Pittsfield Schools Falling Behind on Attendance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Pittsfield Public Schools' "scary" attendance rates fall below the state average, and the district is trying to determine the root causes so they can be addressed. 

"Really, there's only one or two districts, Holyoke is one, that is higher than us, but there aren't a lot of full districts that rank higher than Pittsfield," Jennifer Stokes, assistant superintendent for school transformation and accountability, said after reporting that Pittsfield schools are listed as 14th in the state for chronic absenteeism. 

This was presented during Wednesday's School Committee meeting. Interim Superintendent Latifah Philips said it's essential to examine these challenges and determine why Pittsfield students are missing so much school. 

"As I continue with my entry planning, reviewing data, I am preparing to make a recommendation for something we should do for next year, and then that will also be aligned with the budget recommendation," she said. 

Chronic absenteeism is defined by 10 percent absences, which translates to 18 absences per student in a 180-day academic year. These include excused absences, unexcused absences, and suspensions. 

Stokes forewarned that the data was tough to look at before displaying a chart with chronic absenteeism rates between 2019 and 2025. Last school year, 38.6 percent of Pittsfield students were chronically absent, and 48.6 percent of students with disabilities were chronically absent. 

This is more than double the state's rate of 18.8 percent; 26.5 percent for students with disabilities. 

For the 2025-2026 school year, PPS has an 89.4 percent cumulative attendance rate, below the 92 percent goal. Only Allendale, Capeless, Williams, Egremont, and Stearns elementary schools are meeting the district's attendance goals as of October's end. 

"The attendance data is pretty scary to look at and very concerning," Stokes said. "So we want to really dig into what is the root cause of the attendance problem in Pittsfield." 



The district has coordinated focus groups to further analyze the data. They will see how absenteeism varies across students and timeframes, identify contributing factors, how existing policies and supports address (and don't address) attendance challenges, and how stakeholders define success in reducing absenteeism. 

Every school has an attendance team that meets weekly, and there is a weekly district-level team that pulls data for students who are at risk for attendance problems, Stokes reported, as well as community partnerships. 

Chair William Cameron said this almost has to be looked at student-by-student.  He commended this as an important study, recognizing that it will take a lot of work. 

"I don't think there's a reason they don't [attend school.] I think there are 100 reasons," he said. 

"Every student may have a different reason based on their own experience in school, out of school, and so to try to figure out a strategy for improving attendance, I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all strategy here. I think this is a great project to work on, but it is going to be labor-intensive." 

Phillips said it is also important to look at attendance by grade level. 

"Because at the elementary level, you're relying heavily on the parent transporting the students, so we need to understand where is the challenge there. Middle and high, there's much more independence," she said, explaining that there could be patterns within the different age levels. 

Cameron added that students who stop going to school regularly around 6 or 7 years old are "much more likely to run into all kinds of problems, including attendance issues, as they get older." The problem, he said, is that the issue spans across the entire district.

He stressed the importance of acclimating students in the lower grades. 

PPS Absenteeism by Brittany Polito


Tags: absenteeism,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories