image description
A petition is asking the Traffic Commission to limit large truck traffic from using Appleton Avenue to turn onto East Housatonic Street in Pittsfield.

Pittsfield Considers Heavy Vehicle Exclusion on Appleton Ave.

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Heavy commercial vehicles might be banned from driving on Appleton Avenue from East Street to East Housatonic Street in the future. 

On Thursday, the Traffic Commission fielded a petition from Ward 4 Councilor James Conant requesting an exclusion for large commercial trucks on the route, which runs next to Pittsfield High School and through a residential neighborhood. 

City Engineer Tyler Shedd explained that the city would have to conduct a traffic study first. He agreed to have that data collected by summertime, and the petition was referred to his office. The exclusion would also have be OKed by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. 

"I think it's something where maybe we can discuss it here, because trucks are trying to avoid the corner of South and West Housatonic Street, which had barriers for years, and then we put a bump out there," Shedd said. 

"There's a designated truck route that just doesn't get followed, and there's been attempts at improving signage." 

He said the concern is trucks turning from Appleton Avenue to East Housatonic Street without enough room. This often means cars have to get out of the way or run a red light. 

In 2022, the commission approved a petition to exclude heavy commercial vehicles on Deming and East Housatonic Streets. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed to previous years' efforts to exclude heavy commercial trucks from the area. 

"I don't disagree with [Conant] at all," he said. 

"I think that we should have done it on East Housatonic, too, but we just haven't, and I assume the reason was something either with state law or with you, because other councils have requested it." 



The requirements for an exclusion, Shedd explained, are that there is a significant number of trucks, at least 5 percent, and that the detour is not a burden. 

Kavey reported speaking to a truck driver who said they look at the GPS instead of the signs on routes. He reached out to two GPS companies on the issue, and only heard back from one. 

Appleton Avenue has also been the focus of safety concerns for students leaving PHS.

At the first meeting of the new School Committee early this year, resident Brenda Coddington raised concerns about traffic on Appleton Avenue when students are released from PHS. She has consistently returned to the open microphone stand, most recently asking for an update on crossing guards. 

Coddington said she was hit by another vehicle while waiting to pick up her granddaughter on the street just before Christmas, and that if it had been two minutes later, her granddaughter would have gotten hit while getting in the car. 

The commission also heard an update on efforts to make the intersection of Linden and Onota Streets more comfortable for drivers. A petition from Joseph Cimini to redesign the intersection of Linden Street at Onota Street was filed because the city is already working on it. 

Shedd reported that Pittsfield is working on softening the northeast corner of the intersection, reducing it by two feet. 

"Right now it's just not comfortable to drive through, like it can be done, but we should make it a little bit more comfortable, basically," he said. 

"The idea is that we're going to take at least two feet from where the curb is now on the Onota side." 


Tags: intersection,   traffic commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Rejects Federal Police Drone Grant

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday rejected a $31,000 police drone grant after a larger conversation about surveillance and responsible data storage. 

On the agenda was $31,167 from the Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. For about two hours, councilors dug into the U.S. Department of Justice contract, found grammatical errors, and what they described as abnormally worded conditions and red flags. 

"It's not even like one red flag. It's like a whole field of red flags," Ward 7 Councilor Kathy Moody said.

They voted 9-2 to reject the grant, with only Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren and Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn in favor.  

"We should not approve a grant where the contract goes against our own policies, whether it be state or local policies, or whether the requirements in that contract go against our community's values," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"And what I heard from residents before this meeting, and what was a concern that I flagged when I first read this, is that it does go against my values and the values of our neighbors and us wanting to protect people." 

Open microphone speakers said provisions in the contract violate the Massachusetts PROTECT Act, which Gov. Maura Healey signed last month to establish statewide limits on state and local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement. 

"I'm particularly concerned about Condition 53, that would essentially require police officers to report to [the Department of Homeland Security] anyone who is being released from custody from a correctional facility, which would include local jails," resident Kamaar Taliaferro said. 

"Condition 54. This condition is in direct violation of the PROTECT Act." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories