image description
The new overlay district restricts where large battery arrays can be sited.

Pittsfield Council OKs Battery Energy Storage Regulations

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city planner says battery energy storage guidelines will protect the land and residents and councilors agree.

The City Council approved Tuesday a proposal to add a battery energy storage system overlay, or BESS, district.

City Planner Jacinta Williams said the district "seeks to protect the health, safety, and well-being of Pittsfield while allowing for responsible growth and development. ...

"Essentially, battery energy storage systems are just that. Storage systems that use batteries to store and distribute energy in the form of electricity for later use."

This provides regulatory procedures for BESS and BESS facilities, outlines the application process for site plan approval and special permit applications, specifies which districts are comparable with the use, discusses site requirements for each district where it is permitted, and requires that interested departments respond with comments and concerns within 14 days of the application.

It includes guidelines for residential-scale, small-scale, and commercial/industrial-scale BESS that fall within the boundaries of the overlay district. In the proposed ordinance, the infrastructure is not allowed in various places such as flood hazard zones, parks and open spaces, historical or indigenous land, and conservation areas.

"The overlay district that's being proposed, it is basically the industrial zoning district plus a 10th of a mile buffer zone and so if you want to know what a 10th of a mile is, that's about 528 feet or 176 yards and to answer a lot of the questions that a lot of residents have or had throughout these last couple of days, if your home has the unfortunate circumstance of being surrounded by industrial zones, which some people do, your home is protected," Williams explained.

"Let me put it this way: developers will not be able to put their large-scale battery energy storage systems next to your home. They are prohibited in residential zones and they are also prohibited from being in that tenth-of-mile buffer zone so residents are protected."

Currently, three developers are looking at parcels for BESS systems: one on Eagle's Nest Road near Kirvin Park, one on Williams Street, and another near the House of Corrections.

Williams said these are "not completely in the works" and would still have to go through the special permit process.

"But without this amendment, this developer would not have to adhere to any of the regulations that are proposed this evening. So they could put whatever they wanted there. They could do whatever they want, essentially. They don't have to have any restrictions because that part of the ordinance does not regulate very much so this is why what I'm proposing tonight is I think so essential," she cautioned.

"It's an amendment that is protecting Pittsfield's most valuable resources: its people and its land. And it's not saying 'no' to alternative energy, it's just saying 'This is how we would like to do it,' and of course, like all amendments, it's a living document. As we move forward with it and as we see how it plays out in the real world with real-world situations, we can always come back and amend it. We can always change it as the technology advances and as we learn more about how and where we'd like to see these in our community."



Commercial and industrial-scale facilities are prohibited from using ion batteries in the guidelines because of their high volatility and the heat that is generated if they are on fire.

"I have just decided that lithium-ion batteries are not allowed in the city of Pittsfield if you have a large commercial industrial scale facility," Williams said.

"They are developers, they're tech companies. As I keep telling them 'You're a tech company, innovate, figure it out.' Essentially you are allowed to come here but you are going to have to find another way to do what you're trying to do. So they are not allowed in commercial and industrial scale facilities and they are all relegated to the overlay district and the industrial zoning district."

She later explained that this was added to the document after residents came forward with concerns about this type of battery near their homes.

Berkshire Environmental Action Team Executive Director Jane Winn pointed out that lithium-ion batteries are the most popular and worry her less than fossil fuels.

"I am much more worried about natural gas explosions. I'm more worried about kids getting asthma from natural gas. I'm worried about the fact that I have CO2 detectors in my house because I have an oil furnace and it's a real risk for any of us," she said.

"So I'm less worried about lithium-ion than [Williams] is, specifically because right now that is the battery that is most commonly deployed. I agree we should be encouraging other forms of batteries but I think we ought to think carefully about banning them."

The special permit for BESS systems will be handled by the Community Development Board after being signed off by all of the appropriate departments.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III would like to see a future amendment that requires the council to make the final approval for the permit.

"I'm still going to vote for this tonight but I find it interesting in Pittsfield, you need a special permit from the City Council to put a drive-through in and you don't need one for battery storage or other things or cell phone towers," he said.

"I think it's best when we're the second process and that is because we are elected by the residents and we listen to them a lot more than other boards and commissions do at times."


Tags: battery,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories