The Board of Health on Monday voted to enact new tobacco regulations after a brief public hearing with little opposition.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Board of Health on Monday voted to enact new tobacco regulations aimed at cutting back on youth smoking and smoking in public places.
The board held a public hearing on the proposed regulations that drew comments from four members of the public — all in favor of the proposed regulations.
Although no one rose in opposition to the changes, the board did receive written communication from a couple of New England retail merchants associations expressing concern about the rules.
After a hearing that took about 25 minutes and little discussion from the panel, the board voted unanimously to put the new rules into effect on Jan. 5, 2015.
Starting then, smoking will be prohibited at bars and restaurants in any exterior space where food or beverages are "received, stored, prepared, served or consumed." The town already had a ban on interior spaces.
Most of the new regulations impact retailers. Pharmacies will not be allowed to sell any tobacco products. The sale of flavored tobacco products (other than menthol, mint or wintergreen) will be prohibited. And single cigar sales will be banned, except for "premium" cigars with a price of $2.50 or more.
Anti-tobacco advocates argue that flavored tobacco and single sales are two of the methods the industry uses to lure young smokers.
Lois Daunis of the Northern Berkshire Community Coalition's nb21 program praised the board for taking steps to curb smoking in youth.
"We survey youth about substance abuse," she said. "Since 2006, the survey shows a steady decline of students ever having tried cigarettes or having used them in the last 30 days. However, many students are still smoking."
In fact, up to 5 percent of the teens surveyed in Northern Berkshire County report "heavy use," defined as half a pack a day or more, Daunis said.
"We've also seen a spike recently in Northern Berkshire communities in the use of smokeless tobacco products," she said. "Nearly 20 percent of youth have tried them."
D.J. Wilson of the Massachusetts Municipal Association's Tobacco Control Technical Assistance Program told the board that while "e-cigarettes" may be less of a health risk than cigarettes, they still cause addiction to tobacco in young people.
"There are dual users, who use both [products] depending on where they are," Wilson said. "That's the perfect world for the tobacco industry."
E-cigarettes, like conventional tobacco products, are manufactured in a wide variety of flavors — like Gummy Bears — that appeal directly to young smokers.
"If you look at little cigar bans and flavor bans together, it will have a significant impact," said Joan Rubel of the Berkshire Area Health Education Center, who advised the Board of Health when it was developing the new rules.
On Monday, the board also heard from Gail Lesure of the Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. She reminded the panel about the dangers of second-hand smoke.
Retired physician Dr. Thomas Hyde used Monday's hearing to pitch a suggestion to the board.
Hyde, a Williamstown resident, suggested that the next step for the town could be to ban tobacco sales to anyone under the age of 21.
"The overwhelming majority of high school students who get [cigarettes] get them from people who are 18, 19, 20 years old," Hyde said. "The data shows that having 21 years old as the minimum age you can buy a tobacco product reduces teen smoking."
According to a 2012 Surgeon General's Report cited on the American Cancer Society website, nearly 90 percent of adult smokers started the habit by age 18.
One Massachusetts town, Needham, pioneered a 21-year-old minimum to buy tobacco back in 1995. Since then, 29 Massachusetts communities have followed suit, Wilson told the board.
"This graph shows you that the rate of high school smoking in Needham went from around 16 percent to around 7 percent in the first four years after they passed the law," Hyde said, showing the board data to support his argument.
"The fact of the matter is high school smoking is dependent on the 18-, 19-, 20-year-olds who buy cigarettes and share them or sell them to their friends."
Members of the board at Monday's meeting seemed enthusiastic about adding Williamstown to the list of towns that have banned tobacco sales to anyone under 21, but they expressed reluctance to take that step immediately without seeking public input.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: Vote No on 'Jungle' Primaries
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
They don't call them "jungle primaries" for nothing.
Question 3 on the November ballot would trash two-party primary elections and replace them with California-style, chaotic — and extraordinarily costly — "jungle" primaries that would destroy the very political parties that have kept America stable since Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison created them in the 1790s.
Jungle primaries put all candidates, regardless of party, on one ballot with the top two vote-getters facing off in the general election — even if they're from the same party. That would create chaos, but the real issue is money: Jungle primaries give a distinct advantage to candidates backed by corporate money and the super wealthy. In short, jungle primaries move our primaries from the ballot box to big donor meetings long before campaigning even begins.
When something this radical is proposed, you have to look at who's behind it, who's funding it, and ask "why" they are doing it.
Their philosophical guru is Danielle Allen, a Harvard professor who ran for governor in 2022 but couldn't get 15 percent of the Democratic Convention vote to win the party's endorsement.
The money behind this extreme attack on small "d" democratic politics tells us more. With over $5 million in the bank as of Aug. 28, this is a very well-funded campaign — the lion's share of which came from wealthy Boston-area private equity individuals.
Twenty-two private equity executives gave $3.99 million, or 77 percent of all the money from individuals. Current and former Bain Capital executives contributed $1.92 million, and Berkshire Partners executives put up $1.32 million. In short, 22 rich people put up nearly $4 million to change how five million of us vote. Yes, it seems the ultra-wealthy want to destroy the two-party system that has kept our politics stable for 200 years.
The community-based non-profit organizations that operate local access cable TV channels in the Berkshires have been expanding their roles and strengthening their ties to their communities to adapt to the volatile era of "new media."
click for more
Unlike two weeks ago more people turned out Monday to urge the board to accept the plan to hang the Hometown Hero banners on utility poles around town between Memorial Day and Veterans Day starting in the spring of 2027. click for more
The Cooperative Hoosac Valley football program will resume football related activities on Monday, Sept. 28, after being on “pause” for the past nine days. click for more
The festivities, scheduled for 1 to 5 p.m., will feature a demonstration by a professional skateboarder, food and music to celebrate the long-sought publicly/privately funded facility. click for more