image description
Donna McKechnie, left, Diana DiMarzio, Jessica Tyler Wright, Jane Pfitsch and Lauren Molina are the many Miss Joneses.

'Ten Cents a Dance' Snoozy Stroll Down Memory Lane

By Larry MurrayBerkshire on Stage
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — There were five of us who met up at the first matinee of "Ten Cents a Dance" at the Williamstown Theatre Festival, all musical fans, and the reaction was that two loved it, three hated it. Trying to find something positive to balance my feeling that it is an overproduced "Snooze-ical" is a challenge.

In what the publicists describe as the "American Premiere," the director, John Doyle, first staged this song-cycle featuring nearly 30 Rodgers and Hart tunes and a wisp of a narrative in 2002 at the Watermill Playhouse in West Berkshire, England.

Both that production and this could be accurately described as a series of the very nice songs of Rodgers and Hart performed very nicely.

Doyle has gained quite a reputation for engaging performers who not only can do vocals, but also can double as the orchestra. They alternate their vocals with intermittent turns on the sax, trumpet, drums and strings. Doyle did this to superb effect in the past with both "Sweeney Todd" and "Company."

The artistic conceit was born, Doyle admits, of economic necessity. "Ten Cents a Dance" has an abstract, dreamlike quality, as the actors circle around the stage in choreographed movements with their instruments, shifting from, say, viola to vibraphone to trumpet.

"It's a little like watching a piece of modern dance. You don't need it to be explained to you. You accept that it is nonlinear, you seep into it, and you yourself interpret the images," Doyle is quoted as saying.

In the Williamstown revision, five actors played Miss Jones 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 who shared the classic songs culled from the 500 or so Rodgers and Hart wrote. They are, in order, Lauren Molina, Jane Pfitsch, Jessica Tyler Wright, Diana DiMarzio and Donna McKechnie. Rounding out the ensemble is Malcolm Gets as Johnny, who is also an accomplished piano player.

Scott Pask created a haunted, dreamlike set for the sextet to sleepwalk through, for the energy level seemed to be set fairly low. Without a real book or plot, "Ten Cents a Dance" is a series of cleverly arranged medleys of song based on the flimsiest of similarities.

In the original production, the singers buzzed around the stage on rolling chairs, but in the WTF production, only the bass was on rollers, and the piano rotated all too frequently as the various Miss Jones' preened and posed in their 1930s floral print dresses and overdone hair.

What a waste of perfectly good talent.

None got to sing a whole song straight through either, and to earn their own individual applause. In fact, the mooshing of one song into the next stifled audience applause, and the overly moody staging acted to shut down any connection between performers and listeners.

This production worked for those who simply wanted to hear the music of Rodgers and Hart in a new way, and, forgive me for saying this, but it was a lot like elevator music. Safe and bloodless. Perhaps others enjoyed hearing the words, or the music in a nonthreatening way.


Donna McKechnie in the spotlight with Malcolm Gets as Johnny at the piano.
Ten Cents a Dance
conceived & directed by John Doyle
music by Richard Rodgers
& lyrics by Lorenz Hart

Cast

Johnny – Malcolm Gets
Miss Jones 1 – Lauren Molina
Miss Jones 2 – Jane Pfitsch
Miss Jones 3 – Jessica Tyler Wright
Miss Jones 4 – Diana DiMarzio
Miss Jones 5 – Donna McKechnie

Scott Pask (Sets), Ann Hould-Ward (Costumes), Jane Cox (Lights) Dan Moses-Schreier (Sound), Paul Huntley (Wigs), Dontee Kiehn (Movement Consultant), Mary-Mitchell Campbell (Musical Director and Orchestrator).

Runs Aug. 11-28, 80 minutes with no intermission, on the Main Stage, Williamstown Theatre Festival.
You might feel a bit cheated. They had Donna McKechnie on that stage and the most she was told to do is wave her arms now and then and swirl the hem of her dress? No wonder a colleague observed that far too much of the music was Butchered, Bothered and Bewildered. All too often it was like a choir performance, not two Broadway legendary composers being honored.

Broken into five "episodes" the segments were titled "The Blue Room," "Isn't It Romantic," "Manhattan," "Ten Cents a Dance" and "Quiet Night." There was also an encore consisting of reprises. There were 32 different songs all told.

It's really a toss up when it comes to recommending it or not, since those who enjoyed the show did so because they love Rodgers and Hart. And those who thought it terrible said they disliked it because they love Rodgers and Hart.

The set and lighting was very evocative of a warehouse of memories. And there was a giant spiral staircase (which show has that appeared in before?) which served for slow, deliberate entrance and exits.

Except when the walls turned blue ("Blue Moon," "Little Girl Blue," "A Blue Room") the overall effect of the surroundings was more of a chiaroscuro film than a musical. There was a moodiness and muddiness to the musings of Mr. Jones, which seemed to darken so many of the songs. One can only speculate as to what the subtext to all this was; he seemed pretty unhappy, even as he shed his tux down to a wife-beater tee. Don't ask me what that meant.

The five Miss Joneses seemed to represent his great love at various stages of his relationship. Still it was hard to tell, mostly they just continually circled around the piano like some seniors on a mall walk. Some of the music was sung in unison, missing acres of harmonic possibilities.

If you like the music of Rodgers and Hart, and theater that lulls you and conjures up old love affairs, hazy memories, and days gone by, this is the perfect show to enjoy.

But if you like singers to really sell their songs, to belt them out, to put real heart and soul into the lyrics, well, perhaps you might wait until a real musical comes along.

Larry Murray is a contributor to iBerkshires.com and offers reviews and arts news from around the region at Berkshire On Stage.


Tags: WTF,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories