image description
Councilor Marie Harpin, center, thought the curfew should be eliminated. Councilor Gailanne Cariddi, left, who worked on the revised ordinance, urged her colleagues not to toss it out.

North Adams Council Keeps Curfew, Changes Penalties

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Aubry Tessier, 17, told the board she and friends were frequently in violation of the curfew because of school and other activities.
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The City Council approved language to change its teen curfew from a criminal offense to civil, but hesitated at tossing out the entire ordinance at the behest of a couple councilors.

"I feel that it is supporting the police to keep this on the books," said Councilor Gailanne Cariddi. "It was obviously put on the books for a reason ... I think this is another tool in the toolbox ... I think you should be very careful about cutting things away that have been in place for many, many years."

An ordinance similar to North Adams' was struck down by the Supreme Judicial Court, prompting Cariddi to bring the matter to the council. The issue was referred to both the General Government and Public Safety committees and discussed in council at the last meeting.

Several councilors expressed concerns over the hours (11 p.m. to 5 a.m.) and age (17) in the revised curfew that could land teens working late or attending late-night films in trouble.

Aubry Tessier, 17, one of two teens speaking on behalf of the Northern Berkshire Community Coalition, said the times didn't jibe with a state law that allowed her to drive until 12:30 a.m. Plus, teens coming home from late-night activities, such as last Thursday's basketball games at the University of Massachusetts, put them in violation.

"I just feel that in a bigger city where there's more crime, more problems, this might be effective," said Tessier. "I've been out past 10 and I haven't gotten in trouble ... at this point, I probably would have a lot of fines but nothing's happened."

"Most of us didn't know there was a curfew in place," Kaitlin LaValley, 15, told the board. "I feel like for me personally, there isn't a need for it."


Councilor Alan Marden, center, thought there was no reason to keep a law not being enforced.
Councilor Alan Marden suggested the entire ordinance be abolished because it hadn't been enforced in years, according to a meeting with Public Safety Commissioner E. John Morocco.

"The only reason it's before the council is because of the court ruling," he said. "Our police have enough things to worry about than these kinds of issues. 

"I really think we ought to think twice about this before we refer it to another committee."

Councilors Keith Bona and Marie Harpin agreed, with Harpin saying it was a parental matter not a city one. "The police feel like they're baby-sitters." Bona noted that police could use the loitering ordinances that weren't based on age.

Mayor Richard Alcombright, however, disagreed.

"Shame on us if we take things off the books because they're not enforced," he said, adding that not every child has a good home. "This ordinance was specifically designed to protect our kids ... My concern is for that 14-year-old that's walking the streets, that's lonely at 2 in the morning. ...


Kaitlin LaValley, 15, said visiting a cousin down the block would break curfew.
"If we don't have enforcement that's working we need to check with enforcement and find out why it's not working."

He suggested the curfew times be referred to the soon-to-be established Youth Commission. Cariddi moved to strike the changes to times and age and retain the noncriminal penalties. That amendment passed with Marden dissenting; the updated ordinance passed to a second reading with Bona dissenting.

The changes put in place fines up to $100 and community service up to 10 hours. The age for now remains at 16 and the times at 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.

In other business:

► Trevor Gilman's appointment to the Airport Commission for a three-year term was approved. The appointment had been referred back to the mayor's office at the Feb. 23 meeting because of a clerical error in the order.

► The Windsor Lake Recreation Committee was expanded from three to five, with two seats at three years, two seats at five years and one seat at four years. Minor changes were also made in the ordinances relating to the committee.

► The Finance Committee reported that it has discussed a sewer user fee with the mayor. The committee agreed a fee would be the best way to determine usage and that property owners would have some control over usage. The mayor had requested the committee hold off on any recommendations until a five-year estimation and a report on how it might affect commercial entities be completed.

The committee also discussed the possibility of instituting a meals tax. The rooms tax adopted last year has brought in about $92,000. The adoption of the three-quarters percent meals tax, raising the total tax to 7 percent for restaurant food, could raise about $72,000. The committee will meet again on Monday, March 15, at 4 p.m. in the council chambers.

► The council endorsed a resolution in support of the planned Mohawk Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail between Williamstown and the city and backing the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's pursuit of funds from the National Scenic Byways Grant Program. The Phase II funds would be used for engineering designs for the westernmost portion of the proposed trail.

► Appointed to the Human Services Commission for three-year terms were Maria A. Diamond and Shima owner Suzy Helme; for a one-year term, William Perreault. Reappointed to a three-year term was Suzanne Wick.

► Appointed to the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Arts Commission for three-year terms were Jo Ann Lipa Bates and Sandra Thomas.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Friday Front Porch Feature: A Charming House Like New

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

The home prior to renovations.

NORTH ADAMS, Mass. Are you looking for a newly renovated home with great space? Then this might be the perfect fit for you!

Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 100 Autumn Drive.

This three-bedroom, two-bathroom split level was built in 1965 and is 1,396 square feet on 0.32 acres.

The house was completely renovated recently. It includes a one-car garage, and comes with appliances including a dishwasher and stove/oven, and other major appliances.

The house is listed for $359,500.

We spoke with owners Michael Zeppieri and Chris Andrews, who did the renovations. Zeppieri is an agent with Alton and Westall Real Estate Agency.

What was your first impression when you walked into the home?

Zeppieri: I purchased this home to do a full renovation flip and saw tremendous potential in this mid-century split level home that had not been updated since it was built in the 1960s, in a great North Adams neighborhood.

 

Andrews: The house was a much different house when we first purchased it in 2022 (photo attached is from about 2010.)  The interior was painted all in dark colors and we brightened it up with neutral colors. The transformation makes you feel like you are in a totally different house.  

 

 

What were the recent renovations, any standout design features?

 

Zeppieri: The house has had a complete reconfiguration including new kitchen with high-end appliances, ceramic tiled baths, hardwood floors, new windows and roof ... just to name a few.  All a buyer has to do is move in and enjoy.

 

Andrews: Yes, we renovated the entire house.  New windows, new roof, all new custom black gutter system, new blacktop driveway, hardwood floors were installed through out the house. New kitchen and bathrooms as well as painting the exterior and interior of the house.  New paver patio in the back yard.

 

What kind of buyer would this home be ideal for?

 

Zeppieri: The buyer for this home could be a first-time homebuyer or a retiree ... the location is close to attractions in North Adams ... and the property is located in Autumn Heights, which is a very small residential development with several long-term owners.

 

Andrews: This home is truly ideal for a variety of buyers. Whether a first-time homebuyer, a small family or even someone looking to downsize from a larger home.

 

 

What do you think makes this property stand out in the current market?

 

Zeppieri: The location, price and move-in condition of this home make it a true market leader in the North Adams Market.

 

Andrews: This house is completely renovated and in a desirable location of North Adams. The natural light in the home really makes the interior pop. And with all the upgrades the home stays quite cool in the summer months.

Do you know any unique stories about the home or its history?

Zeppieri: This home was built for the Gould family in 1969 and they lived there till 2010. It was always a family home during that time in which the Goulds had two children ... and Virgina Gould managed Mohawk Forest Apartments and was a very active resident of North Adams.

 

Andrews: Built in about 1965.

 

What do the current owners love about this home?

 

Zeppieri: As the current owner it was a fun project to transform this home and get it ready for its next adventure with a new family to enjoy for many years.

 

Andrews: No one has lived in the house since we purchased the home. The new owners would be the first to live in the house since the renovations have been completed.

 

 

What would you say to a buyer trying to imagine their life in this space?

 

Andrews: I would suggest seeing the house either on a sunny day or at twilight to really get a vision of how special the home feels.  

 

You can find out more about this house on its listing here.

*Front Porch Feature brings you an exclusive to some of the houses listed on our real estate page every week. Here we take a bit of a deeper dive into a certain house for sale and ask questions so you don't have to.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories