Lanesborough Police Station Panel: No to Prospect Site

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Police Station Building Committee has decided that it does not endorse 8 Prospect St. as the site for a potential new police station building

 

The committee has discussed potential issues with the location of the current station on several occasions, including its size, location, required soil research and a lack of parking. In April, the committee also discovered the deed for 8 Prospect has a restriction requiring the town maintain the parcel as a public park.

 

"I could never feel good about putting a stamp of approval on that site, me personally," said Committee member Glen Storie. "Even if they decide that's just what they want, I'm still, personally, against it." 

 

Committee Chair Tool said the final decision on a new police station site is the Select Board's to make. She said the Select Board has not given the committee authority to explore other potential sites, despite its concerns with the Prospect Street site that's on the bottom of the hill at the corner with Route 7.

 

"If we are given permission to look at other sites, we can pull two or three sites and do a comparison of them," she said. "And that's really what should have been done from the very beginning with all of this, and now almost all of those sites are off the table." 

 

The Select Board entered executive session on May 23 to discuss the deed restriction, but has not provided the committee any additional updates. Tool said she thinks it would be irresponsible of the town to go through the process of changing the deed when the committee already has several other issues with the site. 

 

"My understanding is that the process is generally very difficult," said Committee Chair Kristen Tool. "It's lengthy, and you can go through the whole thing and think it's going to work, and the judge says no." 

 

Several committee members also voiced concerns with setting a precedent by pursuing legal action to change the deed restriction. Committee member and former Police Chief Timothy Sorrell said altering the deed could discourage future donations. 

 

"Who is going to want to donate property to the town of Lanesborough? And you want to donate property, 'Hey, I want this to be a park in my name.' And then you see what they've done," Sorrell said.

 

The board also discussed the lease for the temporary station, which Police Chief Robert Derksen expects to be ready for approval at the next Select Board meeting. Derksen said he and Town Administrator Joshua Lang have worked with the property owner to finalize the lease, with most of the work inside already being complete. 

 

"[The property owner] has done a tremendous amount of work," he said. "With the exception of a couple of rooms that they just have to finish painting, it looks amazing right now," he said. 

 

While the lease would have the Police Department taking over the building on July 1, Derksen said completing the move to the new space will likely take until August. 

 

"Just because we have to get IT in there, we have to get internet cables; we have to get security camera companies in. So there's a lot of logistics," he said.


Tags: police station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Concrete Lawsuit Seeks Damages, Continued Operation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — Whether Berkshire Concrete can continue excavating after its permit was denied —and if the town is liable for damages — will be decided in a lawsuit the company has filed against the town, planning board and its members.
 
The suit was filed on behalf of Berkshire Concrete Corp., a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, by Jaan G. Rannik of Cohen Kinne Valicenti & Cook in Superior Court on April 13
 
Berkshire Concrete is suing for damages and wants the Planning Board's permit denial overturned.
 
The company seeks permission to operate on its entire property, and to have any future permit applications granted — unless they violate previous permit conditions and fail to fix them after formal written notice, or if the Mine Safety and Health Administration finds a public health danger requiring new restrictions.
 
It also requests that if a future renewal is denied for a violation and Berkshire Concrete disputes it or claims it didn't have time to fix, operations can continue until a  final decision is made.
 
The company claims the town breached its 1992 contract with Berkshire Concrete and the board exceeded its authority in denying the special permit. 
 
Berkshire Concrete claims that as a direct result of the town's breach of contract it suffered damages of no less than 1.9 million and will continue to incur additional damages. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories