Adams-Cheshire To Make Official Proposal To Lanesborough

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
An Adams-Cheshire subcommittee is looking into hard figures to give Lanesborough.

CHESHIRE, Mass. — Adams and Cheshire will pen a formal request to enter into discussions with Lanesborough about dissolving its affiliations with Williamstown.

The Adams-Cheshire Regional School District's Audit and Evaluation subcommittee met Monday with administration and town officials from Cheshire and Adams to discuss a recent letter from Williamstown and Lanesborough requesting a proposal for educational partnership by Oct 1.

"I think they want to see our numbers in writing and a written explanation of how we would go forward and how it would happen form our end," Adams Town Administrator Tony Mazzucco said. "Just so they would have a working document to go with."

In the last few months, Adams-Cheshire has been in communication with Lanesborough about possibly tuitioning high school and middle school students from Lanesborough to Hoosac Valley to save both towns more than $1 million each.  

Lanesborough has been in a regional agreement with Williamstown to send its upper grade students to Mount Greylock Regional School; that district is currently in the renovation process for the high and middle school. It is also in a supervisory union with Williamstown Elementary, and both Mount Greylock and SU 71 share a superintendent and other administrators.

Mazzucco said he thinks Lanesborough wants the letter before winter and when it will have to commit to building a new Mount Greylock. He said this will give Lanesborough time to gauge what the community wants.

Business Manager David Hinkle said the tuition cost would most likely be similar to what the district charges Savoy — nearly $9,000 a student. He said this cost is taken directly from the state foundation budget and does not include over-foundation, capital or transportation costs.

He added Lanesborough would pay for its own transportation and it is yet to be decided if that would be included in the tuition cost.

Subcommittee member Darlene Rodowicz suggested calculating a number that would be less antiquated and maybe include some of the over-foundation items. She said the contract negotiated with Savoy was created when the state foundation budget was more substantial.

"It is not the environment we live in today and even if we pass along our full cost of education it would still be far less than what they pay to Mount Greylock," she said. "I think we are looking for a bargain for them, but a bargain for us."

Superintendent Kristen Gordon suggested creating a working group to research how many new students would enter each grade level and what new faculty and facility needs the school would require before providing a number.

Rodowicz agreed.

"We don't know what we will need, and we are kind of stabbing in the dark," Rodowicz said. "Instead of saying what the number would be, we could develop a framework and goals we are trying to accomplish and they would share equally the costs of providing an education."

Mazzucco said it is important to make sure the number remains enticing to Lanesborough. He said much of the costs such as administration and utilities will remain fixed at Hoosac Valley because it has the capacity for the extra 190 students.

Rodowicz agreed but said she wanted to make sure they understand the numbers and impacts of more students.

"I want to be able to say to the whole community that we are all winners in this, and I think there is a lot of opportunity," she said. "We can strengthen the education in the communities and cover overhead better, and I just want to make sure we understand it."

Muzzucco added that the tuition amount and what Lanesborough pays for would be up for negotiation between the school committees anyways.

Muzzucco said the Lanesborough School Committee chairman asked if superintendent responsibilities would change in Lanesborough. He said the original plan was to leave everything as is, however the proposal should mention it and Adams-Cheshire would be open to changes if Lanesborough wished.

He added they may want to include an implementation plan in the proposal. He said if Lanesborough desired certain classes they could be phased into Hoosac Valley in a six-year period so students are not changing schools. He said this would be an easier transition for both towns.

Mazzucco said the proposal could include flexible options such as an "all in" scenario in which all Lanesborough high school and middle school students go to Hoosac Valley or partial tuition in which a certain amount of space is kept open for Lanesborough students

Subcommittee member Paul Butler inquired about school committee membership and how Lanesborough should have representation.

The subcommittee agreed that a nonvoting member may be the best option but with the opportunity to become a full member of the district if the town wanted to in the future.

"It’s almost like buying a car versus leasing a car," Butler said. "Leasing is cheaper but you don't get to keep it in the end."


Tags: ACRSD,   MGRHS,   tuition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Fire Deliberates Next Steps on Retirement Mandate

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

ADAMS, Mass. — The Fire Department is seeking clarifications on how the state's mandatory retirement age for firefighters will affect its older members who aren't involved in firefighting. 

Earlier this month, the Fire District questioned the impact of the retirement mandate after four Dalton firefighters, including the interim chief, had to retire.

During a workshop on Monday, board members said they will seek a legal opinion regarding the district's available options. With Chief John Pansecchi set to retire, First Assistant Engineer David Lennon intends to run for the chief position, while Edward Capeless plans to run for Lennon's current role.

Pansecchi went over some of the department's policies, stating that members 65 and older are just support members and are exterior only (as opposed to entering a building).

The board is looking to also clarify its insurance related to what ages it covered. 

"We have documentation that in 2021 our insurance company said that we were covered for everything, but after 70 we weren't covered for heart circulation. We're trying to verify the current age," Pansecchi said, stating the company may have changed its policies.

He also would like to know if the district creates a separate support person, what would be needed to make sure they cover their insurance bases.

Lennon brought examples from other communities which have had to deal with the mandatory retirements and how they used home rule petitions through the Legislature to keep older firefighters on. Some had done it by department and some by individuals, and got district meeting votes before applying. 

They plan to ask state Rep. John Barrett III to guide them on a home-rule petition as well as look at sample language from others who have applied.

Lennon suggested having fire company members who are 65 and older not wear fire gear at a scene,  but rather a coat or vest that will show they are affiliated with the department.

"What we would like to do, to keep the Prudential Committee comfortable with what's going on, because we do want to have safety for all of our firefighters," he said. "The safety of my guys that are inside are directly affected by the person I have outside. So he's making judgement calls, and he's getting resources that we need, and there needs to be somebody to do that.

"And when take some of those people away that can do that, but can't be interior, we remove more interior people, which is not advantageous."

He said Capeless is a valuable asset as he usually is outside of the fire.

"We just had a structure fire, and the way that worked was, we got to work. We took over command, stayed outside. He did the radio work. He got resources while the people were inside. Now, if we take that out of that picture, that means one of the people working [inside] has to now go outside, and so that's where we come down to," Lennon said.

The team is also working with legal counsel to find out if support members should be driving the vehicles and what other liability exposures there might be.

Pansecchi said the department is comprised of a core of 15 members and will lose one once he leaves next month, and the loss of another five affected by the mandate will have a deleterious impact.

"Thirty-three on the roster. If you remove these five individuals, bring us down to 28 out of those, one's on regular military leave, two apprentices have not been showing up and may be removed in their future, one of the engineers has not responded to a call in months," he said. "That brings us down to 23 then we have about eight members, not including the above members, that have made less than 10 percent of the calls." 

Board members agreed to start the uniform differential with the older members and said  they will consider next once they have more information.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories