image description

Pittsfield Subcommittee OKs $230K for Excess Asphalt Costs

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The finance subcommittee on Tuesday authorized the transfer of $230,000 from the Public Works Stabilization Account to the Department of Public Services for inflated costs of liquid asphalt.

"This year was a little crazy in terms of costs, expenses, as we have seen over and over," Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales said.  "And liquid asphalt is not shielded from all the changes in price."

He said the state Department of Transportation issues a monthly update on the price of liquid asphalt and under the contracts municipalities have for work being funded by Chapter 90, they are required to adjust the price if the value changes more than 5 percent from the original month when it was bid.

In this case, it was bid in March. The price was was under the threshold in April and above 5 percent in May, kicking in the law.  

Morales added that the rule says contractors are entitled to the entire increase rather than the difference beyond 5 percent, which he said is not favorable.

The $230,000 converts to around 3 miles of roads.

Councilor zt Large Karen Kalinowsky pointed out that the bid was about $4.4 million and the city has paid about $5.4 million and queried Morales on the difference.


He explained that his department estimates the cost as best as possible but that there are a number of factors that can change it.

When the bid is sent out, the contractors come in and sometimes find miscalculations in road measurements or finds that the pavement has to be thicker, which can raise the cost.

The discrepancy is reportedly common.

The panel also discussed Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren's petition requesting to establish a procedure for the award of independent auditors. It was tabled and referred to City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta.

Warren said he understands it will not be a short process. 

The conversation was started in October when Scanlon and Associates was recommended for auditing services by a three-person committee including the city's finance director, Council President Peter Marchetti, and an accountant after an request for proposals was issued.

Warren said the city charter needs to be more fleshed out to better the process.

The city code states that:

"The city council shall annually provide for an outside audit of the books and accounts of the city to be conducted by a certified public accountant or a firm of certified public accountants, which has no personal interest, direct or indirect, in the fiscal affairs of the city or any of its officers. The mayor shall annually provide to the city council a sum of money sufficient to satisfy the estimated cost of conducting the audit as presented to the mayor, in writing, by the city council."


Tags: paving,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Schools Consider Enhanced Bus Surveillance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The Pittsfield Public Schools are considering a couple of companies for enhanced bus safety surveillance after a spring pilot. 

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Bonnie Howland reported that they have met with BusPatrol and Gatekeeper Systems, which offer automated stop-arm enforcement and video surveillance.

It is illegal for drivers to pass a school bus when the red warning lights are flashing, and the stop-sign arm is extended.  This protects children exiting and entering the school bus. 

A stop-arm camera pilot program was conducted in May. 

"We currently have a four-camera system on the interior of the bus, so Gatekeeper is sort of better as far as functionality. It's a little more of an upfront investment," Howland told the School Committee last week. 

"BusPatrol works where you basically have an installation of the cameras, and then as tickets are issued to people, you sort of regain your investment, so it's two different sort of cost profiles."

Gatekeeper would cost about $100,000 to purchase, while BusPatrol has no upfront cost and a monthly charge. 

PPS is interested in putting cameras in all of its buses, about 30.  Howland said that Gatekeeper has a little more robust system that fits into our current system, and Mayor Peter Marchetti reported that the company with no upfront cost helps secure a grant for implementation: $1,200 per camera and $250 a month per bus. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories