Lanesborough Selectmen OK $65K for Temporary Police Station

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Board of Selectmen has approved $65,000 to fund a two-year lease for a temporary police building as the Police Station Building Committee continues discussing its concerns with the site of the proposed new station. 

 

Committee Chair Kristen Tool spoke before the Selectmen on Monday to share the proposed plan for leasing 545 South Main St. after exploring multiple options for a temporary station. The American Rescue Plan Act Fund Committee approved the use of its money for the lease last week

 

Tool said minimal work, such as replacing a few doors and some carpeting, is needed for the building to be ready for officers. She said this temporary site, which the Police Department will stay in until construction of the new station is finished, saves the town over $115,000 compared to renting a trailer. 

 

"The property owner has just been really delightful to work with," she said. "He's very excited about the idea of the station being there, the temporary location ... . This is definitely the the best possible option that the committee came across." 

 

The committee also met on Tuesday to continue discussing the deficiencies of the 8 Prospect St. site. Former Police Chief Timothy Sorrell sought out the original 1934 deed after a discussion in a previous meeting and said a deed restriction stipulates the town use the parcel as a public park. 

 

Tool suggested someone check with town counsel to determine the possible options for the site. Sorrell and other committee members said this likely has never come up before because the town has not made any significant alterations to the site since 1934. 

 

"The building, at one point, has been everything," he said. "It was a meeting hall, as far as I know, then it slowly became different things ...  And you can't say the town hasn't been maintaining it as a park, because it's got grass, we grow trees there, flowers on the stumps out front. We've been maintaining it." 

 

Tool also provided the committee a list of considerations compiled from past discussions, including the parcel's small size, potential zoning issues with a new building, the in-ground gas pumps, parking and needed soil testing. The viability of the property has an ongoing debate for the committee during several meetings, including one with Brian Humes of Jacumsci & Humes Architects

 

Selectman Gordon Hubbard was in attendance on Tuesday and said he was beginning to understand why the committee has issues with 8 Prospect St. as the new station site. He said the restriction with the deed could cause the town significant problems. 

 

"If we can't do this, then trying to figure why we shouldn't do it is a moot point. These are the reasons why we maybe shouldn't do it. But if the deed says you can't do it, then who cares?" he said. "The other point is, you could spend a billion dollars and take care of all these things. But is it monetarily appropriate?"


Tags: police station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Mall Owners Press for Road District Dissolution

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Berkshire Mall owner JMJ RE Holdings says without a dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through.
 
The Select Board last week authorized two of its members to work on a compromise between the JMJ and the road district. The two entities have been at loggerheads over assessments to the district — and the district's purpose.
 
Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, recently responded to iBerkshires' coverage of the meeting, during which the board discussed mediation but took no comments from the public or the mall owners. 
 
Grogan said JMJ has been under purchase contract with real estate developer Cypress Equities since May and has an intention to close in the fall.
 
"We are contractually obligated to deliver the property with the BHRD dissolved. If that does not happen, the mall will not get redeveloped. If the BHRD is not dissolved, the transaction with Cypress cannot close," said Grogan over email. "That is not a position JMJ adopted as leverage. It is the express term of a fully executed purchase and sale agreement. Should the town proceed in a manner that departs from the existing settlement framework, JMJ will evaluate all available claims to protect its contractual rights."
 
The town had initially agreed to seek the dissolution of the district through the Legislature based on JMJ paying $1.1 million to resolve all tax disputes. But that article was pulled from the annual town meeting when town officials said the mall's owners failed to make payment by the deadline. 
 
The road district was established 40 years ago to maintain the Connector Road between Routes 7 and 8 and assess the mall for fire and police protection. The mall closed in 2019 and its various owners since then have sought to redevelop the property. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories