Clarksburg Announces Open Seats, Dates for 2026 Town Election

Print Story | Email Story

CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The town released the official calendar and list of vacancies for the upcoming 2026 municipal elections, inviting residents to consider local primary leadership roles.

Open Positions

Six town boards have openings this cycle, with terms ranging from three to five years:

  • Select Board: One seat (3-year term)

  • School Committee: One seat (3-year term)

  • Library Trustee: One seat (3-year term)

  • Board of Health: One seat (3-year term)

  • War Memorial: One seat (3-year term)

  • Planning Board: One seat (5-year term)

Key Election Deadlines

The election process officially begins in early February. Prospective candidates and voters should note the following dates:

  • Feb. 3: Nomination papers become available at the Town Clerk’s Office.

  • March 25: Deadline for candidates to submit nomination papers.

  • April 10: Final day for candidates to withdraw from the ballot.

  • May 2: Last day for residents to register to vote (8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.).

  • May 12: Election Day. Polls will be open from noon to 7:00 p.m.

Financial Reporting

Candidates are reminded of their obligations regarding campaign finance documentation. The pre-election report is due by May 4, followed by a final report on June 11. All elected officials must also file a year-end report by Jan. 20, 2027.

Interested residents are encouraged to visit the Town Clerk’s Office for further information on candidate requirements and the nomination process.


Tags: election,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Clarksburg Stories