About 60 Fire District members attend the annual meeting; nearly 1,000 cast votes in the election.
ADAMS, Mass. — The Fire District voted to keep the status quo and shot down the proposition to increase the fire chief position to full time.
Voters were decisive in rejecting the ballot item in Tuesday's election with only 159 in favor of increasing the position while 804 voted no.
"It is what it is," said current Chief John Pansecchi, who had strongly advocated for the change. "Still have to do the job and still will do the job. I just hope that we have the manpower during the day because it is just going to get harder and harder."
The concept of a full-time fire chief arose late last year when Pansecchi went public with his desire to increase his position to full time.
Pansecchi, who also has a full-time job, felt with increased calls, duties, reporting, and inspections a full-time chief was needed. He also thought it would put the town in line with other smaller communities who have a full-time chief.
Pansecchi said he was not happy with the entire process and thought there was a campaign of misinformation working against him. In some cases, he alleged it was from the Prudential Committee members themselves.
"There were so many lies ... this is not the way to do this," he said. "It was put together to fail."
Pansecchi also advocated for a single full-time firefighter who would add consistent and faster response times during the day. This employee could also help with maintenance and share some of the administrative duties with the chief.
This, too, failed to pass with only 133 votes in the positive and 830 in the negative.
Pansecchi said this is not the end and he will continue to push for the permanent positions he thinks is critical to the volunteer department.
"We have to do it ... just because it was voted down doesn't mean we can't look at it again," he said. "I have done ton of research on this."
Voter turnout was comparably high with 975 votes cast out of the 5,045 eligible voters. Treasure Kathleen Fletcher said typically they just break 100 votes.
As for the Fire District annual meeting, members voted on 18 articles much of which were procedural items voted on annually.
The warrant included an array of articles that built out the $2,177,361 budget, which is down 21 percent from this year's budget of $2,777,800.
Articles 10 through 15 represented state mandates from the Departments of Environmental Protection and Conservation and Recreation that if not approved would come with a greater cost.
District members accepted these articles with little pause and flew through the warrant in 15 minutes.
Members also accepted Article 10 that allocates $100,000 to continue the process of replacing aging water meters and Article 11 that allocates $35,000 to develop an asset management plan.
Article 12, which allocates $66,500, for the Master Plan passed as well as Article 13 that puts $24,000 aside for an Emergency Action Plan.
The majority of district members accepted Article 14, which appropriates $15,500 for an emergency response plan, and Article 15, which allocates $21,500 to update the operations and maintenance manual.
Article 16, the last budgetary vote of the night, asked the district to place $25,000 in the stabilization fund.
Almost 60 district members were present at the meeting that adjourned at 7:15 once the warrant was voted on and again a little after 7:30 once the ballot votes were completely tallied.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.
The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.
Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.
These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.
This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.
For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.
I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.
Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.
Carlo has been selling clothes she's thrifted from her Facebook page for the past couple of years. She found the building at 64 Summer St. about two months ago and opened on Jan. 11.
click for more
Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 53 Depot St. click for more