image description
The replacement for Crosby Elementary School, above, and Conte Community School is likely five years away.

New West Side Pittsfield School Five Years Out

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— A new consolidated elementary school in the West Side would not open for at least five years, officials say. 

On Tuesday, the School Building Needs Commission heard an update from the owner's project manager, Skanska, and endorsed a draft schedule that runs from 2026 to 2032. 

"I want to be clear that this timeline means that the earliest we would be opening the building would be school year 2031-2032," interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips said. 

"So we would have five school years leading up to the doors opening."

Co-Chair Frank LaRagione explained they are making this the baseline schedule, "Not meaning it can't change, but at least this is the base that we're going to work from going forward." 

School officials in 2024 toured the 69,500-square-foot Silvio O. Conte Community School, which opened in 1974, and the 69,800-square-foot John C. Crosby Elementary School, which opened in 1962. At Conte, they saw an open-concept community school that is not conducive to modern-day needs, and at Crosby, they saw a facility that was built as a middle school and in need of significant repair.

The district is seeking up to 80 percent reimbursement from the Massachusetts School Building Authority for a combined and consolidated school on West Street. 

Skanska Program Manager Nick Lobik reported that they are working to start a feasibility study in September. This phase includes submissions to the MSBA for the preliminary design program in February, and later a preferred schematic report. 


There will be a minimum of seven options with cost estimates to consider, and those will go through an educational visioning process and community meetings. The preferred schematic report will further narrow down the options until one is selected to proceed to schematic design. 

The School Committee will need to determine the enrollment before the schematic design phase, which means deciding if Stearns will be included in the building. 

When reviewing a map that roughly estimates the attendance zones last year, concern arose when it was observed that Stearns Elementary, on Lebanon Avenue, is an outlier and would be absorbed into the new building.

The district then clarified with the MSBA that Stearns isn't included in the plans, but could be explored. 

From the preferred schematic report, the School Building Needs Commission and School Committee select one option to move forward, and it will go before the MSBA's Facilities Assessment Committee in the summer of 2027. 

Following this, the construction budget is finalized along with all soft costs such as designer fees and furniture.  After another approval from the MSBA, the city receives a project scope and budget agreement. 

The budget agreement is estimated to happen in the spring of 2028, with the expectation of construction beginning in the summer of 2029.  Students would be in the building for the 2031-2032 academic year under this timeline. 

Last month, the SBNC created a designer selection committee to guide the next actions.  It was suggested that they meet in July to review designer submissions. 


Tags: Crosby/Conte project,   school building committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories