image description
The Licensing Board is questioning the status of the alcohol license for Chili's, which closed a year ago.

Pittsfield Licensing Board Wants Movement on Chili's

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Licensing Board wants to see movement at the former Chili's. If not, it could be forced to revoke the liquor license. 

On Monday, the board continued an update from Chili's Grill and Bar on the status of its alcohol license after a year of closure. The company says there are interested buyers, and the board wants to hear more details at its October meeting. 

The current lease agreement goes out to 2029, and the company, Pepper Dining Inc., is looking for another business to carry it out.

"We do have this mandate from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that says, if a licensee doesn't operate its business, or, in the alternative, doesn't sell it in a reasonable period of time, what we're supposed to do is cancel the license so that it'll go away and go away forever," Chair Thomas Campoli explained. 

"You guys don't want that to happen, obviously. The City of Pittsfield doesn't want that to happen either." 

Chili's closed abruptly in August 2024 after six years in business. 

In January, the company reported that there were multiple interested parties, but nothing solid. On Monday, representative Jacob August reported that they are "adamant" about selling the Berkshire Crossing location. 


"They did brief me and the team that handles real estate transactions; they were vague in the description, but they were adamant that they are in the process of finding a buyer and talking with them. To the details I can't speak," he said, explaining that the goal is to sell the restaurant and Annual All Alcohol 7-Day license as a package. 

Board member Kathy Amuso said she wanted more information about a time frame. 

"I know you're saying you don't know, but we've been told interested parties for quite a long time," she said. 

The board also discussed allowing wine and malt beverage license holders to trade in for an all-alcohol license, which new state legislation now allows.  

On June 30, Gov. Maura Healey signed an act that allows local boards to allow M.G.L. c. 138, § 12 in premise wines and malt beverages license holders to trade in their license for a non-transferable all alcoholic beverages license. 

"The law says that we can have this process if the local licensing board allows that to happen. We don't have to do this, but we can do this if we want to do it," Campoli explained. 

Because there were some unanswered questions about the number of wine and malt licenses in Pittsfield and the costs to obtain them, the conversation was continued to the next meeting.  


Tags: license board,   alcohol license,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories