DALTON, Mass. — It's time for voters to decide if they want to permit mobile accessory dwelling units in town and a special town meeting has been set to do just that.
For more than two years, Amy Turnbull has been advocating to amend the town's current bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes but has met obstacles delaying the effort.
Turnbull initially presented this item at the annual town meeting but it was "tabled" so a public hearing could be held.
Like many meetings before, this hearing resulted in little movement as the Planning Board decided to neither support or oppose the proposed bylaw.
During the signing of the warrant, Select Board member John Boyle expressed his hesitation about placing this item on a special town meeting warrant, citing historically low attendance at such meetings.
"It's very important and going to be a very controversial thing … Important issues should be at an annual town meeting," he said.
The town has a legal obligation to put this on the town meeting warrant, Town Manager Eric Anderson and fellow board members said.
"The applicant has put in much time and effort over the years, and I don't think the applicant should be denied her right in public meeting," Select Board member Antonio "Tony" Pagliarulo said.
The Planning Board didn't raise any concerns by deciding to neither oppose or support the item, he said, adding that he wished they had taken a vote but, "It's their prerogative they chose not to."
"The planning board ignored it, Boyle said.
This is our job to put it in the voter's hands and hopefully enough people will get out and vote, Chair Robert Bishop said.
The item, listed as Article 5 and 6, on the warrant, would make the structures allowed by special permit, subject to specific requirements.
Article 5 amends the town's bylaws to include the definition of a movable tiny home as "a transportable structure built on a chassis designed for year-round living."
The article outlines that to qualify for a special permit, the unit has to meet the following conditions:
requires site plan review,
is licensed and registered with the local Registry of Motor Vehicles,
meets the American National Standards Institute A119.5 or National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements,
is certified by a manufacturer or third-party inspector for ANSI or NFPA compliance and
the International Residential Code Appendix Q;
cannot move under its own power,
the undercarriage (wheels, axles, tongue and hitch) shall be hidden from view,
is secured by ground anchors that meet weight and height requirements
must sit on a level gravel or paved surface.
The bylaw amendment goes on to say the structure must be served by an approved energy and water source and wastewater system and have no less than 150 square feet of habitable living space and no more than 400 square feet.
This maximum size restriction is excluding lofts, projections from bay windows, open desks, porches or exterior utility and storage compartments.
The bylaw requires that the unit be designed and built using conventional residential building materials to any single- or two-family dwelling.
Article 6, would amend the town's Accessory Dwelling Unit bylaws to add "a movable tiny house" to the definitions following "a unit that is part of an accessory structure," and before "or a unit that is part of an expanded or remodeled primary dwelling."
During the Select Board meeting, Turnbull requested two amendments to the articles. For Article 5, she requested that "requires site plan review" and "and the International Residential Code Appendix Q" be removed.
"The first strike-through is to correct that placement of where the special permit should be," she said.
The special permit is in the wrong place, it's a definition, and under state law, definitions are not supposed to contain a "use," Turnbull said.
She explained that, as she understands it, site plan review is already included in the special permit process, enabling town officials to ensure compliance with required standards, so shouldn't be included in the definitions.
"And the second strike-through is a means of letting the inspection of a tiny house remain with ANSI or NFPA certification either by a manufacturer or a third-party inspector."
Turnbull explained that she has sent Building Inspector Brian Duval an agency, National Organization of Alternative Housing (NOAH), which uses a combination of ANSI and state code, and likely Appendix Q.
"So, I didn't want to dirty the waters," she said.
The Select Board agreed not to make these amendments because it had not been reviewed by an attorney and said these changes can be made with a motion at the special town meeting.
Article 1 is requesting voters authorize amending the vote taken on Article 3 for the May 4, 2026 Annual Town Meeting allowing the town to increase or decrease funding for one or more departments for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026.
Article 2 requests voters establish a line item for the Clean Air Committee. Subsequently, Article 3, transfers the available funds, that were appropriated at previous town meetings, into the new account.
Lastly, Article 4 requests voters transfer a sum of money, not yet provided, from the Capital Stabilization Fund to cover costs to the DPW's roof repair project that exceed borrowing.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Pittsfield Committee Recommends Scanlon for City Audit
By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires.com
PITTSFIELD, Mass.— After the bid for a new auditing company came back more than 30 percent higher, Pittsfield will stick with Scanlon and Associates.
On Tuesday, the Auditing Services Evaluation Committee voted, 4-2, to advance Scanlon to the City Council for an independent audit. CliftonLarsonAllen also responded to the bid, but came in costing $120,000 more.
“I have to go with saving money for the city. I mean, the discrepancy is too much of a difference,” committee member Karen Kalinowsky said.
“The city could have used for that difference over the next three years.”
This process was prompted by Rule 40 of the council rules and the City Charter, where in any year the City Council votes to hold a procurement process for an independent certified public accountant or firm to audit Pittsfield's books and accounts, the city must, through its Finance Committee with the assistance of the purchasing department, solicit requests for proposals or invitations for bids before June 1.
The council in March recommended that the purchasing agent draft a request for proposals and put it out to bid.
Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, who has vocally supported the independent audit for years, said the city doesn’t have to follow a bidding process for the professional service, “We are doing this so the public knows that we're being professional and are looking for other options, looking at what the best options are, and comparing them based on what they can offer and what the cost is.”
Board member Kathy Amuso said both CLA and Scanlon have comparable reviews with high recommendations. Especially considering the budget crisis Pittsfield is in, she moved to recommend Scanlon to the full council.
The district will test air and water quality at Pittsfield High School as it prepares to request funding for "in need but not dire" renovations. click for more
Earlier this month, the Select Board voted to request that the state conduct a traffic study of the area and provide recommendations for potential safety improvements.
click for more
You may notice a different look to the former Iztac Mexican Restaurant — the brightly colored front entrance has given way to a more subdued, moody facade. click for more