Adams Parks Commission Concerned about Berm near Russell Field

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

ADAMS, Mass. — The Parks Commissioners are concerned about a berm near the scoreboard on Russell Field, which they believe is small enough to let water from a nearby stream overflow.  

"There's a hill that protects the stream from going into the field. At that point, that berm, that hill, is very small and inadequate," said Commission Member James Fassell. 

 

The stream is located just feet from the field's scoreboard. The commission voted to let the Department of Public Works deal with the issue and plans to bring the problem to the Board of Selectmen if DPW can not fix it alone. 

 

Selectman Joseph Nowak attended the meeting and said he noticed the berm when visiting the field last month. He said he also saw trees were blocking certain field lights. 

 

"I walked over and just noticed that it's really getting close ... And another thing too I noticed, along the whole stream, there's a lot of brush that's fallen in there that should be thrown off to the side, because it starts to catch leaves and it changes directions," he said. 

 

In other business, the commission tabled discussion on dedicating two Sundays for Hoosac Valley High School junior football as no representatives from the school district were present. Michael Mucci, chair of the Hoosac Valley Regional School Committee, said at the commission's June 13 meeting that junior football did this in previous years

 

The commission also tabled discussion on the proposed new Valley Street Field shed, as Mike Benson of the Adams-Cheshire Little League was unable to attend. Benson said at the June 13 meeting that the league is still working on getting funds for the project. 

 

The board voted to support the move of the infield bleachers at Renfrew Field after Parks Foreman Steve Skrocki suggested at a previous meeting that the move would keep heavy machinery off the field. 

 

Mark Pizani, an equipment operator at DPW, said the change should cause less wear for both the field and the bleachers. 

 

"It's not a good idea to keep moving those bleachers onto the infield," he said. "It really screws up our work to get done on the baseball field. I have to roto-till that field every year because when it's not being played on when we're not working on it, grass grows up to it like crazy."

 

Fassell said he did not personally agree with the move but voted to support the measure, saying he understands why the original bleacher placement is an issue. 

 

The commission will meet next on Aug. 8. 


Tags: parks commission,   playing fields,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories