@theMarket: What Will Resumption of Economic Data Mean for Markets?
By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
After six weeks, the macroeconomic data that disappeared during the shutdown will begin to flow once more. The question Wall Street is asking is, will it be good, bad, or indifferent for the markets?
Readers should pay attention to the slew of expected government reports that are expected to be released this coming week. The Consumer and Producer Price Indexes, average hourly earnings, average weekly earnings, factory orders, durable goods, retail sales, housing starts, building permits, and the most important number of all, the non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, are expected to be announced on Friday. The markets are worried.
The NFP report will be critical. Investors believe that the Federal Reserve Bank will base its decision on whether to cut interest rates again at its Dec. 10 meeting on the state of the job market. Given that missing October inflation and jobs data may never be reported, according to the White House, it leaves the markets hanging and elevates the importance of the coming deluge of data.
At present, the Federal Open Market Committee is a hung jury, split roughly down the middle between voting members who want another rate cut and those who don't. The betting markets have dropped their view of a December rate cut from almost a sure thing to a little below 50/50.
The stock market has yet to discount those lower odds but is in the process of doing that right now. The Fed has made it clear that the health of the jobs market is just as crucial as reigning in inflation, if not more so. If the number of jobs continues to rise, that will give the Fed a reason to stand down and wait. The bulls are hoping to see some job losses, but not too many, just enough to reduce rates by another quarter point.
The bears contend that employment is dropping like a stone, and the numbers will prove it. They argue the Fed will need to cut by 50 basis points. Why would that be bearish for stocks? Because it could mean that a sharp decline in job growth would indicate the economy is rolling over. That would panic the markets. Oh, the webs we weave.
As readers surely know by now, the government shutdown is over, at least until Jan. 31. Then we get to do this all over again. If it were to happen again, markets, which had basically ignored the drama in Congress, might not be as understanding the second time around. What was the point of this one? Let me know if you figure it out. Otherwise, the country has lost billions of dollars or more in growth with nothing to show for it.
My own forecasts indicate that we will see less inflation over the next 2-3 months. While economic growth will moderate, it will not lead to a recession. Employment should decline somewhat. This is due to the ongoing labor disruption caused by the president's immigration policies and the displacement of jobs by AI. If I am right, the chances of another Fed cut are higher than the market anticipates.
On a side note, the CPI basket of items has been pared back under both the Biden and Trump administrations. The government has removed some of the worst inflationary components, including meat, coffee, new cars, trucks, and motorcycles, as well as long-term care and vehicle insurance, electricity, natural gas, and energy services. Given this list of excluded items, it is a mystery why anyone really believes that the CPI accurately reflects inflation.
Did you notice that the Trump administration is rolling back tariffs on beef, coffee, and bananas? I have been writing about how Trump tariffs are not only a tax but a tax on the food we eat, among other things. Donald Trump, his Treasury Secretary, and most Republican members of Congress have denied this, claiming that tariffs are not the cause of higher prices — until now.
Finally, the truth is coming out. Trump recently acknowledged that U.S. consumers are "paying something" for his tariffs. Don't look for him to admit the truth on his tariff taxes, especially in front of a Supreme Court decision on that subject.
In my last column, I mentioned that investors were worried that the AI boom in stocks had reached a peak. This week, we see the results of that narrative. AI darlings have led the decline, taking the rest of the market with them. Remember these two key points: the markets will remain volatile, and I expect a 4 to 6 percent decline in the averages.
This coming week, we also have the AI King of Kings, Nvidia, reporting earnings on Wednesday. At this juncture, where Nvidia goes, the market follows. Remember, do not think "down" when I use that word. Volatility cuts both ways, and given the global flows of money, that means both big up and big down moves. Strap in, stay invested, and hold off on buying dips for now.
Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.
Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.
@theMarket: November Profit-taking Surprise
By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
It wasn't supposed to happen this way. Historically, November and December have been considered the best months of the year for stocks. The problem is that history has been turned upside down this year.
Take the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case on tariffs that have not been this high for 100 years. And then there are the lofty valuations of companies that are investing trillions of dollars in artificial intelligence. Many investors believe AI will usher in a new age for the world. And in case that doesn't convince you, the sudden weakening in private jobs for October was the lowest in years. That may not qualify as history, but the present administration's immigration policy and its impact on employment certainly do.
Now, some might argue that a decline would be beneficial for markets, as this melt-up in the averages has persisted for weeks. It has been so long since we have had more than a one- or two-day decline that most investors are conditioned to buy any dip, no matter how shallow.
But why now, you might ask. Perhaps because markets didn't decline as expected in September and October. Then there is the "what-if" scenario surrounding one of the lynch pins of Donald Trump's economic policy. "What if" the court rules against him? "What if" the government is forced to refund billions of dollars in collected tariffs? And if so, what will happen to the deficit that has been declining?
If you believe the president, who claims an adverse ruling on his tariffs could "literally destroy the United States," then you are most likely one of those who sold stocks this week. I suggest you read my latest column, "Trump's tariffs and the holidays," for my thoughts on any fallout from this court case.
Thanks to the continued government shutdown, which has now become the longest in history, the dearth of government data has forced markets to focus instead on private sector research data. One such data point released this week was from global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. It showed that last month was the worst October for layoffs announcements since 2003.
In the absence of the non-farm payroll data, which was scheduled to be released on Friday but wasn't, investors took the weak employment numbers at face value. Investors worry that, given the weakness was among existing job holders, rather than the absence of immigrants (legal or otherwise) seeking jobs, economic growth overall may be slowing.
At the same time, however, another service, ADP Private Payrolls, said the number of jobs added grew by 42,000 last month. The jobs were gained in the old economy, specifically in trade, transportation, and utilities. Great news for some, but none of those jobs came from AI-related industries.
Why is this important? Trillions of dollars are being invested in AI each year, including this year, last year, and the year before. This is the area that the market agrees will become a primary driver of economic growth in the future, starting now. Instead, information services and professional and business services lost jobs in an industry that should be hiring like crazy in these early stages of build-out.
More than 85 percent of companies that have reported quarterly results have beaten estimates; however, there is a catch. I had thought that these stellar earnings results would support markets. They have to some extent, but something is changing. Many of the AI names have declined after their earnings results were released.
That is a new behavior. In the past, traders have been buying AI stocks regardless of the company's earnings, whether good, bad, or indifferent. Investors are now questioning the sustainability of the AI boom and the ability of companies to justify their high valuations based on profit growth.
I half suspect that consumer holiday spending was front-loaded this year to avoid tariff-induced price hikes. If so, flat spending may not be taken kindly after years of increased end-of-year sales. Combine that with the AI valuation fears, tariff court case, and the government shutdown, and this wall of worry has grown too high for the average investor.
And even though the government shutdown continues, I maintain that it will be resolved sometime this month. Due to the increasing air travel fubar brought on by the shutdown, starting today, the FAA will cut 10% of flights at the 40 biggest airports as it prepares for a worst-case scenario of delays and canceled flights. Until now, most Americans have not been unduly affected by the shutdown. As Thanksgiving approaches, the holiday flight schedules will become far more critical to the nation. I expect irate calls to Congressional representative offices are climbing by the minute.
Marketwise, this pullback is a good thing. I have written several times in the last month that we needed a break from the relentless climb that has created an extremely worrisome condition in the markets. Hopefully, we will see a 5-6% decline in the averages, which will prepare us for a year-end rally.
Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.
Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.
@theMarket: Markets Choppy on Good News
By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
It was a classic case of "buy the rumor, sell the news." Even though the Fed did cut interest rates again and a deal between China and the U.S. was announced, investors failed to celebrate.
Markets were bid up in anticipation of these events long before they happened. A Fed cut has been in the works for approximately a month. Expectations that the two largest economies in the world would reach a satisfactory arrangement were also well telegraphed as early as last week. On Sunday, Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, all but said the deal is in the bag.
However, investors did not get all they wanted in either case. Markets had already priced in another rate cut in December with an 87 percent probability. And then came the comments by Fed Chair Jerome Powell in the Q&A session after the FOMC meeting. "A further reduction in the policy rate at our December meeting is not a foregone conclusion — far from it. Policy is not on a preset course."
Oops, said the markets. By the close on Wednesday, the chance of a cut dropped to roughly 60 percent and markets opened lower on Thursday as a result. It also didn't help that two of the largest tech stocks in the universe, Microsoft and Meta, disappointed investors, causing a loss of over 1 percent in the NASDAQ.
And then there was the deal between Presidents Trump and Xi on Thursday. The two leaders agreed to roll back a bunch of trade barriers that had never been implemented. These tit-for-tat, double-dare threats between the two nations ultimately proved to be just that. The sweeping controls on rare-earth magnets and draconian restrictions on Chinese companies disappeared like hot air, at least for the next year. However, there was some good news for soybean farmers (including Scott Bessent) as China will resume purchases.
The administration and the media hailed the latest truce as groundbreaking, but I don't see it. No agreements were committed to paper, so there is no legal binding on anything. Their fundamental differences over Taiwan, technological supremacy, and national security were not even mentioned.
To me, this so-called framework allows both leaders a win. Beijing gets to continue stringing things along, buying itself even more time to mitigate any potential downside of U.S. actions against it. Evidently, the markets agreed, as both Chinese and American stocks fell after the announcements.
The shutdown continues. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits cease at the end of Friday, impacting one out of eight Americans. Saturday marks the start of the open enrollment period for health-care programs under the Affordable Care Act. Look for numerous stories next week about the higher premiums for insurance that many of the 24.3 million on the ACA will need to pay.
The president, suddenly appearing concerned over the shutdown, posted that it is time to eliminate the Senate filibuster, stating, "The choice is clear — initiate the nuclear option." There has been a slight thawing of the congressional ice jam, but make no mistake, it is not about those issues.
The facts are, as I have said in the past, November marks a period leading up to Thanksgiving when air traffic increases. Air traffic controllers have not been paid. Newark already shut down for a day this week due to a lack of personnel in the tower. This is one area of the government shutdown that could generate significant blowback, as thousands of inconvenienced travelers are suddenly confronted with flight delays.
Fortunately for the markets, the earnings of Apple and Amazon beat expectations after the close on Thursday. That reversed the damage, and the markets recouped nearly all their losses only to drop gain. Strong third-quarter earnings are supporting the markets. With more than 60 percent of companies reported thus far, over 84 percent have beaten estimates by a wide margin.
Entering November, markets continue higher. The only difference that I can see is that the gains have slowed, and markets are alternating between some down and some up days. The same drivers, AI and tech, continue to lead, with a few other sectors alternating between gains and losses.
Precious metals have slowed their free-fall and are now consolidating. I suspect they could still see lower prices, so be careful. Cryptocurrencies are doing the same. Overall, I advise readers not to chase here but only add on dips like we had on Thursday (1 percent or more in the averages).
Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.
Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.
@themarket: Shutdown Lingers, But Nobody Cares
By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
As of Friday, the government's closure is the second longest on record. The country has managed thus far, since much of the government's economic machinery keeps chugging along. As such, there is no reason why it can't continue.
By Nov. 5, if no compromise takes place, Donald Trump will make history once again — this time by beating his own shutdown record of 34 days during his first term. The partisan stand-off is so severe that the House no longer even meets, while the Senate continues its own version of Groundhog Day by voting and failing to pass any legislation.
There is no real urgency either, since Social Security benefits and Medicare payments still go out. The mail continues to be delivered, student loan payments are getting collected, ports are open, so tariffs are still being charged on imports, and the U.S. Treasury is still servicing the nation's burgeoning debt. And the administration has somehow found the money to pay U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Today, Oct. 24, will mark the first missed paycheck for many federal workers. Service members were paid a week or so ago by moving funds around within the Defense Department. Americans who are dependent on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to eat have managed thus far, but these SNAP benefits will dwindle to nothing by next month.
Sure, there are disruptions. Clearly, federal workers and contractors are being affected through lost pay, work stoppages, and delayed contracts. Some economists estimate that $800 million in federal contracts is at risk each day. And we have until the Thanksgiving holiday before anyone cares about the air traffic controllers (unless, of course, there are a couple of near misses or a mid-air collision).
The GOP-controlled Congress is taking its direction from the White House, but the man in charge is too busy right now to divert his attention to opening the government. As I mentioned, the government shutdown is accomplishing much of what the administration had hoped it would. Bond yields are down, and spending has slowed considerably. His OMB chief has been able to cut several Democrat-backed billion-dollar projects, and there are fewer federal workers on the payroll.
Whether by intention or happenstance, the administration has successfully distracted investor attention from the shutdown, despite the media's insistence that it does matter. This week alone, Donald Trump has crowded out those concerns by instead focusing investors' attention on his on-again, off-again peace efforts to end the Russian/Ukraine war. His latest move, to add further oil sanctions on Russia, spiked oil prices higher by more than 5 percent.
In addition, Trump's attention was focused on shoring up last week's "done-deal" peace agreement in Gaza, which doesn't appear to be quite done yet. Then there is his escalating naval warfare on alleged drug boats off South America, his upcoming meeting with China's Xi Jinping, and lest we forget, his newest national concern. That would be a $250 million White House ballroom intended to put Europe's longest-reigning absolute monarch, Louis XIV's Palace of Versailles, to shame.
While the shutdown has left a data vacuum in government, the Consumer Price Index for September was released on Friday. It was a necessary use of available government funds, given that the CPI data is a crucial measure used by the Social Security Administration to adjust the dollar value of Social Security benefits. Wall Street forecasts called for an increase to 3.1 percent year over year. It came in at 3 percent.
Historically, shutdowns have not had a significant, lasting impact on the economy. That is because all that government spending will come back as soon as the government reopens. If some of that spending does not come back due to firings, failure to provide back pay, or spending cuts, the economy might slow for a quarter or so.
Quarterly earnings have been better than expected thus far. Analysts had expected an average growth rate of 7-8 percent. Out of 141 companies reporting on the S&P 500 Index so far, the gain has been 13.3 percent. Of the 63 companies included in that index, only nine have reported, and the growth rate was 26 percent.
This coming week, the Fed meets and is expected to cut interest rates by another one-quarter point. Trump will also meet Xi in South Korea for trade talks. The hope is that a breakthrough in trade will occur. Don't hold your breath.
If perchance U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent can cut a deal beforehand with his Chinese counterparts, markets should rally. If so, White House leaks will front-run the news. I will be watching soybean and China stocks as a tell. If his good friend Xi rebuffs his overtures, expect a little "Hell Hath No Fury like a President Scorned" action, and markets will swoon at the wrath of Trump.
Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.
Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.
@theMarket: Higher volatility reflects worries over trade deals, the shutdown, and banking credit jitters
By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
"Short-term volatility is greatest at turning points and diminishes as a trend becomes established," wrote George Soros in his book The Alchemy of Finance. Last week, I warned investors to expect volatility. We have had that in spades.
Verbal threats from both sides before the upcoming China-U.S. trade negotiations led to stocks whipsawing in both directions for most of the week. The continued government shutdown didn't help matters either, but it was two small regional banks that spooked investors most.
Concerns about credit among two regional banks, Zions Bancorp and Western Alliance, triggered an overnight sell-off on Thursday into Friday. Both companies were victims of fraud in the distressed commercial real estate market. This sparked concerns that other banks may also be victims.
In the meantime, China and the U.S. traded accusations, but don't get carried away by threats and counter-threats. It is reminiscent of Trump's first term and is all part of the positioning game ahead of the meeting between Presidents Xi and Trump at the APEC meeting in two weeks. I won't bother to regurgitate a list of the he said, they-said jawboning that had freaked-out traders booking appointments with their therapists.
Suffice it to say, most of the acrimony centered on China's near-monopoly position on strategic metals used in everything from fighter jets to cell phones. As an example, just this week, the Defense Department canceled a tender offer to purchase $500 million worth of cobalt over a five-year period. There were no bidders.
It was the first attempt to acquire this strategic metal since 1990. Cobalt is used in rechargeable batteries, magnets, and military systems. Beijing dominates cobalt processing and has built a significant stockpile. In comparison, threatening to limit our exports of cooking oil to China seems ineffective. In any case, I expect more of the same as we approach the meeting of the minds at the end of October.
The government shutdown, now the third longest in history, is dragging on with both sides digging in their heels and refusing to talk, let alone compromise. This week, we missed the most recent unemployment claims data, the Producer Price Index, and several other key macroeconomic data points. That leaves day traders in charge, with headlines providing the primary trigger for buying and selling.
Headlines like "Thousands of Treasury, HHS employees fired" got the juices flowing on the downside. "Court blocks Trump administration's latest mass layoffs" was also good for a few points on the upside.
Yes, the administration has taken advantage of the federal furloughs. The Office of Management and Budget has fired thousands of government employees. They have also transferred billions in federal funds away from what Donald Trump termed "Democrat programs" and infrastructure projects in blue states.
I had hoped the shutdown would have been over by now, given the need to ensure paychecks for the military, but Trump found funds to cover that Oct.15 deadline. The President's recent moves have bypassed Congress, raising questions about who holds the 'power of the purse' in government.
How much of these actions will survive the jurisdiction of the courts is questionable. A federal judge in San Francisco has already placed a hold on the government's firings, and many of these unilateral actions are likely to be overturned. However, the attempt to do so makes good copy for the President's base and may repair his failed attempt at cutting government headcount through the use of DOGE.
Given the sage advice of Mr. Soros, it has become abundantly clear to me that volatility is increasing at an exponential rate. From a low of 15, risk, as measured by the volatility Index (VIX), has jumped to 23.37 in less than a month. That is a 48 percent increase.
During that time, safe-haven assets like gold gained more than 16 percent, while the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond fell below 4 percent. On the other hand, Bitcoin, a leading risk asset, fell 8.8 percent. During the same period, the S&P 500 Index appears unable to surpass the 6,750 level. As the month progresses, the risk of a further pullback in the equity averages seems highly probable.
Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.
Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.
We show up at hurricanes, budget meetings, high school games, accidents, fires and community events. We show up at celebrations and tragedies and everything in between. We show up so our readers can learn about pivotal events that affect their communities and their lives.
How important is local news to you? You can support independent, unbiased journalism and help iBerkshires grow for as a little as the cost of a cup of coffee a week.
