Lanesborough Police Station Panel: No to Prospect Site

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Police Station Building Committee has decided that it does not endorse 8 Prospect St. as the site for a potential new police station building

 

The committee has discussed potential issues with the location of the current station on several occasions, including its size, location, required soil research and a lack of parking. In April, the committee also discovered the deed for 8 Prospect has a restriction requiring the town maintain the parcel as a public park.

 

"I could never feel good about putting a stamp of approval on that site, me personally," said Committee member Glen Storie. "Even if they decide that's just what they want, I'm still, personally, against it." 

 

Committee Chair Tool said the final decision on a new police station site is the Select Board's to make. She said the Select Board has not given the committee authority to explore other potential sites, despite its concerns with the Prospect Street site that's on the bottom of the hill at the corner with Route 7.

 

"If we are given permission to look at other sites, we can pull two or three sites and do a comparison of them," she said. "And that's really what should have been done from the very beginning with all of this, and now almost all of those sites are off the table." 

 

The Select Board entered executive session on May 23 to discuss the deed restriction, but has not provided the committee any additional updates. Tool said she thinks it would be irresponsible of the town to go through the process of changing the deed when the committee already has several other issues with the site. 

 

"My understanding is that the process is generally very difficult," said Committee Chair Kristen Tool. "It's lengthy, and you can go through the whole thing and think it's going to work, and the judge says no." 

 

Several committee members also voiced concerns with setting a precedent by pursuing legal action to change the deed restriction. Committee member and former Police Chief Timothy Sorrell said altering the deed could discourage future donations. 

 

"Who is going to want to donate property to the town of Lanesborough? And you want to donate property, 'Hey, I want this to be a park in my name.' And then you see what they've done," Sorrell said.

 

The board also discussed the lease for the temporary station, which Police Chief Robert Derksen expects to be ready for approval at the next Select Board meeting. Derksen said he and Town Administrator Joshua Lang have worked with the property owner to finalize the lease, with most of the work inside already being complete. 

 

"[The property owner] has done a tremendous amount of work," he said. "With the exception of a couple of rooms that they just have to finish painting, it looks amazing right now," he said. 

 

While the lease would have the Police Department taking over the building on July 1, Derksen said completing the move to the new space will likely take until August. 

 

"Just because we have to get IT in there, we have to get internet cables; we have to get security camera companies in. So there's a lot of logistics," he said.


Tags: police station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Uncertain on How to Budget for Clean Air Efforts

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — As concerns about Berkshire Concrete's operations persist, Select Board members agree funding is needed, but are uncertain on how it should be allocated.
 
During its meeting on Monday, Select Board member Antonio "Tony" Pagliarulo requested that the town include in the budget funds for technical air-monitoring and potentially legal costs for the Clean Air Committee budget. 
 
In June, the board approved the establishment of a Clean Air Ad Hoc Committee, charged with reviewing the special permit and ensuring compliance. 
 
The committee consists of one Select Board member, a Board of Health representative, a Planning Board member, a Conservation Commissioner, and two citizen members: one from the Dalton Clean Air Coalition and another at-large citizen.
 
For over a year, residents attended numerous meetings urging action to stop sand from leaving parcel No. 105-16, owned by Berkshire Concrete, a subsidiary of Petricca Industries.
 
Since then, the Zoning Board ordered the company to fully remediate the unauthorized dig site on parcel No. 105-16, the Board of Health fined it $5,000, and the Planning Board denied its special permit
 
Board members seemed to agree that budgeting funds for clean air monitoring be set aside in the Clean Air Committee budget but not how legal fees should be budgeted. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories