of records and this is pending a decision which will be reached within 10 days.

So if Ms. Schmidt believes that this is harassment, all I can do is disagree. I call it forcing open government which is the right of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and required under the General Laws of the Commonwealth.

If our elected officials believe that the public should not make these types of requests, we should be cautious as to who we elect to office.

However, I do agree with Ms. Schmidt to a point. Members of our Finance Committee do deserve a thank you but only a few. Others should be more transparent and lead in their role as chair and vice chair or the committee should relieve them of that responsibility.

Joe Diver
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Law Enforcement Officials Endorse Fenton for Governor's Council

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

Michael Fenton, a Springfield attorney, ran unsuccessfully for the 8th District seat on the council in 2022. He is challenging incumbent Tara Jacobs of North Adams. 
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Ranking Berkshire law enforcement officials are putting their weight behind a Springfield lawyer for Governor's Council in the September Democratic primary over North Adams incumbent Tara Jacobs.
 
The Berkshires' District Attorney Timothy Shugrue, Sheriff Thomas Bowler, and Clerk of Courts Lisa Denault-Viale touted Michael Fenton's experience and approach over Jacobs, who bested him and two other attorneys in 2022.  
 
The Governor's Council advises the governor on matters relating to judicial appointments, treasury warrants, pardons and commutations, and a number of other important executive functions. The winner of the primary will represent the 8th District, which covers more than 100 cities and towns including North Adams, Adams, Pittsfield, Greenfield, Northampton and Springfield, as there is no other candidate on the November ballot.
 
Gathering at Park Square on Wednesday morning, Shugrue said Jacobs does not provide the representation Berkshire County requires and deserves. 
 
"This individual [Fenton] would conduct himself with a great deal of common sense and confidence," Bowler said. 
 
Fenton said there are only 11 Superior Court judges assigned to Western Mass, and that too few of them are from Berkshire County. 
 
"At one time there were four vacancies. That left only seven judges serving the entire 102 cities and towns of the western region. Seven judges serving 102 cities and towns at a time when you add Hampden County, Springfield, Holyoke, and Chicopee in, at a time when there were over 100 pending murder cases. Seven judges for 100 pending murder cases," he said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories