image description

Limited Parking Causes Issues on Mount Greylock Summit

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — After a busy season with parking challenges, the Mount Greylock Advisory Council will explore alternative ways to get people to the summit.
 
Becky Barnes of the state Department of Conservation and Recreation told the council Thursday that this summer and fall were busy on the summit of Mount Greylock and they often had to close the road once the parking lot was at capacity.
 
"We really need to explore other ways to reach the summit for our visitors especially on these high visitation days," Barnes said. "There has to be some other way to get visitors to the summit ... we have to do some outside of the box thinking." 
 
Barnes said specifically on Columbus Day weekend the summit was so busy that staff could only let a car in once one left. She said cars were parking improperly and creating safety concerns.
 
Expanding the parking lot is not an option because there are so many endangered species on the summit. She felt the most viable solution would be to implement some sort of shuttle service that could drive people up and down the mountain. 
 
Barnes added that there would still be issues to work out, and people would still have to park at the base of the mountain where there also is limited parking. Also, she said it is hard to drive larger vehicles up the summit road.
 
There is no funding for this, and it was unlikely that the state would fund a shuttle service. 
 
The council felt that if the state plans to continue to advertise the mountain to visitors it needs to step up and provide resources for traffic management.
 
Councilors also suggested somehow allowing people to reserve spaces on the mountain to limit congestion.
 
Superintendent Travis Clairmont suggested that charging at the base of the mountain instead of the summit could discourage and limit traffic. 
 
"Instead we had them drive all the way up the mountain, congest traffic, and then we get no money from them when we kick them off the mountain," he said.
 
Chairman Cosmo Catalano asked that the council continue to brainstorm and have some sort of solution in place before the return of the summer season.
 
Clairmont said staff has been extra busy on the mountain during the pandemic cleaning up trash and maintaining trails. 
 
"Obviously it has been really different here than years past with having not everything open and ... just about every day is a weekend day," he said. "We have had a ridiculous level of visitation."
 
Barnes added that the trails have been also used a lot and some trail braiding, or new lines along a trail, has occurred as people try to socially distance during hikes. 
 
"We think it is when people try to avoid each other on the trails," Barnes said. "There are almost three trails moving down the Thunderbolt and I am pretty sure it is people stepping off the trail because of the COVID situation."
 
She added there have also been quite a few lost hikers this season. She attributed this to the closure of the visitors' center during the summer.
 
"They were unable to get that information they really need to start their trip off," she said.
 
Clairmont said the last day the summit road will likely be open is Halloween, on Saturday, Oct. 31. He said personally he would like to close it even earlier. Typically the mountain closes Nov. 1.

Tags: Mount Greylock,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Planning Board Cited for Open Meeting Law Violation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The state Attorney General's Office has determined that the Planning Board violated Open Meeting Law by continuing to deliberate on a matter after adjournment.
 
According to the determination, the violation occurred after adjourning the Jan. 27, 2025, meeting when three board members stayed to discuss permitting concerns for Aisling Mountain Farm, a 22-acre equestrian facility on West Road owned by Kathryn Foley.
 
The board was ordered to amend its meeting minutes within the next 30 days, to include a summary of the discussion that occurred after the meeting was adjourned, to certify to to the AG's Office that it has done so, and to comply with the Open Meeting Law going forward.
 
The ruling stems from a complaint filed by Catherine Foster on Aug. 22, 2025, alleging that the board violated the Open Meeting Law during and after its Jan. 27 meeting.
 
Although filed nearly seven months after the January meeting, the Attorney General's Office said it met the 30-day filing deadline because Foster did not become aware of the situation until it was raised at a July 23 Select Board meeting.
 
"The Open Meeting Law requires that complaints be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation, or if the alleged violation could not reasonably have been known at the time it occurred, then within 30 days of the date it should reasonably have been discovered," Assistant Attorney General Matthew Lindberg said in the determination.
 
"The complainant could not reasonably have discovered that the Board deliberated after adjournment of the January 27 meeting until the issue was raised during public comment at the July 23 Select Board meeting. Because the complaint was filed within 30 days of the July 23 Select Board meeting, the complaint was filed timely as to this allegation"
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories