Letter: Pittsfield Public Schools: Opportunity for Change

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

The Pittsfield Federation of School Employees are the Bus Drivers and Bus Monitors who make sure your child gets to and from school safely each day. We are the cafeteria workers who prepare and serve good-tasting nutritious meals and snacks to your child. We are the custodians who make sure that your child's school is clean and safe. We are the educational secretaries who work to ensure your child's safety and well-being are accounted for daily. We are the paraprofessionals who work side by side with our teachers every day to provide your child with the education they deserve.

Most importantly — we are the parents who send our children to be educated in the Pittsfield Public Schools. We are writing this letter because we are tired!

We are tired because during a worldwide pandemic and a nationwide bus driver shortage — during a time when the Pittsfield Public Schools struggle to hire and retain staff — our bus drivers and monitors are forced to choose between coming to work sick and going without a paycheck — because they do not have paid sick leave.

We are tired because our cafeteria workers who have risen to the challenge and met ever-increasing COVID-19 production levels with inadequate staffing are now forced to come up with money — money they don't have — to pay the district for their family's health insurance premiums because they don't get paid vacation like other 10-month employees during the upcoming Christmas, February, and April recess.

We are tired because our overworked custodial staff who have endured months of forced overtime and inadequate staffing contend each day with an endless list of COVID-19-related tasks just so that our school buildings can stay open.

We are tired because our paraprofessionals, who normally are not transferred during the school year because of the disruption it causes to student learning, are being transferred in unprecedented numbers due to the current staffing shortage. We are tired because our paraprofessionals are working, and the children of Pittsfield are learning in unsafe conditions because of inadequate staffing and this administration's unwillingness to apply appropriate corrective discipline to disruptive/threatening students.

We are tired because this administration continues to hire new staff at hourly rates below the current state minimum wage of ($13.50/hour), rates which are by definition "oppressive and unreasonable."

We are tired because this administration, who gave themselves raises of 9-12 percent, keep telling us that none the district's $29.9 Million in federal and state aid can be used to adjust and increase our salaries — and we know that's simply not true!

We are tired because we must work two and three jobs to support our families because this administration does not properly value the work that we do!

We are tired because this administration refuses to acknowledge how much our families are suffering because they cannot see it from the neighborhoods where they live!

We are tired of being exploited and ignored!

The Pittsfield Public Schools are struggling, but unlike the past the problem isn't a lack of funding — it's a lack of vision and leadership. We cannot hope to give our children the schools they deserve unless we adequately staff them. What should be abundantly clear to our leaders and elected officials is the fact that we cannot begin to properly staff our schools unless we start to compensate people (our teachers and support staff) fairly for the important work that they do.

The recent School Committee elections are a reason to be hopeful — the results represent an opportunity to truly change the way our public schools are run. Change however, will require the newly elected School Committee to do more than just take the guided tour.

Sandi Amburn
President, Pittsfield Federation
of School Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Tags: letters to the editor,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planners Hold Public Hearing on Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing last week on a bylaw for mobile accessory dwelling units (ADU) that will be brought before a special town meeting.

For nearly two years, Amy Turnbull has been trying to amend the current ADU bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes.  

A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile. Most homes considered "tiny" are built on a trailer so they can be towed.

Her proposal defines a movable tiny house as a "residential property with an existing primary house, intended for year-round living," and outlines eight conditions for approval.

Among these conditions: the unit must adhere to accessory dwelling unit regulations, undergo site plan review, be licensed and registered with the state Registry of Motor Vehicles, have approved energy, water, and wastewater systems, and comply with American National Standards Institute 119.5 and National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements.

Additionally, the unit must be certified for ANSI or NFPA compliance by a manufacturer or third-party inspector, including adherence to Appendix Q and the International Residential Code's structural guidelines and energy efficiency standards. The tiny house cannot move under its own power, and its undercarriage, wheels, axles, tongue, and hitch must be concealed from view. Wheels and leveling or support jacks are required to rest on a level gravel or paved surface.

Turnbull has gotten enough signatures for her petition to amend the current bylaws to add her definition of the mobile ADUs. Last Wednesday, the board held a public hearing on the petitions, which will be voted on at a special meeting.

Turnbull says she has two reasons for wanting to add this to the town's bylaws: aging in place and affordable housing.

"We need a variety of housing types in Dalton, and that we also need to address the idea that you know nearly 30 percent of our population by 2035 is going to be over 65 years old, and it's problematic because  ... there's not enough choice for these people to to age in place,"she said. "What movable tiny houses does, is it provides a less restrictive ADU. It's much cheaper to place, and it's easier to place, less time consuming. And what it offers to people is it offers people who are owners a place for their children to come and live, or a caregiver to come and live, or for the people who own their own house to come and live while they rent out their maybe their three bedroom home to a new family who wants to attend to Craneville simultaneously."

She said people need to move away from calling and treating the tiny homes as though they are trailers, as one former Planning Board member has voiced opinions on.

"That is an opinion, and I think we need to get over that, because I want to say that these are foundation homes, and that the chassis is a foundation, and it's a stick-built home on a chassis, and in very many ways it's like a modular house. I think we will not be surprised in the next 10 years if we see the market turn around and start to make smaller, tiny modular homes, but that is not the case right now, and we have a dire need for affordable housing," she said.

At a former Fire District meeting the Water Department drafted regulations for water hook-ups for these types of homes. The superintendent sent a letter to the Planning Board to be read at the meeting stating it will not be a hindrance for sewer system connection.

"The Department of Public Works does not feel that mobile ADUs will be an issue with the town sewer system. The homeowners will be responsible for any issues outside of the sewer main and connect and responsible for connecting in, so that would address any permits, fees, or anything like that would be added to that," the letter states. 

"The Water Department, as we've stated previous, and as you stated, the water department has come up with their own set of SOPs, standard operating procedures, for hooking up a an adu and a mobile adu, which will then have to meet winterization and all those, but they've laid out a plan for that, that they have, so I'd like to point that out," board Chair Robert Collins said.

One concern was raised that if someone can have a mobile ADU could they also have another tiny home on their property, including the main house. That situation is not likely, said Turnbull, as it would cost a considerable amount of money. Town Manager Eric Anderson also stated that in his former community when they adopted similar laws their first one wasn’t put in until a couple years later and then maybe one a year.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories