MCAS Data Shows Pittsfield, Adams, North Adams Schools Under Performing

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Adams-Cheshire Regional School District is one of three county districts that are in the Level 3 category — meaning at least one school in the district is performing in the bottom 20 percent of the state.
ADAMS, Mass. — The school districts that serve the county's three largest municipalities are not meeting their proficiency goals.

Adams-Cheshire Regional, Pittsfield and North Adams school districts have at least one school performing in the bottom 20 percent of the state, according to the newest method of analyzing the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) testing scores for school improvement released last month.

The scores and schools were once assessed by Adequate Yearly Progress but the state received a waiver from some federal requirements implemented by No Child Left Behind in January and have switched methods.

The new method, the Progress and Performance Index, assesses the school with the goal of reducing proficiency gaps in half by 2017 instead of the 100 percent proficiency goals set by No Child Left Behind. The reports have a stronger emphasis on student progress rather than sheer achievement.

The major difference between the two methods is that the new the Progress and Performance Index measures reward the schools for student growth, uses four years of data and isn't a simple yes or no on whether the school made standards.

Through a complicated formula, scores are given to various subgroups — such as all students, students with disabilities, income and race — and the goal is for an overall score of 75 or higher. A passing score would mean the district has hit its benchmarks for improvement in the various subgroups.

Only five districts achieved a 75 or above for all students in the four-year period — Lenox, Mount Greylock, Northern Berkshire Vocational (McCann Technical School), Lanesborough and Williamstown. In addition, Berkshire Arts & Technology Charter Public School also achieved Level 1.

The Adams-Cheshire Regional School District scored 61 this year and 53 over four years for all students; North Adams scored 29 this year with 38 over the four years; Pittsfield a 50 and a four-year score of 68.

In contrast, the county's highest scoring school districts were Mount Greylock Regional School District with 107 this year for all students and a four-year score of 88 and Lenox with a 107 and  a four-year score of 91.

Overall, Mount Greylock, because of the other subgroups, earned a  Level 1 ranking, which indicates that the goals for proficiency gaps are being met. There were 96 school districts — about 25 percent — statewide that were classified as Level 1.

The majority of both county and statewide schools received Level 2 rankings, meaning they are not reaching the goals for all of the subgroups. More than half of the schools statewide were ranked at Level 2.

The county's Level 3 districts — Pittsfield, North Adams and Adams-Cheshire — are ranked there because at least one school in the district is performing in the bottom 20 percent of the state. A total of 71 school districts statewide were categorized in Level 3.

In Adams, CT Plunkett Elementary School earned the Level 3 ranking despite scoring higher in the all-students category than the rest of the district this year and about the same as the others in the four-year aggregate. However, Plunkett is also the only Title 1 school in the district.

Plunkett showed vast improvement in the students with disabilities subgroup and improved in the students with high needs this year. Overall, the school did not improve its score for all students this year.

In North Adams, Drury High School ranked in Level 3 — showing a lack of improvement with the students with high needs and low income. However, the school did show a vast improvement in the all students category this year.

In Pittsfield, Crosby Elementary School, Conte Community School, Pittsfield High School and Taconic High School were all deemed Level 3 while Morningside Community School, Stearns Elementary School, Williams Elementary School and Reid Middle School all received Level 1 status.

Taconic was cited for having a persistently low graduation rate and the lack of improvement in the students with disabilities subgroup. Pittsfield High School met its target for all students but scored low in the high needs, low income and particularly low in the students with disabilities group. Crosby has high numbers for 2012 but are still one of the lowest performing schools in the state, according to the four-year aggregate. The school scored low in the students with disabilities group.

Clarification: Updated on Oct. 11 to include McCann Tech and BArT, which were inadvertently left out as Level 1 schools.

Tags: MCAS,   

1 Comments welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to

Ethics Commission Alleges Conflict Violations by West Stockbridge Chief

WEST STOCKBRIDGE, Mass. — The Enforcement Division of the State Ethics Commission on Wednesday filed an order to show cause alleging that West Stockbridge Fire Chief Peter Skorput, a former Select Board member, committed multiple conflict-of-interest law violations, including setting stipends for himself, his daughter and his nephew; voting as a Select Board member to reappoint himself fire chief; and terminating a firefighter who had filed a complaint against him.
According to the order, shortly after Skorput was elected to the Select Board in 2013, a West Stockbridge official contacted the town's counsel about conflict-of-interest law exemptions available to Skorput regarding his serving both as a Select Board member and fire chief. 
Allegedly, town counsel advised the official that Skorput follow the requirements for a particular conflict-of-interest law exemption that would allow him to accept pay for both positions, and this was communicated to Skorput. From the time he was elected until January 2017, however, Skorput did not meet the exemption requirements and violated the conflict of law by continuing to hold his compensated fire chief position after his election to the Select Board, according to the order.
The order further alleges Skorput violated the conflict-of-interest law by participating officially in matters involving his own and his daughter's financial interests. In 2013, Skorput allegedly voted as a Select Board member to reappoint himself as fire chief. Also, as fire chief, he allegedly decided the amount of firefighter stipends for himself each December in 2013-2015 and for his daughter in 2013 and 2014, and as a Select Board member signed the pay warrants for his daughter's stipends. Additionally, at several Select Board meetings in 2015 and 2016, Skorput allegedly participated as a Select Board member in the board's review of complaints about his performance as fire chief.
View Full Story

More South Berkshire Stories