image description
Patrick Muraca, seen in this file photo, is accused of using investor money on personal expenses.

Biotech Company Head Muraca Facing Fraud Charges

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Nuclea Biotechnologies' former chief executive Patrick Muraca is accused of misusing investor funds for his new startup company. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI arrested Muraca on Tuesday morning on a wire fraud charge.
 
On Monday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in federal court accusing Muraca of using funds from investors for NanoMolecularDX, a new company Muraca started in Lee, to fund personal expenses, including his fiancée's restaurant business. 
 
"Muraca has raised at least $1,175,000 from at least 15 investors for purported investment in Nano and Metabo, which he describes as pharmaceutical development companies. Muraca represented to investors that their funds would be used to manufacture and commercialize cancer diagnostic tests and other biopharmaceutical innovations, to purchase assets related to such products, and to develop clinical trials," reads the SEC filing. 
 
"In actuality, Muraca diverted a substantial portion of the money raised from investors to his own personal use. In some instances, Muraca caused investors to deposit funds directly into Muraca's personal bank account. In other instances, Muraca removed investor funds from the business bank accounts of Nano and Metabo, transferring the funds to his personal accounts or directly paying personal expenses from the business accounts. Muraca has been misappropriating investors' money in order, among other things, to pay for routine groceries, restaurants, entertainment, and to subsidize his fiancée's restaurant business.
 
"From April 2016 to the present, Muraca has spent at least $400,000 of investor funds for purposes unrelated to the pharmaceutical development businesses of Nano and Metabo. Muraca has diverted investor money from the Nano and Metabo bank accounts, as well as investor money that was deposited to Muraca's personal bank account."
 
The court agreed to freeze Muraca's assets. 
 
"As alleged in our complaint, we're intervening to protect investors because Muraca has veered from his stated intentions and has been using their money for purposes other than the fight against cancer and other diseases," said Paul Levenson, director of the SEC's Boston regional office, in a statement released on Monday.
 
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York also filed criminal charges relating to the case on Tuesday.
 
Joon Kim, acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and William Sweeney Jr., assistant director of the New York field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, allege that Muraca engaged in wire fraud. Muraca was arrested Tuesday morning and expected to be arraigned in federal court in Springfield. The charges are related to the SEC's claims of defrauding investors.
 
Kim said, "Patrick Muraca promised investors their money would be used to expand his businesses, but as alleged, he instead used those funds to line his pockets. Thanks to the investigative work of the FBI, Muraca must now answer for his fraud."
 
The single count of wire fraud carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.
 
Tuesday afternoon, Muraca's attorney Anthony Doyle released a statement saying he is reviewing the case and is "confident" that a "very different set of facts will emerge."
 
"The charges brought against Patrick Muraca by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York are serious and we are responding accordingly. We are reviewing the complaint brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and feel confident that when we have the opportunity to present our case that a very different set of facts will emerge," Doyle wrote.
 
"Mr. Muraca takes his fiduciary responsibilities seriously and we look forward to the swift resolution of this matter. Until we have more information about both the criminal charges filed in New York and the complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we will reserve further comment."
 
The 48-year-old Muraca lives in Pittsfield and was most known for founding Nuclea Biotechnologies. Muraca left Nuclea in 2015 but remained a shareholder. That is when he first started to open NanoDX, which was tied in with the Start Up New York program in Albany. But that didn't take off.
 
In August 2016, Nuclea filed for bankruptcy. The company had been highly touted when it was up in running in Pittsfield, with the governor visiting and praising the work it was doing.
 
But, by 2016, the company shut down its Pittsfield operations and leaving unpaid bills in its wake. Through the bankruptcy proceedings, Muraca purchased the assets of Nuclea for $330,000 for his new company NanoMolecularDX in Lee and it was seen as a restart to what was left behind when he left Nuclea. 
 
The companies were touted as doing research and development for cancer diagnostics. Muraca was the president and CEO of NanoMolecular DC and MetaboRX,  the two companies he founded in the post-Nuclea era. 
 
The SEC says in April 2016, Muraca had begun soliciting investors for the two companies and continued until as recently as the end of June. According to the complaint, "at least fifteen individuals invested in Nano and Metabo between April 2016 and the present and Muraca provided many of these individuals with investment confirmations listing the number of shares in each company that they were entitled to as a result of their investment."
 
The investors came from all over the country, including New York City, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Arizona, and the state of Florida. 
 
"On various occasions between 2016 and 2017, Muraca represented to shareholders of Nano and Metabo and prospective investors in each company that their funds would be used for pharmaceutical development and commercialization. He repeatedly sent shareholder updates and solicitations detailing the purported pharmaceutical business operations," the complaint reads. 
 
"In these updates, Muraca described in detail the purported uses to which investor proceeds were being applied in connection with the pharmaceutical business. In making such representations, Muraca omitted to disclose to his investors that their funds had been used, and would be used on an ongoing basis, to pay his personal expenses and to fund business activities unrelated to pharmaceutical development, such as his fiancée's restaurant business," the complaint reads. 
 
On March 31, 2017, Muraca allegedly filed an application as a foreign LLC, or limited liability corporation, for Nano stating that the business's purpose was "serving food, restaurant." On April 24, 2017 Muraca allegedly emailed investors saying the MetaboRX "is a preclinical stage biopharmaceuticals enterprise based on pioneering research in fatty acid metabolism" and that the company "has made major strides in the development of new diagnostics and is starting to build real value for our shareholders."
 
But, that email fails to mention the registration of a business with the purpose of "serving food; restaurant," the SEC alleges. On June 30, 2017, Muraca continued to solicit investments in his companies and an individual invested $80,000 into the Nano bank account, the complaint reads.
 
"In his various oral and written representations to investors and prospective investors, or in any other communications with investors or prospective investors, Muraca omitted to disclose that their investments had been, and on an ongoing basis would be, used to pay for his own personal expenses, to pay for a food service or restaurant business, or to fund businesses related to Nano or Metabo's purported pharmaceutical development activities," the complaint reads.
 
The SEC says Muraca instructed some investors to wire more than $65,000 into his personal bank account and then used those funds for personal expenses such as "his mortgage and expenses for family members and his fiancée."
 
"Muraca repeatedly took money from those accounts, writing checks payable to himself and to friends and family, and paying his personal expenses, such as grocery store purchases, a luxury goods purchase, and automotive shop purchases, with debit cards for the business accounts; and, Muraca used at least $65,000 of investor funds from the Nano and Metabo business bank accounts to directly pay for expenses related to his fiancée's restaurant businesses," the complaint reads.
 
Muraca is accused of not only funding his fiancée's business and personal expenses, but also payments to a casino. The SEC complaints tracks the accounts, deposits and withdrawals, over several months.
 
By January, one account was overdrawn and Muraca sought out more investments. Shortly after receiving more funds, Muraca allegedly continued to write checks to himself, his mother, and for his fiancée's restaurant.
 
"Muraca engaged in a similar pattern with respect to the Metabo bank account, which was opened in January of 2017 with a $10 balance. On Jan. 25, 2017, Investor #6 wired $50,000 to the Metabo bank account. On January 26 and 27, 2016, Investor #7 wired $50,000 to the Metabo bank account. There were no other credits to the Metabo bank account. Of the $100,000 in investor funds deposited into the Metabo bank account on or about those dates, Muraca transferred over $22,000 to himself via checks from the account payable to 'Patrick Muraca,' and spent over $29,000 directly from the Metabo bank account for personal expenses, including a $15,000 security deposit for a lease to the premises of his fiancée's new restaurant," the complaint reads.
 
Muraca's fiancée was the owner of a restaurant in Lee and the SEC says more than $45,000 of investor money from the two accounts went to support it. The restaurant closed on Jan. 29 and investor funds were allegedly used to start up another restaurant in Lenox. 
 
"In January 2017, Muraca and his fiancée signed a three-year lease agreement for a restaurant location in Lenox, which required a $15,000 security deposit and called for $2,000 per month rent. On March 31, 2017, Muraca paid $15,000 directly out of the Metabo bank account to the landlord of the Lenox restaurant. Muraca then wrote a check for $2,000 from the Metabo bank account for the April 2017 rent at the location," the complaint reads.

 

SEC Charges Against Patrick Muraca by iBerkshires.com on Scribd

 


Tags: FBI,   fraud,   startup,   U.S. Attorney,   US Court,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories