WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Prudential Committee on Wednesday discussed the need for a policy for all call-volunteer firefighters who reach the state's mandatory retirement age.
And the panel talked about how the Fire Department can continue to utilize the experience of members who have reached the age of 65.
The state's retirement age first came up in the context of Chief Craig Pedercini, who had asked the Prudential Committee to start the process of a home-rule petition to the Legislature to receive an exemption for the district when he has his 65th birthday next year.
The committee declined to take that route and instead is in the opening stages of a search process for the department's next chief, a task being coordinated by the Prudential Committee's Personnel subcommittee.
That subcommittee also has been asked to draft a policy for the department that reflects the state retirement age.
Prudential Committee member Joe Beverly, who serves on the subcommittee, told his colleagues that the panel had lengthy conversations on what to do about firefighters who reach age 65.
"A lot of [subcommittee] members felt it was beneficial to have members in other roles within the fire district [after 65]," Beverly said.
"Our biggest problem going forward is we have no policies or procedures in place, and we need them. We should have language from this committee saying whether we're going to allow members to stay on or not."
Beverly said it is unfair to leave firefighters who are over age 65 in "limbo" as they technically remain on the roster. He also said that, speaking for himself, he thought it was unfair that the law "casts aside" veterans after they reach a certain age.
"They're assets to the department, and we hate to see them go," Beverly said. "We need to have a policy to say we can retain these people in a different capacity.
"I think there's another role here for those members. … They're no longer allowed to be paid. They'd be volunteers. But without language, we're kind of spinning our wheels right now."
Lindsay Neathawk agreed, saying the veteran firefighters have "a wealth of knowledge" that could be shared with newer members of the department.
Pedercini said the department does not have much choice about keeping firefighters over age 65 from responding to most emergencies.
"Any one of us can have a heart attack, pull a muscle, break a leg, but the risk is greater, as the state figures it, because at that age … " Pedercini said. "I don't agree with the number, but that's the number we have to work with.
"I don't think they should be on car accidents, medical calls, any calls the Fire Department responds to. When I hit that age, I'm in the same boat."
Both Beverly and Prudential Committee Chair David Moresi mentioned that there are liability issues for the district if firefighters past the age of 65 are involved in responding to emergency calls.
Ryan Housman, a lieutenant in the department who participated in Wednesday's meeting from the floor, suggested that there still are roles for trained, experienced retirees. Housman noted a lot of the district's calls are for activated alarms where there is no sign of a fire and suggested that firefighters who have passed the retirement age could handle those calls.
The Prudential Committee discussed the need to bring in a human resources consultant to review any policy that is drafted by the subcommittee. It also has discussed getting a professional to review a job description for the next chief that the subcommittee is charged with developing.
The committee voted unanimously to authorize Moresi to send a scoping letter to three qualified HR firms to get estimates for that consultation.
The committee did get some positive news on the Main Street station building project.
Bruce Decoteau, the district's building consultant, reported that construction manager Consigli had begun reviewing bids for some of the biggest line items in the project, including concrete and steel, and that the bids were in line with the latest estimates the district had on hand.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Lanesborough Officials Review Schools' Budgets
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Mount Greylock Superintendent Joseph Bergeron, left, addresses the Lanesborough Select Board and Finance Committee as School Committee member Curtis Elfenbein looks at the projection of a slide in the district's budget presentation.
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town officials Monday appeared generally receptive to the fiscal year 2027 spending plans for the two public school districts that serve the town.
Superintendents from the Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District (McCann Technical School) and Mount Greylock Regional School District presented their respective FY27 budgets to a joint meeting of the town's Finance Committee and Select Board.
Both districts are sending significantly higher assessments for approval at Lanesborough's annual town meeting in June.
McCann Tech, which constituted a $317,109 expenditure for the town in the current fiscal year, is seeking $463,978 for the fiscal year that begins on July 1 even though the school's operating budget is up just 3.2 percent year to year.
The 46 percent increase in Lanesborough's share of McCann Tech's budget is is due to two factors: a rise in enrollment of town residents at the vocational school from 20 in 2025 to 29 in this school year and a capital assessment for the first round of payments — for interest only — for a roof and window replacement project on the North Adams campus.
The Mount Greylock assessment, a much larger component of Lanesborough's property tax bill, is up 10.99 percent from FY26 to FY27, from $6.8 million to $7.6 million.
Mount Greylock Superintendent Joseph Bergeron gave a budget presentation similar to one he has delivered twice to the district's School Committee and again last month to the Williamstown Finance Committee, explaining that while the FY27 budget maintains level services to students with a net reduction of three positions, a series of factors are driving much larger assessments to Mount Greylock's two member towns.
Bergeron answered that officials in both member towns told the district they did not want Mount Greylock using taxpayers' money to build their reserves. click for more
Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 84 North Summer St.
click for more
The tax bill of a median-priced single family home will go up by 8.45 percent in the year that begins July 1 under a spending plan approved by the Finance Committee on Wednesday night.
click for more
Colleen Taylor and her brother and business partner Sean Taylor grabbed the concession offered by the Five Corners Stewardship Association, which purchased the store at the junction of Routes 7 and 43 in 2022.
click for more