Letter: This Issue Is Not Biking, It Is Springside

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Here are a few of many points to consider in the discussion about irrevocably damaging Springside Park for the self-interest of a tiny minority, as opposed to the entire public, and the trust they have in the city to maintain this unique park for all people as free open space. What the PR pundits tell us is not the real story, it is a Trojan horse for the invasion of the park, and once lost it can not be regained.

1) As founder of the Friends of Springside in 1990 with Mary Ann Knight, I feel the current mountain bike proposal is wrong for this 112-year-old park, a natural, undisturbed, free, open space for all. It now has about half the tree species of our region and is known for its diversity of birds, mammals, plant life, wetlands, and terrain in the heart of Pittsfield, rare in an urban location.

2) Such a restricted use activity will have the gravest impact on its fragile habitats, an unprecedented nature's classroom, and a top priority of the park's master plan as well as community education programs for the city's schools.

3) Mountain biking already is taking place in spacious conservation sites in Pittsfield such as Kirvin, Burbank, and Brattlebrook, not to mention the Pittsfield State Forest's 11,000 acres, and October Mountain State Forest's 16,460 acres, venues that provide all the necessary ingredients, allow easy access, and not sacrifice the surrounding environment. Why then invade Springside?

4) What specific structures — metal, synthetics, paving — will be built; what is the actual space required, as opposed to promotional "estimates?" How will people access the course; where will they park? This will involve dredging more land for a blacktopped course, access road, and parking lot close to the site, further poisoning the park ecosystems and beauty. Will there be approvals for such construction in accordance with state and federal law? It is easy to see a prohibitive cost with an ultimate agenda of taking over the entire park, as was the case with the 1990 golf course, 2003 soccer fields, and other proposals.



5) The reality is that the vast majority of biking in the park will be adult races and people who will abuse and vandalize the park even further, just as has happened at the mounded area near Garland Avenue for two decades. To state that its location at Springside is for access by low-income groups is misleading, since low-income children and adults, as everyone, already do engage and benefit from the undisturbed nature of Springside.

6) Issues of construction, maintenance, security, future funding, permits, and vandalism are not solved with PR images and political maneuvers; they remain unknown and the result will be the devastation of Springside.

7) As is the case across the country, there is well-documented evidence of mountain biking damage at Burbank, the State Forest, and October Mountain, where existing nature trails are ruined and new illegally-constructed bike trails destroy the landscape. Motorcycles, ATVs, and electric mountain bikes are already being used throughout the park as a direct result of the wrongly approved and "constructed" trails since 2012.

8) We must confront this intrusion and deny any use of the park for mountain biking or similar restricted-use disruptive activity. Do we as a city want to turn every park into yet another sports complex? Or do we value something more: a place of reflection and connection with nature, others, and oneself, giving us our full humanity, Springside's gift to us all.

Royal Hartigan
Pittsfield, Mass.

Plans for the pump, or skills, track at Springside was approved last year by the Parks Commission. The design can be seen here. 

 


Tags: bicycling,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Board Looks to Pontoosuc Island Safety and Cleanup

By Breanna Steele

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Friends of Pontoosuc cleaned up the two islands on the lake and shared concerns of what they saw.

Kevin McGinnis, Friends board member, spoke to the Select Board last week about how the cleanup went and erosion the group discovered.

"We particularly wanted to go out and take a peek at the islands and it was seven bags of garbage and a lot of refuse from geese that we actually removed from both islands," he said. "The Keeler Island, particularly in Lanesborough, that had a Sheetrock bucket full of nails that we actually removed from there, too, and that was from probably multiple years of pallet burning out there."

McGinnis added that there is significant erosion on the east side of the islands, facing the deepest part of the channel.

He said Lee Popovich, who knows horticulture, suggested plantings along the edges to hold the soil and filter runoff that may help with the E. coli outbreaks on the lake.

"These are things that we can discuss on trying to keep those islands in enjoyable shape, and for people to be able to enjoy," McGinnis said, by reducing risks such as geese deposits, and plantings that can help filter some of the debris.

"We can't control how hard our rain comes, but we can mitigate some of that filtering processes to keep bacteria count lower. Because if you notice, pretty much the E. coli breakouts that we do have are right after heavy rain."

He wants to help keep the islands safe and healthy. He introduced the cleanup group, saying the cleanup was enjoyable and those who volunteered help make a difference.

"Look forward to in the future bringing more information back, and with a lot of moving parts to talk about mitigating erosion and certain things," McGinnis said. "But it's something that we all need to be kind of aware of, and this body of water is so enjoyable, and we definitely want to try to keep it as healthy as possible, and keep control or keep an eye on certain things."

Select Board member Jason Breault asked about what the insurance is for the islands to which Town Administrator Gina Dario responded that the island is a public park, so it's covered the same way as other town land, like Glaston Park. There's no added liability.

Breault then asked from a patrol aspect what that means.

"Obviously, if we have an underage drinking party, we have no mechanism to address it, or if there's a medical emergency on that area, we would have to get a boat from Pittsfield, so obviously we have some sort of a delay there," Police Chief Rob Derksen said. "That's the only concern, I guess, is it's a park that we can't patrol and we can't regulate on a regular basis," 

Breault wondered if they could get funding for a boat down the line but Derksen said it would be difficult with his small force.

"That's pulling the thread on a sweater because then I have to have certified boat officers and, I mean, so that's training that's time away and then I would have to be able to actually put them on the boat, which again as you've heard me say a million times, most of the time I have one officer on duty so I can't split them in half and put half on a boat, half in a car, so it would be a challenge."

He added that the lake is patrolled by the state Environmental Police but with recent funding challenges, it's not that much.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories