Pittsfield School Panels Favors Safe Gun Storage Outreach

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A School Committee panel is in favor of the district promoting secure gun storage.
 
On Tuesday, the new Social Emotional Learning and Safety subcommittee referred a presentation and resolution on secure gun storage by the national Be Smart for Kids advocacy group to the full committee.
 
"It's sad we have to do any of these things," member Daniel Elias said.
 
"But the ALICE I think is so worthwhile and this type of gun ownership responsible storage is so worthwhile. It's sad that we have to do either of them but they're both very necessary."
 
ALICE stands for "Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter and Evacuate," a well-known active shooter drill.
 
Patrie Sardo of Be Smart and Vicki Zacharewicz of Berkshire County Moms Demand Actions outlined the prevalence of state and nationwide gun violence incidents and gave recommendations about safe storage to hinder further tragedy.
 
The resolution asks that the committee updates the student handbook with information about parents' legal obligations for secure firearms and that it directs the superintendent to create appropriate communication on the matter.
 
Sardo and Zacharewicz said there were 51 school shootings last year that resulted in injuries or death, including the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, that claimed the lives of 19 children and two teachers. There were also threats of violence and arrests for firearm possession at various state schools.
 
Additionally, data shows that a high percentage of underage shooters obtain unsecured guns from home or a family member and there has been a surge in gun ownership in the last few years.
 
"We have all been horrified too many times by school shootings," Sardo said.
 
They hope to get gun owners and non-gun owners to work together on a solution to keep kids safe.
 
Sardo said this is a critical message that is often omitted from school communications.
 
"So we are urging you today to add one more component to your school safety strategy," she explained. "Incorporating a proactive message to parents and caregivers, and guardians about secure firearm storage to protect students from potential tragedies."
 
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control identifies firearms as the leading cause of death in the nation for children ages one to 18. According to the data, more than 1,800 children are killed every year, an average of five children a day, and if 18- and 19-year-olds are included that number doubles.
 
"Gun violence is a complex issue with many causes," Zacharewicz said. "There is no one solution to reduce gun violence but there are many evidence-based solutions and raising public awareness about the importance of firearm storage is one of those solutions."
 
The American Academy of Pediatrics has concluded that the complete absence of guns in the home is the most effective deterrent to preventing firearm-related incidents in children and teens but if there are guns in the home, it strongly recommends that storing guns unloaded and locked with ammunition kept in a separate place is the best way to reduce risks.
 
Massachusetts law states that a gun should be locked and unloaded while in a home and vehicle.  This suggestion just takes it one step further.
 
"It doesn't infringe on anyone's rights and I do believe in general in supporting everyone's individual rights, but also making sure that we're remaining safe," member Alison McGee said, adding that the resolution simply builds upon existing safety standards.
 
This movement began in 2019 and today at least 73 school districts in 17 states have either passed secure storage notification resolutions and/or partnered with Be Smart program.
 
The resolution was approved by the Mount Greylock Regional School District last month.

Tags: guns,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories