Pittsfield Schools Falling Behind on Attendance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Pittsfield Public Schools' "scary" attendance rates fall below the state average, and the district is trying to determine the root causes so they can be addressed. 

"Really, there's only one or two districts, Holyoke is one, that is higher than us, but there aren't a lot of full districts that rank higher than Pittsfield," Jennifer Stokes, assistant superintendent for school transformation and accountability, said after reporting that Pittsfield schools are listed as 14th in the state for chronic absenteeism. 

This was presented during Wednesday's School Committee meeting. Interim Superintendent Latifah Philips said it's essential to examine these challenges and determine why Pittsfield students are missing so much school. 

"As I continue with my entry planning, reviewing data, I am preparing to make a recommendation for something we should do for next year, and then that will also be aligned with the budget recommendation," she said. 

Chronic absenteeism is defined by 10 percent absences, which translates to 18 absences per student in a 180-day academic year. These include excused absences, unexcused absences, and suspensions. 

Stokes forewarned that the data was tough to look at before displaying a chart with chronic absenteeism rates between 2019 and 2025. Last school year, 38.6 percent of Pittsfield students were chronically absent, and 48.6 percent of students with disabilities were chronically absent. 

This is more than double the state's rate of 18.8 percent; 26.5 percent for students with disabilities. 

For the 2025-2026 school year, PPS has an 89.4 percent cumulative attendance rate, below the 92 percent goal. Only Allendale, Capeless, Williams, Egremont, and Stearns elementary schools are meeting the district's attendance goals as of October's end. 

"The attendance data is pretty scary to look at and very concerning," Stokes said. "So we want to really dig into what is the root cause of the attendance problem in Pittsfield." 



The district has coordinated focus groups to further analyze the data. They will see how absenteeism varies across students and timeframes, identify contributing factors, how existing policies and supports address (and don't address) attendance challenges, and how stakeholders define success in reducing absenteeism. 

Every school has an attendance team that meets weekly, and there is a weekly district-level team that pulls data for students who are at risk for attendance problems, Stokes reported, as well as community partnerships. 

Chair William Cameron said this almost has to be looked at student-by-student.  He commended this as an important study, recognizing that it will take a lot of work. 

"I don't think there's a reason they don't [attend school.] I think there are 100 reasons," he said. 

"Every student may have a different reason based on their own experience in school, out of school, and so to try to figure out a strategy for improving attendance, I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all strategy here. I think this is a great project to work on, but it is going to be labor-intensive." 

Phillips said it is also important to look at attendance by grade level. 

"Because at the elementary level, you're relying heavily on the parent transporting the students, so we need to understand where is the challenge there. Middle and high, there's much more independence," she said, explaining that there could be patterns within the different age levels. 

Cameron added that students who stop going to school regularly around 6 or 7 years old are "much more likely to run into all kinds of problems, including attendance issues, as they get older." The problem, he said, is that the issue spans across the entire district.

He stressed the importance of acclimating students in the lower grades. 

PPS Absenteeism by Brittany Polito


Tags: absenteeism,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

CBRSD Makes Cuts to Lower Town Assessments

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — School officials say reductions in the Central Berkshire Regional School District's budget will be felt, but remain optimistic that it will not prevent them from being "the best regional district in the state."
 
Throughout the budgeting season, officials said they strived to keep the seven member towns informed amid contractual increases outside their control and concerns with a state aid funding formula described as "remarkably wrong."
 
The initial budget was about a 9 percent increase, but with "strategic reductions" the district was able to cut that down to 2.99 percent, bringing the total budget to $37,740,005. 
 
"This was no small feat," said Paul Farella, district's Finance Committee chair.
 
In earlier budget drafts, towns voiced concerns over significantly higher assessments, which ranged from approximately 7 to 15 percent, compared to prior years, when it was about 2 to 7 percent. 
 
With the revised budget, projected net town assessments are: 
  • Becket for $2,859,205, an increase of 5.49 percent
  • Cummington for $670,246, an increase of 5.11 percent 
  • Dalton for $10,106,445, an increase of 5.86 percent
  • Hinsdale for $3,277,495, an increase of 10.54 percent 
  • Peru for $1,083,751, an increase of 6.11 percent 
  • Washington for $826,774, an increase of 6.64 percent
  • Windsor for $995,438, an increase of 9.37 percent
"[The cuts] will be felt, but we believe that it is what is necessary for the time being to not overburden our towns while still being able to provide a quality education to our community," Farella said. 
 
Delivering high-quality education while responsibly managing public funds in a district, which like many rural areas, faces financial constraints is a duty Superintendent Michael Henault said he takes very seriously.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories