Lanesborough Planners Try to Keep Up With Bylaw Readings

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board got an earful last week on the Planning Board's efforts to deal with short-term rentals. 
 
Planning Board Vice Chair Joe Trybus asked at the meeting if they knew that short-term rentals weren't allowed to operate in Lanesborough.
 
"I would like to know who actually knew that short-term rentals were not allowed," he said. "I even asked, you know anybody here? Because I gotta tell you something, the only reason it was discussed was to regulate them in some way, not that they weren't allowed. We all thought they were allowed."
 
Select Board member Michael Murphy said the building inspector knew and brought it to their attention.
 
"Didn't bring it to mine," responded Trybus. "You know who brought it to my attention? To be honest, it was the gentleman that owns the coffee shop. I stopped in to see how the business was. Had a cup of coffee, and honestly, it was a really good cup of coffee. And the guy got my ear. He didn't know who I was, and he said that he was getting bullied from the town."
 
The building inspector issued a cease-and-desist order to Second Drop Farm in January to shut down the short-term rental it was operating, saying it was not allowed. The farm's attorney argued that the town's bylaws recognize STRs through restrictions on parking and through taxation but the Zoning Board of Appeals upheld the violation. 
 
 
Trybus said the planners at their Feb. 17 discussed making changes to the bylaws that could be voted at the town's annual meeting. 
 
"Short-term rentals is defined as 31 days or less. That's how we're going to do it. It's not 30, it's 31 OK, a registration and inspection was tabled until the next meeting," he said. "There's a little bit of arguing going on between the board to come up with a solution for that one."
 
The board tabled the discussion on inspection and registration until the March meeting but had talked about fees.
 
"So somebody comes in, registers into town, whatever paperwork we're going to have in place for that is probably like registering a business," said Trybus. "You come in, you sign your name. I don't even think there's a fee for it or we could decide that there's a $20 fee or $100 fee. I don't know when that happens. And one of the board members said, we can just make that in addition to permitize therefore the inspector gets zapped right away, and then he has to go out and do an inspection."
 
The board had also tabled ownership and entity limits but had agreed on a cap on how many days a unit could be rented out during year.
 
"Again, the board argued this a little bit, but it was voted they're allowed 365 days. I think that's a win, just my opinion," Trybus said.
 
The board had also moved forward a draft of parking restrictions, stating off-street parking is required with at least two parking spaces or, if there are three bedrooms, three parking spaces.
 
The Planning Board had also tabled a discussion on accessory dwelling units (ADU) to be used as STRs until the next meeting.
 
Murphy expressed admiration for how the Planning Board had handled those conversations.
 
"I want to commend you and the rest of that board for having — a I know it's just starting — but a thoughtful conversation," he said. "If you haven't watched that Planning Board meeting, I highly recommend you watch every minute of it to see what this board has gone through."
 
Trybus encouraged officials to speak with town residents to get some turnout at town meeting, saying too often "It's the same faces."
 
Murphy noted there were only 98 people at the last town meeting who voted.
 
"So if the townspeople, and I hope they're watching, if you really want short-term rentals in Lanesborough, you better go vote," Trybus said.
 
Trybus also discussed signage with the board, saying he didn't understand why the Country Store wouldn't have taken the small sign down if only one is allowed.
 
Murphy thought it was because there are other businesses in the location.
 
Trybus said he personally didn't feel there was anything wrong with the signage and Select Board member Jason Breault said the town should be working harder to promote more business and that over-restricting signage may hurt businesses.
 
The sign installed in the bed of the Lanesborough Local Country Store was found to be in violation, a finding also upheld by the ZBA and which is the subject of a lawsuit against the town. 
 
Trybus said he will plan to bring up the idea for two signs at 50 square feet per business instead of one to the Planning Board and will also look to see what the public says.
 
"If you want bigger signs and more of them, I can try to get the whole Planning Board to agree to write something up like that and bring it to the annual town meeting, and you can see what your public says," he said. "Because, again, it's not us. We can only bring it to them. We can only bring it to the people, and we'll let them decide."
 

Tags: Planning Board,   short-term rentals,   signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Reviews Public Safety Budget, Keeps SpotShotter

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — On the fourth day of budget deliberations, the City Council preliminarily approved public safety and public service budgets. 

See the first two days of budget review here; and the third day here.

Councilors deliberated the Pittsfield Police Department's $16,439,421 spending plan for more than 90 minutes. Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren unsuccessfully motioned to cut $220,000 for ShotSpotter services. 

He said the acoustic gunshot detection technology is not well used throughout the country, citing other communities that have opted out or are exploring it. 

Pittsfield has two more years on its contract; while councilors voted down the budget reduction several were willing to explore the impact data and see if those funds could be used elsewhere. 

Police Chief Marc Maddalena reported that there has been a significant decrease in shots fired calls, and attributed it to the surveillance technology assisting enforcement. He said it also comes in faster than 911 calls. 

"If people know that just by that noise alone that we're responding within seconds, that's preventing them from utilizing that weapon," he said. 

"So that in of itself is saving lives." 

It has an about 20 percent accuracy rate, and police respond to every activation. 

On Sunday, at least two homes in the area of Memorial Drive and Doyle Drive were struck by gunfire and investigators located 17 shell casings on scene. This was brought up during conversation; it was reported that there were 13 impulses on ShotSpotter during the incident. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories