Dalton Planners Consider Drive-Thru Bylaw

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The town is mulling the idea of allowing businesses other than banks and car washes to have drive-throughs.
 
On Thursday, the Planning Board continued the vote on a proposed drive-through bylaw amendment that would allow such a facility at any primary business use. The panel will take up the proposal again at its next meeting on Wednesday.
 
Town Planner Grant McGregor presented the bylaw amendment to the board.
 
In Chapter 350 of the town's code, the Table of Use Regulations states that drive-through facilities are permitted for banks, financial institutions, and car washes only with all other uses specifically excluded.
 
The amendment states that drive-through facilities are currently permitted for banks, financial institutions, and all other primary business uses for the purpose of growing economic development.
 
The board voted to add a section to the proposal stating that drive-through facilities for primary uses (other than banks and car washes) are not permitted in the town's four residential zones.
 
In business and industrial districts, primary use drive-throughs would be permitted through a special permit with the Board of Appeals.
 
The current bylaw states that banks with drive-throughs and carwashes are permitted in all residential zones and require a special permit from the Board of Appeals for business and industrial zones.  Part of why the board continued the vote was to make sure that it does not interfere with existing businesses.
 
Other town panels have weighed in on the bylaw proposal with varying views.
 
After some clarification, the Traffic Commission took a vote of no objection that same day.
 
Last Monday, the town's Historical Commission held a special meeting to discuss the proposal and voted not to approve it as written. The commission would like to have it spelled out that no drive-throughs excluding banks and car washes are allowed in the town's historic districts.
 
"It is a vital importance that the historic integrity of the downtown corridor be protected," the commission's vice chair wrote to the Planning Board. "Many towns in Berkshire County do not allow drive-thrus in the historic downtown corridors and we feel Dalton should follow their example in keeping our appeal as a small historic New England town."
 
The Dalton Review Board, which is strictly an advisory board with no power to approve or disprove any issue, submitted correspondence saying it does not see any issues with the existing historic district and that there doesn't appear to be any business or industrial properties in the historic district.
 
During a 2014, town meeting, a drive-through bylaw amendment was not passed.  
 
Selectman John Boyle spoke to the opposition.
 
"The opposition feels as though like a McDonald's is going to move to Dalton and open up on Main street next to St. Agnes' church, that's literally been said by the past chairman of the Planning Board," he said.
 
"Well, that's really fear-mongering 101. First of all, you have to be in the business zone to even apply for a drive-through window permit from the zoning board of appeals so that rules out 99 percent of Main Street because a lot of the businesses even on Main Street are on residential property."  

Tags: drive-through,   Planning Board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories